{"title":"被动旋转运动范围与肩关节脱位:一项比较研究。","authors":"Joel Buckler, William Stanish, Cheryl Kozey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conflicting reports of range of motion (ROM) findings exist related to shoulder instability. Knowledge of range of motion findings among individuals with shoulder subluxation may aid in diagnosis and facilitate appropriate management.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare passive rotation ROM and determine if a symptom-provoking activity alters ROM between patients with shoulder subluxations and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen symptomatic patients with shoulder subluxations and 14 healthy controls between the ages of 18 and 35 years were recruited. Lateral and medial rotation ROM measures were taken using a universal goniometer. Symptoms were assessed using a 10cm visual analog scale (VAS). Each group performed a symptom-provoking activity, and VAS and ROM measures were repeated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-factor analysis of variance with repeated measures on pre/post activity demonstrated lower medial rotation measures for the instability group, but no differences for lateral rotation or total range (p < 0.05). A \"warm-up\" effect was noted, with greater ROM found in each group post activity, with a greater increase noted among controls. Analysis of the ratio of lateral rotation to medial rotation ROM found a significantly greater ratio in the instability group. VAS pain scores were greater in the instability group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Shoulder subluxation is not necessarily associated with increased rotation ROM, therefore total ROM findings should not be used to screen for instability. Imbalances in rotation ROM may be associated with symptomatic shoulder instability and may have implications for treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":88617,"journal":{"name":"North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT","volume":"4 4","pages":"182-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953352/pdf/najspt-04-182.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Passive rotation range of motion and shoulder subluxation: a comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Joel Buckler, William Stanish, Cheryl Kozey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conflicting reports of range of motion (ROM) findings exist related to shoulder instability. Knowledge of range of motion findings among individuals with shoulder subluxation may aid in diagnosis and facilitate appropriate management.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare passive rotation ROM and determine if a symptom-provoking activity alters ROM between patients with shoulder subluxations and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen symptomatic patients with shoulder subluxations and 14 healthy controls between the ages of 18 and 35 years were recruited. Lateral and medial rotation ROM measures were taken using a universal goniometer. Symptoms were assessed using a 10cm visual analog scale (VAS). Each group performed a symptom-provoking activity, and VAS and ROM measures were repeated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-factor analysis of variance with repeated measures on pre/post activity demonstrated lower medial rotation measures for the instability group, but no differences for lateral rotation or total range (p < 0.05). A \\\"warm-up\\\" effect was noted, with greater ROM found in each group post activity, with a greater increase noted among controls. Analysis of the ratio of lateral rotation to medial rotation ROM found a significantly greater ratio in the instability group. VAS pain scores were greater in the instability group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Shoulder subluxation is not necessarily associated with increased rotation ROM, therefore total ROM findings should not be used to screen for instability. Imbalances in rotation ROM may be associated with symptomatic shoulder instability and may have implications for treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"182-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953352/pdf/najspt-04-182.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American journal of sports physical therapy : NAJSPT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:有关肩关节不稳定的运动范围(ROM)结果存在相互矛盾的报道。目的:本研究旨在比较肩关节脱位患者和健康对照组的被动旋转 ROM,并确定引起症状的活动是否会改变 ROM:招募了 17 名有症状的肩关节半脱位患者和 14 名健康对照者,年龄在 18 岁至 35 岁之间。使用通用动态关节角度计测量外侧和内侧旋转 ROM。使用 10 厘米视觉模拟量表(VAS)对症状进行评估。每组进行一次诱发症状的活动,然后重复测量视觉模拟量表和关节活动度:对活动前后进行重复测量的双因素方差分析显示,不稳定组的内旋测量值较低,但外侧旋转或总幅度没有差异(P < 0.05)。我们注意到了 "热身 "效应,活动后各组的 ROM 都有所增加,对照组的增幅更大。通过分析外侧旋转与内侧旋转 ROM 的比率,发现不稳定组的比率明显更高。不稳定组的 VAS 疼痛评分更高:结论:肩关节脱位并不一定与旋转ROM的增加有关,因此总的ROM结果不应被用来筛查肩关节不稳定。旋转ROM的不平衡可能与有症状的肩关节不稳定有关,并可能对治疗产生影响。
Passive rotation range of motion and shoulder subluxation: a comparative study.
Background: Conflicting reports of range of motion (ROM) findings exist related to shoulder instability. Knowledge of range of motion findings among individuals with shoulder subluxation may aid in diagnosis and facilitate appropriate management.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare passive rotation ROM and determine if a symptom-provoking activity alters ROM between patients with shoulder subluxations and healthy controls.
Methods: Seventeen symptomatic patients with shoulder subluxations and 14 healthy controls between the ages of 18 and 35 years were recruited. Lateral and medial rotation ROM measures were taken using a universal goniometer. Symptoms were assessed using a 10cm visual analog scale (VAS). Each group performed a symptom-provoking activity, and VAS and ROM measures were repeated.
Results: A two-factor analysis of variance with repeated measures on pre/post activity demonstrated lower medial rotation measures for the instability group, but no differences for lateral rotation or total range (p < 0.05). A "warm-up" effect was noted, with greater ROM found in each group post activity, with a greater increase noted among controls. Analysis of the ratio of lateral rotation to medial rotation ROM found a significantly greater ratio in the instability group. VAS pain scores were greater in the instability group.
Conclusion: Shoulder subluxation is not necessarily associated with increased rotation ROM, therefore total ROM findings should not be used to screen for instability. Imbalances in rotation ROM may be associated with symptomatic shoulder instability and may have implications for treatment.