[预防性酮洛芬用于泌尿外科术后疼痛缓解]。

Anestezjologia intensywna terapia Pub Date : 2011-01-01
Rafał Rutyna, Magdalena Popowicz, Paweł Wojewoda, Andrzej Nestorowicz, Waldemar Białek
{"title":"[预防性酮洛芬用于泌尿外科术后疼痛缓解]。","authors":"Rafał Rutyna,&nbsp;Magdalena Popowicz,&nbsp;Paweł Wojewoda,&nbsp;Andrzej Nestorowicz,&nbsp;Waldemar Białek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective multimodal postoperative analgesia is one of determinants of patient satisfaction after successful surgery. Following the recommendations of non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents (NSAIDs) for pre-emptive analgesia, we assessed the efficacy of ketoprofen administered before urological surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two ASA I and II adult patients, scheduled for elective urologic procedures under general anaesthesia, were enrolled in this prospective, double blind study. They were randomized to receive intravenously either 100 mg ketoprofen or placebo (0.9% saline), one hour before the procedure, and at 8, 24, 36 and 48 h after. Pethidine was given for rescue analgesia. VAS was used for pain scoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain scores were similar in both groups and identified as severe (VAS >4) during the first 48 h after surgery. There was no difference in the number of patients requiring rescue pethidine analgesia, mostly required during the first 12 postoperative hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-emptive analgesia with intravenous ketoprofen was ineffective in patients undergoing urological surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":88221,"journal":{"name":"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia","volume":"43 1","pages":"18-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Pre-emptive ketoprofen for postoperative pain relief after urologic surgery].\",\"authors\":\"Rafał Rutyna,&nbsp;Magdalena Popowicz,&nbsp;Paweł Wojewoda,&nbsp;Andrzej Nestorowicz,&nbsp;Waldemar Białek\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective multimodal postoperative analgesia is one of determinants of patient satisfaction after successful surgery. Following the recommendations of non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents (NSAIDs) for pre-emptive analgesia, we assessed the efficacy of ketoprofen administered before urological surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two ASA I and II adult patients, scheduled for elective urologic procedures under general anaesthesia, were enrolled in this prospective, double blind study. They were randomized to receive intravenously either 100 mg ketoprofen or placebo (0.9% saline), one hour before the procedure, and at 8, 24, 36 and 48 h after. Pethidine was given for rescue analgesia. VAS was used for pain scoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain scores were similar in both groups and identified as severe (VAS >4) during the first 48 h after surgery. There was no difference in the number of patients requiring rescue pethidine analgesia, mostly required during the first 12 postoperative hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-emptive analgesia with intravenous ketoprofen was ineffective in patients undergoing urological surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"18-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有效的多模式术后镇痛是手术成功后患者满意度的决定因素之一。根据非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)用于先发制人镇痛的建议,我们评估了在泌尿外科手术前给予酮洛芬的疗效。方法:52例ASA I级和ASA II级的成人患者,计划在全身麻醉下进行选择性泌尿外科手术,纳入这项前瞻性双盲研究。他们被随机分为术前1小时、术后8小时、24小时、36小时和48小时静脉注射100毫克酮洛芬或安慰剂(0.9%生理盐水)。给予哌替啶进行抢救性镇痛。采用VAS进行疼痛评分。结果:两组患者术后48 h疼痛评分相近,均为重度(VAS >4)。需要挽救哌替啶镇痛的患者数量没有差异,大多数需要在术后前12小时。结论:输注酮洛芬先发制人镇痛对泌尿外科手术患者无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Pre-emptive ketoprofen for postoperative pain relief after urologic surgery].

Background: Effective multimodal postoperative analgesia is one of determinants of patient satisfaction after successful surgery. Following the recommendations of non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents (NSAIDs) for pre-emptive analgesia, we assessed the efficacy of ketoprofen administered before urological surgery.

Methods: Fifty-two ASA I and II adult patients, scheduled for elective urologic procedures under general anaesthesia, were enrolled in this prospective, double blind study. They were randomized to receive intravenously either 100 mg ketoprofen or placebo (0.9% saline), one hour before the procedure, and at 8, 24, 36 and 48 h after. Pethidine was given for rescue analgesia. VAS was used for pain scoring.

Results: Pain scores were similar in both groups and identified as severe (VAS >4) during the first 48 h after surgery. There was no difference in the number of patients requiring rescue pethidine analgesia, mostly required during the first 12 postoperative hours.

Conclusion: Pre-emptive analgesia with intravenous ketoprofen was ineffective in patients undergoing urological surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Balancing sedation and ICU delirium management for better patient outcomes Impact of the perioperative care model on mortality of patients treated in general surgery wards. [Effect of red blood cell transfusions on the frequency of infections in the ITU]. [Does the time of admission to ITU affect mortality?]. [Pain treatment in the emergency department: what do patients think?].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1