[复苏的伦理]。

Anestezjologia intensywna terapia Pub Date : 2011-07-01
Ewa Rudnicka-Drożak, Anna Aftyka
{"title":"[复苏的伦理]。","authors":"Ewa Rudnicka-Drożak,&nbsp;Anna Aftyka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resuscitation should always be attempted in a patient who has at least a theoretical chance of survival. This assumes that there are patent cerebral, coronary and pulmonary vessels, a reasonable time from cardiac arrest has not been exceeded, and cardiac arrest did not occur as a result of a terminal condition caused by an untreatable disease. During resuscitation, medical personnel may face two dilemmas: when to start CPR, and when (and how) to stop it. Apart from various medical conditions, possible outcome and will of a victim has to be taken into consideration. CPR is frequently started without an adequate knowledge of the patient's medical status. As soon as the latter is obtained, a decision about continuing CPR should be reconsidered. CPR and/or life-prolonging treatment can be stopped in several situations, i.e. lack of cardiovascular response or recognition of a life-limiting condition. The decision should be made by a team leader, acting in accordance with national or house guidelines. In terminal patients, a DNR order should be issued well in advance, usually by an attending physician. After that, the patient should be provided with palliative care, consisting of pain therapy, and treatment of dyspnoea, congestive cardiac failure, etc. In their review, the authors discuss various medical and ethical aspects of resuscitation, concluding that hospital ethics committees could be of great value in solving complicated questions relating to limitation of resuscitation and life-prolonging treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":88221,"journal":{"name":"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia","volume":"43 3","pages":"190-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The ethics of resuscitation].\",\"authors\":\"Ewa Rudnicka-Drożak,&nbsp;Anna Aftyka\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Resuscitation should always be attempted in a patient who has at least a theoretical chance of survival. This assumes that there are patent cerebral, coronary and pulmonary vessels, a reasonable time from cardiac arrest has not been exceeded, and cardiac arrest did not occur as a result of a terminal condition caused by an untreatable disease. During resuscitation, medical personnel may face two dilemmas: when to start CPR, and when (and how) to stop it. Apart from various medical conditions, possible outcome and will of a victim has to be taken into consideration. CPR is frequently started without an adequate knowledge of the patient's medical status. As soon as the latter is obtained, a decision about continuing CPR should be reconsidered. CPR and/or life-prolonging treatment can be stopped in several situations, i.e. lack of cardiovascular response or recognition of a life-limiting condition. The decision should be made by a team leader, acting in accordance with national or house guidelines. In terminal patients, a DNR order should be issued well in advance, usually by an attending physician. After that, the patient should be provided with palliative care, consisting of pain therapy, and treatment of dyspnoea, congestive cardiac failure, etc. In their review, the authors discuss various medical and ethical aspects of resuscitation, concluding that hospital ethics committees could be of great value in solving complicated questions relating to limitation of resuscitation and life-prolonging treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"190-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于至少理论上有生存机会的病人,应该尝试复苏。这假定存在未闭的脑血管、冠状动脉血管和肺动脉血管,距离心脏骤停没有超过合理时间,并且心脏骤停不是由于无法治疗的疾病引起的终末期状况而发生的。在复苏过程中,医务人员可能面临两个困境:何时开始CPR,以及何时(以及如何)停止CPR。除了各种医疗条件外,还必须考虑到受害者的可能结果和意愿。心肺复苏术常常是在没有充分了解病人医疗状况的情况下开始的。一旦获得后者,应重新考虑是否继续心肺复苏的决定。心肺复苏术和/或延长生命的治疗可在几种情况下停止,即缺乏心血管反应或认识到生命受限的情况。该决定应由团队负责人根据国家或学院的指导方针做出。对于晚期患者,应提前很长时间签发不抢救令,通常由主治医生签发。之后,应给予患者姑息治疗,包括疼痛治疗、呼吸困难、充血性心力衰竭等治疗。在他们的综述中,作者讨论了复苏的各种医学和伦理方面,结论是医院伦理委员会在解决与复苏限制和延长生命治疗有关的复杂问题方面可能具有很大的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The ethics of resuscitation].

Resuscitation should always be attempted in a patient who has at least a theoretical chance of survival. This assumes that there are patent cerebral, coronary and pulmonary vessels, a reasonable time from cardiac arrest has not been exceeded, and cardiac arrest did not occur as a result of a terminal condition caused by an untreatable disease. During resuscitation, medical personnel may face two dilemmas: when to start CPR, and when (and how) to stop it. Apart from various medical conditions, possible outcome and will of a victim has to be taken into consideration. CPR is frequently started without an adequate knowledge of the patient's medical status. As soon as the latter is obtained, a decision about continuing CPR should be reconsidered. CPR and/or life-prolonging treatment can be stopped in several situations, i.e. lack of cardiovascular response or recognition of a life-limiting condition. The decision should be made by a team leader, acting in accordance with national or house guidelines. In terminal patients, a DNR order should be issued well in advance, usually by an attending physician. After that, the patient should be provided with palliative care, consisting of pain therapy, and treatment of dyspnoea, congestive cardiac failure, etc. In their review, the authors discuss various medical and ethical aspects of resuscitation, concluding that hospital ethics committees could be of great value in solving complicated questions relating to limitation of resuscitation and life-prolonging treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Balancing sedation and ICU delirium management for better patient outcomes Impact of the perioperative care model on mortality of patients treated in general surgery wards. [Effect of red blood cell transfusions on the frequency of infections in the ITU]. [Does the time of admission to ITU affect mortality?]. [Pain treatment in the emergency department: what do patients think?].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1