骨质疏松质量和结果框架。

Menopause international Pub Date : 2012-03-01 Epub Date: 2012-02-15 DOI:10.1258/mi.2012.012002
Sarah Gray
{"title":"骨质疏松质量和结果框架。","authors":"Sarah Gray","doi":"10.1258/mi.2012.012002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In November 2011 it was announced that osteoporosis would be included in the quality and outcomes framework (QOF) for general practice (GP) in the UK. Will this make any difference? For the international reader the answer is probably none at all but within the health system of the UK it just might. The reason being that it will financially encourage primary care to pay more attention to this disease area. Primary care funding within the national health service (NHS) is complex. For anyone who is not a GP the details are likely to baffle and bore in equal measure. Some explanation is however justified in order to determine whether this will be a mechanism for promoting better care of women at and beyond menopause. General practices are usually small to medium sized, independent businesses contracted to provide services to the NHS. Payment to practices has elements that recognize the numbers of registered patients with an adjustment for deprivation, payments for ‘enhanced services’ that are over and above the core job of the GP and quality payments for meeting targets in defined clinical or organizational areas. In April 2008 osteoporosis was included in the primary care funding envelope as a designated enhanced service (DES). This funding stream encouraged practices to do extra things that they would not have done before (a ‘carrot’ approach). In return for the additional money the regulation at the time stipulated that:","PeriodicalId":87478,"journal":{"name":"Menopause international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1258/mi.2012.012002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteoporosis quality and outcomes framework.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1258/mi.2012.012002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In November 2011 it was announced that osteoporosis would be included in the quality and outcomes framework (QOF) for general practice (GP) in the UK. Will this make any difference? For the international reader the answer is probably none at all but within the health system of the UK it just might. The reason being that it will financially encourage primary care to pay more attention to this disease area. Primary care funding within the national health service (NHS) is complex. For anyone who is not a GP the details are likely to baffle and bore in equal measure. Some explanation is however justified in order to determine whether this will be a mechanism for promoting better care of women at and beyond menopause. General practices are usually small to medium sized, independent businesses contracted to provide services to the NHS. Payment to practices has elements that recognize the numbers of registered patients with an adjustment for deprivation, payments for ‘enhanced services’ that are over and above the core job of the GP and quality payments for meeting targets in defined clinical or organizational areas. In April 2008 osteoporosis was included in the primary care funding envelope as a designated enhanced service (DES). This funding stream encouraged practices to do extra things that they would not have done before (a ‘carrot’ approach). In return for the additional money the regulation at the time stipulated that:\",\"PeriodicalId\":87478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Menopause international\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1258/mi.2012.012002\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Menopause international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1258/mi.2012.012002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/mi.2012.012002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Osteoporosis quality and outcomes framework.
In November 2011 it was announced that osteoporosis would be included in the quality and outcomes framework (QOF) for general practice (GP) in the UK. Will this make any difference? For the international reader the answer is probably none at all but within the health system of the UK it just might. The reason being that it will financially encourage primary care to pay more attention to this disease area. Primary care funding within the national health service (NHS) is complex. For anyone who is not a GP the details are likely to baffle and bore in equal measure. Some explanation is however justified in order to determine whether this will be a mechanism for promoting better care of women at and beyond menopause. General practices are usually small to medium sized, independent businesses contracted to provide services to the NHS. Payment to practices has elements that recognize the numbers of registered patients with an adjustment for deprivation, payments for ‘enhanced services’ that are over and above the core job of the GP and quality payments for meeting targets in defined clinical or organizational areas. In April 2008 osteoporosis was included in the primary care funding envelope as a designated enhanced service (DES). This funding stream encouraged practices to do extra things that they would not have done before (a ‘carrot’ approach). In return for the additional money the regulation at the time stipulated that:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation and management of abnormal peri-menopausal bleeding. Extended follow-up of WHI finds ‘complex’ pattern of risk and benefit. The effect of hormones on the lower urinary tract. Stand by your man: the importance of the female in male sexual problems. Should HRT be duration limited?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1