针对智障人士的卫生政策和社区安全网

Harold A. Pollack
{"title":"针对智障人士的卫生政策和社区安全网","authors":"Harold A. Pollack","doi":"10.1002/ddrr.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores social policy developments in the arena of intellectual and developmental disabilities. It begins by summarizing the challenges facing persons with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers in 1945. Families depended on a patchwork of over-crowded and under-funded large state institutions. Children with intellectual disabilities were marginalized from education and public services. Shame and stigma, along with the lack of community-based services, led many parents to institutionalize a child. The federal government provided almost no specific assistance for disabled individuals or to their families. Postwar America provided fertile ground for parents to act collectively through the emergence of the National Association of Retarded Children (NARC). Partly as a consequence of such organizing, the 1950s marked a surprising turning-point, in which the federal government expanded income support to disabled persons through measures such as Social Security's “Disabled Adult Child” program and, by the early 1970s, the advent of Supplemental Security Income (SSI). It also reviews the growth of Medicaid as the dominant payer of medical and social services at the boundaries between personal medical services, case management, education, and other social services. The article ends by summarizing current challenges in intellectual disability policy. It notes that the size, complexity, and expense of I/DD services poses inherent challenges, particularly to state and local governments in the current recession. Adjusting for inflation, 23 states actually reduced real spending on I/DD services between 2008 and 2009. Controlling for local conditions, politically conservative states enacted deeper cuts and spent a smaller fraction of state income on intellectual disability services than other states. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011; 17:44–51.</p>","PeriodicalId":55176,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","volume":"17 1","pages":"44-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ddrr.138","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health policy and the community safety net for individuals with intellectual disability\",\"authors\":\"Harold A. Pollack\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ddrr.138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article explores social policy developments in the arena of intellectual and developmental disabilities. It begins by summarizing the challenges facing persons with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers in 1945. Families depended on a patchwork of over-crowded and under-funded large state institutions. Children with intellectual disabilities were marginalized from education and public services. Shame and stigma, along with the lack of community-based services, led many parents to institutionalize a child. The federal government provided almost no specific assistance for disabled individuals or to their families. Postwar America provided fertile ground for parents to act collectively through the emergence of the National Association of Retarded Children (NARC). Partly as a consequence of such organizing, the 1950s marked a surprising turning-point, in which the federal government expanded income support to disabled persons through measures such as Social Security's “Disabled Adult Child” program and, by the early 1970s, the advent of Supplemental Security Income (SSI). It also reviews the growth of Medicaid as the dominant payer of medical and social services at the boundaries between personal medical services, case management, education, and other social services. The article ends by summarizing current challenges in intellectual disability policy. It notes that the size, complexity, and expense of I/DD services poses inherent challenges, particularly to state and local governments in the current recession. Adjusting for inflation, 23 states actually reduced real spending on I/DD services between 2008 and 2009. Controlling for local conditions, politically conservative states enacted deeper cuts and spent a smaller fraction of state income on intellectual disability services than other states. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011; 17:44–51.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"44-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ddrr.138\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ddrr.138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ddrr.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

这篇文章探讨了智力和发育障碍领域的社会政策发展。它首先总结了1945年智障人士及其照顾者所面临的挑战。家庭依赖于拥挤不堪、资金不足的大型国家机构。智力残疾儿童被排斥在教育和公共服务之外。羞耻和耻辱,加上缺乏基于社区的服务,导致许多父母将孩子送进机构。联邦政府几乎没有为残疾人及其家庭提供任何具体援助。战后的美国通过全国弱智儿童协会(NARC)的出现,为父母们集体行动提供了肥沃的土壤。部分由于这种组织,20世纪50年代标志着一个令人惊讶的转折点,在此期间,联邦政府通过诸如社会保障的“残疾成年子女”计划等措施扩大了对残疾人的收入支持,并在20世纪70年代初出现了补充安全收入(SSI)。它还回顾了在个人医疗服务、病例管理、教育和其他社会服务之间的边界上,医疗补助作为医疗和社会服务的主要支付者的增长。文章最后总结了当前智障政策面临的挑战。报告指出,I/DD服务的规模、复杂性和费用构成了固有的挑战,特别是对当前经济衰退中的州和地方政府。根据通货膨胀调整后,2008年至2009年间,23个州实际上减少了I/DD服务的实际支出。考虑到当地情况,政治上保守的州实施了更大幅度的削减,并将州收入的一小部分用于智障服务。©2012 Wiley期刊公司Dev disability Res Rev 2011;17:44-51。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health policy and the community safety net for individuals with intellectual disability

This article explores social policy developments in the arena of intellectual and developmental disabilities. It begins by summarizing the challenges facing persons with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers in 1945. Families depended on a patchwork of over-crowded and under-funded large state institutions. Children with intellectual disabilities were marginalized from education and public services. Shame and stigma, along with the lack of community-based services, led many parents to institutionalize a child. The federal government provided almost no specific assistance for disabled individuals or to their families. Postwar America provided fertile ground for parents to act collectively through the emergence of the National Association of Retarded Children (NARC). Partly as a consequence of such organizing, the 1950s marked a surprising turning-point, in which the federal government expanded income support to disabled persons through measures such as Social Security's “Disabled Adult Child” program and, by the early 1970s, the advent of Supplemental Security Income (SSI). It also reviews the growth of Medicaid as the dominant payer of medical and social services at the boundaries between personal medical services, case management, education, and other social services. The article ends by summarizing current challenges in intellectual disability policy. It notes that the size, complexity, and expense of I/DD services poses inherent challenges, particularly to state and local governments in the current recession. Adjusting for inflation, 23 states actually reduced real spending on I/DD services between 2008 and 2009. Controlling for local conditions, politically conservative states enacted deeper cuts and spent a smaller fraction of state income on intellectual disability services than other states. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011; 17:44–51.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aging and intellectual disability: Insights from mouse models of down syndrome Aging in rare intellectual disability syndromes Health, functioning, and participation of adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy: A review of outcomes research Fragile X syndrome: An aging perspective Editorial: Special issue on adult development and aging with IDD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1