常规卫生信息系统如何改善低收入和中等收入国家卫生系统的运作?评估证据基础。

David R Hotchkiss, Mark L Diana, Karen G Fleischman Foreit
{"title":"常规卫生信息系统如何改善低收入和中等收入国家卫生系统的运作?评估证据基础。","authors":"David R Hotchkiss,&nbsp;Mark L Diana,&nbsp;Karen G Fleischman Foreit","doi":"10.1108/s1474-8231(2012)0000012006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Health system performance depends on production and use of quality health data and information. Routine health information systems (RHIS) are defined as systems that provide information at regular intervals of a year or less to meet predictable information needs. These include paper-based or electronic health records and facility- and district-level management information systems. RHIS are receiving increasing attention as an essential component of efficient, country-owned, integrated national systems. To guide investment decisions on RHIS, evidence is needed on which types of RHIS interventions work and which do not.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This chapter is a systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of RHIS interventions in low- and middle-income countries, starting from the premise that investments in RHIS could be better understood and so produce greater benefits than they currently do.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We describe the conceptual literature on the determinants of RHIS performance and its role in improving health systems functioning, discuss the evidence base on the effectiveness of strategies to improve RHIS performance, provide an overview of RHIS evaluation challenges, and make suggestions to improve the evidence base.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The goal is to help ensure that (a) RHIS interventions are appropriately designed and implemented to improve health systems functioning and (b) resulting RHIS information is used more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":35465,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Care Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/s1474-8231(2012)0000012006","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can routine health information systems improve health systems functioning in low- and middle-income countries? Assessing the evidence base.\",\"authors\":\"David R Hotchkiss,&nbsp;Mark L Diana,&nbsp;Karen G Fleischman Foreit\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/s1474-8231(2012)0000012006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Health system performance depends on production and use of quality health data and information. Routine health information systems (RHIS) are defined as systems that provide information at regular intervals of a year or less to meet predictable information needs. These include paper-based or electronic health records and facility- and district-level management information systems. RHIS are receiving increasing attention as an essential component of efficient, country-owned, integrated national systems. To guide investment decisions on RHIS, evidence is needed on which types of RHIS interventions work and which do not.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This chapter is a systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of RHIS interventions in low- and middle-income countries, starting from the premise that investments in RHIS could be better understood and so produce greater benefits than they currently do.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We describe the conceptual literature on the determinants of RHIS performance and its role in improving health systems functioning, discuss the evidence base on the effectiveness of strategies to improve RHIS performance, provide an overview of RHIS evaluation challenges, and make suggestions to improve the evidence base.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The goal is to help ensure that (a) RHIS interventions are appropriately designed and implemented to improve health systems functioning and (b) resulting RHIS information is used more effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Care Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/s1474-8231(2012)0000012006\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Care Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-8231(2012)0000012006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-8231(2012)0000012006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

目的:卫生系统的绩效取决于生产和使用高质量的卫生数据和信息。常规卫生信息系统(RHIS)是指每隔一年或更短时间定期提供信息以满足可预测信息需求的系统。这些包括纸质或电子健康记录以及设施和地区一级的管理信息系统。区域卫生系统作为有效的、国家所有的综合国家系统的一个重要组成部分正日益受到重视。为了指导关于农村卫生服务的投资决策,需要证据表明哪些类型的农村卫生服务干预措施有效,哪些无效。设计/方法/方法:本章是对低收入和中等收入国家RHIS干预措施评估文献的系统回顾,从RHIS投资可以更好地理解并因此产生比目前更大的效益这一前提开始。研究结果:我们描述了关于rhs绩效的决定因素及其在改善卫生系统功能方面的作用的概念性文献,讨论了改善rhs绩效战略有效性的证据基础,概述了rhs评估挑战,并提出了改进证据基础的建议。原创性/价值:目标是帮助确保(a)适当设计和实施RHIS干预措施,以改善卫生系统的功能,以及(b)更有效地利用由此产生的RHIS信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How can routine health information systems improve health systems functioning in low- and middle-income countries? Assessing the evidence base.

Purpose: Health system performance depends on production and use of quality health data and information. Routine health information systems (RHIS) are defined as systems that provide information at regular intervals of a year or less to meet predictable information needs. These include paper-based or electronic health records and facility- and district-level management information systems. RHIS are receiving increasing attention as an essential component of efficient, country-owned, integrated national systems. To guide investment decisions on RHIS, evidence is needed on which types of RHIS interventions work and which do not.

Design/methodology/approach: This chapter is a systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of RHIS interventions in low- and middle-income countries, starting from the premise that investments in RHIS could be better understood and so produce greater benefits than they currently do.

Findings: We describe the conceptual literature on the determinants of RHIS performance and its role in improving health systems functioning, discuss the evidence base on the effectiveness of strategies to improve RHIS performance, provide an overview of RHIS evaluation challenges, and make suggestions to improve the evidence base.

Originality/value: The goal is to help ensure that (a) RHIS interventions are appropriately designed and implemented to improve health systems functioning and (b) resulting RHIS information is used more effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Health Care Management
Advances in Health Care Management Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back to the Future: What Healthcare Organizations Need to Thrive in the Face of Persistent Environmental Uncertainty. Hospital Finances During the First Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From Washington State Hospitals. Examining Knowledge Management and the Culture Change Movement in Long-Term Care: A Study of High-Medicaid-Census Nursing Homes. Innovation Diffusion Across 13 Specialties and Associated Clinician Characteristics. Measure Twice, Change Once: Using Simulation to Support Change Management in Rural Healthcare Delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1