脂质分离在不断变化的时代中的作用。

Peter Schuff-Werner, Sebastian Fenger, Peter Kohlschein
{"title":"脂质分离在不断变化的时代中的作用。","authors":"Peter Schuff-Werner, Sebastian Fenger, Peter Kohlschein","doi":"10.1007/s11789-012-0049-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the last decades, LDL-apheresis was established as an extracorporeal treatment option for patients with severe heterozygous or homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) that is resistant to conventional treatment strategies such as diet, drugs, and changes in lifestyle. Nearly half a century ago, the first LDL-apheresis treatment was performed by plasma exchange in a child with homozygous FH. At the beginning of the 1970s, the clinical advantage of regular extracorporeal LDL-elimination was demonstrated in siblings suffering from homozygous FH. These findings encouraged researchers especially from Germany and Japan to develop extracorporeal devices to selectively eliminate LDL-cholesterol in the 1980s. Although the selectivity of the currently available LDL-apheresis devices is different, the efficacy of LDL-elimination during a single treatment is rather similar and ranges between 55 and 65 % of the pretreatment LDL plasma concentration.In the 1990s, the patients regularly treated by extracorporeal LDL-elimination, diet, and drugs were included in regression studies assessed by angiography. It was shown that the combined treatment with LDL-apheresis, diet, and drugs resulted in less progression of coronary lesions than drugs and/or diet alone. However, although a tendency was evident, results did not reach criteria for significance. During the last decade, apheresis registries were established to collect data on efficiency, safety, and clinical outcome of regular long-term LDL-apheresis. The evaluation of registry data will certainly permit further insights in the therapeutic benefit of this expensive and time-consuming therapeutic approach. Furthermore, the future of LDL-apheresis will depend upon the availability of highly efficient new drugs and molecular genetic approaches such as RNA silencing of the apoB gene, whereas the liver transplantation and gene therapy of the LDL-receptor deficiency will not replace LDL-apheresis in severe familial hypercholesterolemia in the near future.</p>","PeriodicalId":39208,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements","volume":"7 ","pages":"7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3374091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of lipid apheresis in changing times.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Schuff-Werner, Sebastian Fenger, Peter Kohlschein\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11789-012-0049-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the last decades, LDL-apheresis was established as an extracorporeal treatment option for patients with severe heterozygous or homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) that is resistant to conventional treatment strategies such as diet, drugs, and changes in lifestyle. Nearly half a century ago, the first LDL-apheresis treatment was performed by plasma exchange in a child with homozygous FH. At the beginning of the 1970s, the clinical advantage of regular extracorporeal LDL-elimination was demonstrated in siblings suffering from homozygous FH. These findings encouraged researchers especially from Germany and Japan to develop extracorporeal devices to selectively eliminate LDL-cholesterol in the 1980s. Although the selectivity of the currently available LDL-apheresis devices is different, the efficacy of LDL-elimination during a single treatment is rather similar and ranges between 55 and 65 % of the pretreatment LDL plasma concentration.In the 1990s, the patients regularly treated by extracorporeal LDL-elimination, diet, and drugs were included in regression studies assessed by angiography. It was shown that the combined treatment with LDL-apheresis, diet, and drugs resulted in less progression of coronary lesions than drugs and/or diet alone. However, although a tendency was evident, results did not reach criteria for significance. During the last decade, apheresis registries were established to collect data on efficiency, safety, and clinical outcome of regular long-term LDL-apheresis. The evaluation of registry data will certainly permit further insights in the therapeutic benefit of this expensive and time-consuming therapeutic approach. Furthermore, the future of LDL-apheresis will depend upon the availability of highly efficient new drugs and molecular genetic approaches such as RNA silencing of the apoB gene, whereas the liver transplantation and gene therapy of the LDL-receptor deficiency will not replace LDL-apheresis in severe familial hypercholesterolemia in the near future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"7-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3374091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11789-012-0049-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11789-012-0049-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年中,低密度脂蛋白血浆置换术被确立为一种体外治疗方法,用于治疗对饮食、药物和改变生活方式等传统治疗策略有抵抗力的严重杂合子或同合子家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)患者。将近半个世纪前,首次通过血浆置换对一名患有同型 FH 的儿童进行了低密度脂蛋白血症治疗。20 世纪 70 年代初,定期体外清除低密度脂蛋白的临床优势在患有同型 FH 的兄弟姐妹中得到了证实。这些发现鼓励了研究人员,尤其是德国和日本的研究人员,在 20 世纪 80 年代开发出选择性清除低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的体外设备。尽管目前可用的低密度脂蛋白清除装置的选择性不同,但一次治疗的低密度脂蛋白清除效果相当接近,介于治疗前低密度脂蛋白血浆浓度的 55% 到 65% 之间。90 年代,定期接受体外低密度脂蛋白清除、饮食和药物治疗的患者被纳入血管造影评估的回归研究中。研究表明,与单独使用药物和/或饮食相比,联合使用低密度脂蛋白清除术、饮食和药物治疗可减少冠状动脉病变的进展。不过,虽然趋势明显,但结果并未达到显著性标准。在过去的十年中,建立了血液透析登记处,以收集有关定期长期低密度脂蛋白血液透析的效率、安全性和临床结果的数据。对登记数据的评估必将有助于进一步了解这种既昂贵又耗时的治疗方法的治疗效果。此外,低密度脂蛋白清除疗法的未来将取决于高效新药和分子遗传学方法(如 RNA 沉默载脂蛋白 B 基因)的出现,而肝移植和低密度脂蛋白受体缺乏症的基因治疗在短期内不会取代严重家族性高胆固醇血症的低密度脂蛋白清除疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of lipid apheresis in changing times.

During the last decades, LDL-apheresis was established as an extracorporeal treatment option for patients with severe heterozygous or homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) that is resistant to conventional treatment strategies such as diet, drugs, and changes in lifestyle. Nearly half a century ago, the first LDL-apheresis treatment was performed by plasma exchange in a child with homozygous FH. At the beginning of the 1970s, the clinical advantage of regular extracorporeal LDL-elimination was demonstrated in siblings suffering from homozygous FH. These findings encouraged researchers especially from Germany and Japan to develop extracorporeal devices to selectively eliminate LDL-cholesterol in the 1980s. Although the selectivity of the currently available LDL-apheresis devices is different, the efficacy of LDL-elimination during a single treatment is rather similar and ranges between 55 and 65 % of the pretreatment LDL plasma concentration.In the 1990s, the patients regularly treated by extracorporeal LDL-elimination, diet, and drugs were included in regression studies assessed by angiography. It was shown that the combined treatment with LDL-apheresis, diet, and drugs resulted in less progression of coronary lesions than drugs and/or diet alone. However, although a tendency was evident, results did not reach criteria for significance. During the last decade, apheresis registries were established to collect data on efficiency, safety, and clinical outcome of regular long-term LDL-apheresis. The evaluation of registry data will certainly permit further insights in the therapeutic benefit of this expensive and time-consuming therapeutic approach. Furthermore, the future of LDL-apheresis will depend upon the availability of highly efficient new drugs and molecular genetic approaches such as RNA silencing of the apoB gene, whereas the liver transplantation and gene therapy of the LDL-receptor deficiency will not replace LDL-apheresis in severe familial hypercholesterolemia in the near future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lipoprotein apheresis is an optimal therapeutic option to reduce increased Lp(a) levels. Is lipoprotein(a) a risk factor for ischemic stroke and venous thromboembolism? Lipoprotein(a) and mortality-a high risk relationship. Lipoprotein(a) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. Lipoprotein(a)-an interdisciplinary challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1