注意差距:确定护理点诊断发展中的关键驱动因素的方法。

Q3 Nursing Point of Care Pub Date : 2012-06-01 DOI:10.1097/POC.0b013e31825a25fc
Joany Jackman, Manny Uy, Yu-Hsiang Hsieh, Anne Rompalo, Terry Hogan, Jill Huppert, Mary Jett-Goheen, Charlotte Gaydos
{"title":"注意差距:确定护理点诊断发展中的关键驱动因素的方法。","authors":"Joany Jackman,&nbsp;Manny Uy,&nbsp;Yu-Hsiang Hsieh,&nbsp;Anne Rompalo,&nbsp;Terry Hogan,&nbsp;Jill Huppert,&nbsp;Mary Jett-Goheen,&nbsp;Charlotte Gaydos","doi":"10.1097/POC.0b013e31825a25fc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>INTRODUCTION: A point of care test (POCT) for Chlamydia trachomatis detection is an urgent public health need. Technology advances in diagnostics have made solutions possible. Yet no reliable POCT exist. Our goal was to address the gap between chlamydia POCT needs and successful POCT development by determining which characteristics of POCT tests are most critical and if any flexibility in the attributes assigned those characteristics exist between technology developer and end user. METHODS: We employed a process known as WALEX (Warfare Analysis Laboratory Exercise) in combination with Design of Experiment (DOE) methodology using discrete choice experiments (DCE), to describe the attributes of the most realistic, rather than the most ideal POCT. The WALEX was conducted as interactive oral and simultaneous electronic discussion among experts with differing expertise, but linked by a common interest in development of a chlamydia POCT. RESULTS: Our studies demonstrated which features of the ideal chlamydia POCT were considered critical to test acceptance by users and which were open to negotiation. In particular, end users were more lenient on the requirement for the fastest ideal test and the lowest one time instrument costs, if the requirement for higher throughput, lowest cost and vaginal sample source collection were preserved. DOE methods used in forced choice question design provided confirmation of opinions derived from oral and electronic WALEX comments CONCLUSIONS: The WALEX in combination with DCE helped us achieve our goal in identifying the gaps in the chlamydia POCT and determining the most realistic solutions to bridge those gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":44085,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care","volume":"11 2","pages":"130-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/POC.0b013e31825a25fc","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minding the Gap: An approach to determine critical drivers in the development of Point of Care diagnostics.\",\"authors\":\"Joany Jackman,&nbsp;Manny Uy,&nbsp;Yu-Hsiang Hsieh,&nbsp;Anne Rompalo,&nbsp;Terry Hogan,&nbsp;Jill Huppert,&nbsp;Mary Jett-Goheen,&nbsp;Charlotte Gaydos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/POC.0b013e31825a25fc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>INTRODUCTION: A point of care test (POCT) for Chlamydia trachomatis detection is an urgent public health need. Technology advances in diagnostics have made solutions possible. Yet no reliable POCT exist. Our goal was to address the gap between chlamydia POCT needs and successful POCT development by determining which characteristics of POCT tests are most critical and if any flexibility in the attributes assigned those characteristics exist between technology developer and end user. METHODS: We employed a process known as WALEX (Warfare Analysis Laboratory Exercise) in combination with Design of Experiment (DOE) methodology using discrete choice experiments (DCE), to describe the attributes of the most realistic, rather than the most ideal POCT. The WALEX was conducted as interactive oral and simultaneous electronic discussion among experts with differing expertise, but linked by a common interest in development of a chlamydia POCT. RESULTS: Our studies demonstrated which features of the ideal chlamydia POCT were considered critical to test acceptance by users and which were open to negotiation. In particular, end users were more lenient on the requirement for the fastest ideal test and the lowest one time instrument costs, if the requirement for higher throughput, lowest cost and vaginal sample source collection were preserved. DOE methods used in forced choice question design provided confirmation of opinions derived from oral and electronic WALEX comments CONCLUSIONS: The WALEX in combination with DCE helped us achieve our goal in identifying the gaps in the chlamydia POCT and determining the most realistic solutions to bridge those gaps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Point of Care\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"130-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/POC.0b013e31825a25fc\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Point of Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0b013e31825a25fc\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0b013e31825a25fc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要:针对沙眼衣原体检测的护理点检测(POCT)是一项迫切的公共卫生需求。诊断技术的进步使解决方案成为可能。然而,目前还不存在可靠的POCT。我们的目标是解决衣原体POCT需求与成功POCT开发之间的差距,确定POCT测试的哪些特征是最关键的,以及技术开发人员和最终用户之间是否存在分配这些特征属性的灵活性。方法:我们采用一种称为WALEX(战争分析实验室演习)的过程,结合使用离散选择实验(DCE)的实验设计(DOE)方法,来描述最现实的属性,而不是最理想的POCT。WALEX是在具有不同专业知识的专家之间进行交互式口头和同步电子讨论,但由于对衣原体POCT发展的共同兴趣而联系在一起。结果:我们的研究表明,理想的衣原体POCT的哪些特征被认为是用户接受测试的关键,哪些特征是可以协商的。特别是,如果保留对更高通量、最低成本和阴道样本来源收集的要求,最终用户对最快理想测试和最低一次性仪器成本的要求更为宽松。强制选择题设计中使用的DOE方法证实了来自口头和电子WALEX评论的意见。结论:WALEX与DCE的结合帮助我们实现了识别衣原体POCT的差距并确定弥合这些差距的最现实解决方案的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minding the Gap: An approach to determine critical drivers in the development of Point of Care diagnostics.

INTRODUCTION: A point of care test (POCT) for Chlamydia trachomatis detection is an urgent public health need. Technology advances in diagnostics have made solutions possible. Yet no reliable POCT exist. Our goal was to address the gap between chlamydia POCT needs and successful POCT development by determining which characteristics of POCT tests are most critical and if any flexibility in the attributes assigned those characteristics exist between technology developer and end user. METHODS: We employed a process known as WALEX (Warfare Analysis Laboratory Exercise) in combination with Design of Experiment (DOE) methodology using discrete choice experiments (DCE), to describe the attributes of the most realistic, rather than the most ideal POCT. The WALEX was conducted as interactive oral and simultaneous electronic discussion among experts with differing expertise, but linked by a common interest in development of a chlamydia POCT. RESULTS: Our studies demonstrated which features of the ideal chlamydia POCT were considered critical to test acceptance by users and which were open to negotiation. In particular, end users were more lenient on the requirement for the fastest ideal test and the lowest one time instrument costs, if the requirement for higher throughput, lowest cost and vaginal sample source collection were preserved. DOE methods used in forced choice question design provided confirmation of opinions derived from oral and electronic WALEX comments CONCLUSIONS: The WALEX in combination with DCE helped us achieve our goal in identifying the gaps in the chlamydia POCT and determining the most realistic solutions to bridge those gaps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Point of Care
Point of Care MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology is a vital resource for directors and managers of large and small hospital pathology labs, blood centers, home health-care agencies, doctors" offices, and other healthcare facilities. Each issue brings you peer-reviewed original research articles, along with concepts, technologies and trends, covering topics that include: Test accuracy Turnaround time Data management Quality control Regulatory compliance Cost-effectiveness of testing
期刊最新文献
Patient Preferences for Point-of-Care Testing: Survey Validation and Results. Overcoming Challenges with the Adoption of Point-of-Care Testing: From Technology Push and Clinical Needs to Value Propositions. Toward Improving Accessibility of Point-of-Care Diagnostic Services for Maternal and Child Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Central Vietnam: International Exchange, Needs Assessment, and Spatial Care Paths. Healthcare worker feedback on a prototype smartphone-based point-of-care test platform for use in episodic care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1