Erisa抢占。金诉蓝十字蓝盾案,439联邦快递。386, 2011 WL 3822023(2011年第5期)。ERISA优先权甚至适用于以前的受益人,或者那些福利被计划取消的人,只要索赔与计划有关。

Benefits quarterly Pub Date : 2012-01-01
{"title":"Erisa抢占。金诉蓝十字蓝盾案,439联邦快递。386, 2011 WL 3822023(2011年第5期)。ERISA优先权甚至适用于以前的受益人,或者那些福利被计划取消的人,只要索赔与计划有关。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":79563,"journal":{"name":"Benefits quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erisa preemption. King v. BlueCross BlueShield, 439 Fed.Appx. 386, 2011 WL 3822023 (5th Cir. 2011). ERISA preemption applies even to former beneficiaries, or those whose benefits have been canceled by a plan, as long as the claims relate to the plan.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":79563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Benefits quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Benefits quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benefits quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Erisa preemption. King v. BlueCross BlueShield, 439 Fed.Appx. 386, 2011 WL 3822023 (5th Cir. 2011). ERISA preemption applies even to former beneficiaries, or those whose benefits have been canceled by a plan, as long as the claims relate to the plan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opioid Addiction and Implications for Employers. How Perceptions of Mental Illness Impact EAP Utilization. Pharmacogenetic Testing May Improve Drug Treatments and Shorten Disability Leaves. Return-to-Work Strategies for Employees With Mental Health Conditions. Bringing Workforce Health to the Top Line-Expanding the Value Proposition for Workforce Health Improvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1