浆细胞骨髓瘤的表型一致标记。

The Korean Journal of Hematology Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-12-24 DOI:10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.239
Mina Hur
{"title":"浆细胞骨髓瘤的表型一致标记。","authors":"Mina Hur","doi":"10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The clinical relevance of flow cytometric immunophenotyping (FCM) has been established in the diagnosis, classification, and monitoring of disease in monoclonal gammopathies [1, 2]. Clinical application of FCM encompasses differential diagnosis of malignant plasma cell disorder from reactive plasmacytosis, identifying the progression risk in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and in asymptomatic plasma cell myeloma, and minimal residual disease detection [1, 3]. Although most of the plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma are neoplastic myeloma cells, a small percentage of normal or reactive plasma cells remain, which are responsible for maintaining normal immune function [4]. Reactive plasma cells are characterized by low forward/side scatter (FSC/SCC) and high CD38 expression together with a CD19+/CD56- phenotype. On the contrary, neoplastic myeloma cells are CD19-/CD56+ or CD56-, with high FSC/SCC and relatively low CD38 expression [5-7]. \n \nThe most commonly used antigens for the detection of neoplastic and normal plasma cells include CD19, CD56, CD20, CD117, CD28, CD33, CD27, CD81, CD31, CD39, CD40, CD44, cyclin D1, and CD34. It is impossible to define plasma cells as being phenotypically abnormal using only one test antigen either at diagnosis or after treatment, and there has been no study to identify the minimum requirements for reproducible detection of minimal residual disease [3]. According to the European Myeloma Network report, CD38, CD138, and CD45 should all be included in at least one tube for plasma cell identification and enumeration, and the primary gate should be based on CD38 vs. CD138 expression. The combined use of CD19 and CD56 was suggested as a minimal panel for the detection of abnormal plasma cells, which can be applicable to at least 90% of patients with multiple myeloma. A preferred panel that includes CD20, CD117, CD28, and CD27 was also suggested, which can be applicable to more than 95% of such patients [3]. \n \nIn the current issue of the Korean Journal of Hematology, Jeong et al. report a simplified FCM panel for multiple myeloma [8]. The authors suggest that a simplified immunophenotypic panel, CD56/CD19/CD138 (CD38)/CD45, is useful for distinguishing neoplastic myeloma cells from reactive plasma cells at diagnosis and during follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma. They also demonstrate that the negative expression of CD19 is the most valuable tool for identifying neoplastic myeloma cells in these patients. \n \nThe construction of an immunophenotypic panel for the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma is a matter of choice in the clinical laboratory. From a practical point of view, it would be ideal if a simple but cost-effective panel were applicable to almost all cases. In this regard, the study by Jeong et al. provides a practical solution that can be used both for the primary gating and for the differentiation between neoplastic myeloma cells and reactive plasma cells. The usefulness of this simplified immunophenotypic panel should be evaluated in various applications for multiple myeloma.","PeriodicalId":23001,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.239","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenotypic consensus markers for plasma cell myeloma.\",\"authors\":\"Mina Hur\",\"doi\":\"10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The clinical relevance of flow cytometric immunophenotyping (FCM) has been established in the diagnosis, classification, and monitoring of disease in monoclonal gammopathies [1, 2]. Clinical application of FCM encompasses differential diagnosis of malignant plasma cell disorder from reactive plasmacytosis, identifying the progression risk in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and in asymptomatic plasma cell myeloma, and minimal residual disease detection [1, 3]. Although most of the plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma are neoplastic myeloma cells, a small percentage of normal or reactive plasma cells remain, which are responsible for maintaining normal immune function [4]. Reactive plasma cells are characterized by low forward/side scatter (FSC/SCC) and high CD38 expression together with a CD19+/CD56- phenotype. On the contrary, neoplastic myeloma cells are CD19-/CD56+ or CD56-, with high FSC/SCC and relatively low CD38 expression [5-7]. \\n \\nThe most commonly used antigens for the detection of neoplastic and normal plasma cells include CD19, CD56, CD20, CD117, CD28, CD33, CD27, CD81, CD31, CD39, CD40, CD44, cyclin D1, and CD34. It is impossible to define plasma cells as being phenotypically abnormal using only one test antigen either at diagnosis or after treatment, and there has been no study to identify the minimum requirements for reproducible detection of minimal residual disease [3]. According to the European Myeloma Network report, CD38, CD138, and CD45 should all be included in at least one tube for plasma cell identification and enumeration, and the primary gate should be based on CD38 vs. CD138 expression. The combined use of CD19 and CD56 was suggested as a minimal panel for the detection of abnormal plasma cells, which can be applicable to at least 90% of patients with multiple myeloma. A preferred panel that includes CD20, CD117, CD28, and CD27 was also suggested, which can be applicable to more than 95% of such patients [3]. \\n \\nIn the current issue of the Korean Journal of Hematology, Jeong et al. report a simplified FCM panel for multiple myeloma [8]. The authors suggest that a simplified immunophenotypic panel, CD56/CD19/CD138 (CD38)/CD45, is useful for distinguishing neoplastic myeloma cells from reactive plasma cells at diagnosis and during follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma. They also demonstrate that the negative expression of CD19 is the most valuable tool for identifying neoplastic myeloma cells in these patients. \\n \\nThe construction of an immunophenotypic panel for the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma is a matter of choice in the clinical laboratory. From a practical point of view, it would be ideal if a simple but cost-effective panel were applicable to almost all cases. In this regard, the study by Jeong et al. provides a practical solution that can be used both for the primary gating and for the differentiation between neoplastic myeloma cells and reactive plasma cells. The usefulness of this simplified immunophenotypic panel should be evaluated in various applications for multiple myeloma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Journal of Hematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.239\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Journal of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/12/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Phenotypic consensus markers for plasma cell myeloma.
The clinical relevance of flow cytometric immunophenotyping (FCM) has been established in the diagnosis, classification, and monitoring of disease in monoclonal gammopathies [1, 2]. Clinical application of FCM encompasses differential diagnosis of malignant plasma cell disorder from reactive plasmacytosis, identifying the progression risk in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and in asymptomatic plasma cell myeloma, and minimal residual disease detection [1, 3]. Although most of the plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma are neoplastic myeloma cells, a small percentage of normal or reactive plasma cells remain, which are responsible for maintaining normal immune function [4]. Reactive plasma cells are characterized by low forward/side scatter (FSC/SCC) and high CD38 expression together with a CD19+/CD56- phenotype. On the contrary, neoplastic myeloma cells are CD19-/CD56+ or CD56-, with high FSC/SCC and relatively low CD38 expression [5-7]. The most commonly used antigens for the detection of neoplastic and normal plasma cells include CD19, CD56, CD20, CD117, CD28, CD33, CD27, CD81, CD31, CD39, CD40, CD44, cyclin D1, and CD34. It is impossible to define plasma cells as being phenotypically abnormal using only one test antigen either at diagnosis or after treatment, and there has been no study to identify the minimum requirements for reproducible detection of minimal residual disease [3]. According to the European Myeloma Network report, CD38, CD138, and CD45 should all be included in at least one tube for plasma cell identification and enumeration, and the primary gate should be based on CD38 vs. CD138 expression. The combined use of CD19 and CD56 was suggested as a minimal panel for the detection of abnormal plasma cells, which can be applicable to at least 90% of patients with multiple myeloma. A preferred panel that includes CD20, CD117, CD28, and CD27 was also suggested, which can be applicable to more than 95% of such patients [3]. In the current issue of the Korean Journal of Hematology, Jeong et al. report a simplified FCM panel for multiple myeloma [8]. The authors suggest that a simplified immunophenotypic panel, CD56/CD19/CD138 (CD38)/CD45, is useful for distinguishing neoplastic myeloma cells from reactive plasma cells at diagnosis and during follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma. They also demonstrate that the negative expression of CD19 is the most valuable tool for identifying neoplastic myeloma cells in these patients. The construction of an immunophenotypic panel for the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma is a matter of choice in the clinical laboratory. From a practical point of view, it would be ideal if a simple but cost-effective panel were applicable to almost all cases. In this regard, the study by Jeong et al. provides a practical solution that can be used both for the primary gating and for the differentiation between neoplastic myeloma cells and reactive plasma cells. The usefulness of this simplified immunophenotypic panel should be evaluated in various applications for multiple myeloma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long-term survival of a patient with bone marrow gelatinous degeneration of idiopathic origin. Simplified flow cytometric immunophenotyping panel for multiple myeloma, CD56/CD19/CD138(CD38)/CD45, to differentiate neoplastic myeloma cells from reactive plasma cells. Prognostic significance of gelsolin and MMP12 in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is a critical prognostic factor for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Surgery in patients with congenital factor VII deficiency: A single center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1