紫光与红外线联合使用以及紫光仅能有效抑制多重耐药菌的存活

Areli Martinez , Karina Hernandez-Quijada , Anurupa A. Ghosh , Gabriela Cabrera , Derrick Scott , Anthea Aikins , Dinesh K. Verma , Igsoo Kwon , Yong-Hwan Kim
{"title":"紫光与红外线联合使用以及紫光仅能有效抑制多重耐药菌的存活","authors":"Areli Martinez ,&nbsp;Karina Hernandez-Quijada ,&nbsp;Anurupa A. Ghosh ,&nbsp;Gabriela Cabrera ,&nbsp;Derrick Scott ,&nbsp;Anthea Aikins ,&nbsp;Dinesh K. Verma ,&nbsp;Igsoo Kwon ,&nbsp;Yong-Hwan Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jpap.2023.100167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since recent global pandemic started, there has been a high demand for establishing an inexpensive but effective method to interfere with the spread of infectious diseases. Here, we have tested several combinations of violet light (V, 405 nm) with infra-red (IR, 850 nm) to identify an optimal light for suppressing pathogens. Our results demonstrate that both violet only (4 V) and 3V-1IR (3:1 ratio in combination of violet and infra-red) effectively suppressed all the bacterial growth tested, including Gram-negative and -positive multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains. Both 4 V and 3V-1IR equally terminated standard strains of <em>Escherichia coli</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, as well as MDR-strains (<em>E. coli, Salmonella enterica</em> and <em>S. aureus</em> from ATCC) effectively. In mechanism, the violet light enhanced the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) for bactericidal effects, however, we have observed a slightly higher potency from 3V-1IR at a shorter distance, probably due to mild heat-derived dehydration by IR. Therefore, we suggest to expose 3V-1IR for short distance applications (≤1 meter) and both 4 V and 3V-1IR for longer distance (≥1 m). Notably, our results strongly suggest that the exposure of safe violet light or with infra-red can be an effective method to suppress the potential spread of bacteria-derived infectious diseases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2610,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The combination of violet light and infra-red as well as violet light only effectively suppress the survival of multiple-drug resistant bacteria\",\"authors\":\"Areli Martinez ,&nbsp;Karina Hernandez-Quijada ,&nbsp;Anurupa A. Ghosh ,&nbsp;Gabriela Cabrera ,&nbsp;Derrick Scott ,&nbsp;Anthea Aikins ,&nbsp;Dinesh K. Verma ,&nbsp;Igsoo Kwon ,&nbsp;Yong-Hwan Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpap.2023.100167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Since recent global pandemic started, there has been a high demand for establishing an inexpensive but effective method to interfere with the spread of infectious diseases. Here, we have tested several combinations of violet light (V, 405 nm) with infra-red (IR, 850 nm) to identify an optimal light for suppressing pathogens. Our results demonstrate that both violet only (4 V) and 3V-1IR (3:1 ratio in combination of violet and infra-red) effectively suppressed all the bacterial growth tested, including Gram-negative and -positive multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains. Both 4 V and 3V-1IR equally terminated standard strains of <em>Escherichia coli</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, as well as MDR-strains (<em>E. coli, Salmonella enterica</em> and <em>S. aureus</em> from ATCC) effectively. In mechanism, the violet light enhanced the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) for bactericidal effects, however, we have observed a slightly higher potency from 3V-1IR at a shorter distance, probably due to mild heat-derived dehydration by IR. Therefore, we suggest to expose 3V-1IR for short distance applications (≤1 meter) and both 4 V and 3V-1IR for longer distance (≥1 m). Notably, our results strongly suggest that the exposure of safe violet light or with infra-red can be an effective method to suppress the potential spread of bacteria-derived infectious diseases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2610,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"2\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666469023000088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666469023000088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自最近的全球大流行病开始以来,人们一直高度要求建立一种廉价但有效的方法来干扰传染病的传播。在这里,我们测试了紫光(V, 405 nm)和红外光(IR, 850 nm)的几种组合,以确定抑制病原体的最佳光。结果表明,紫外光(4v)和3V-1IR(3:1的紫外光和红外线组合比例)均能有效抑制所有细菌的生长,包括革兰氏阴性和阳性多药耐药(MDR)菌株。4v和3V-1IR均能有效终止大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌标准菌株,以及耐多药菌株(ATCC的大肠杆菌、肠炎沙门氏菌和金黄色葡萄球菌)。在机理上,紫光增强了活性氧(ROS)的杀菌作用,然而,我们观察到3V-1IR在较短距离下的效价略高,可能是由于红外的轻度热致脱水。因此,我们建议短距离(≤1米)暴露3V-1IR,远距离(≥1米)暴露4v和3V-1IR。值得注意的是,我们的研究结果强烈表明,安全紫光或红外线暴露是抑制细菌源性传染病潜在传播的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The combination of violet light and infra-red as well as violet light only effectively suppress the survival of multiple-drug resistant bacteria

Since recent global pandemic started, there has been a high demand for establishing an inexpensive but effective method to interfere with the spread of infectious diseases. Here, we have tested several combinations of violet light (V, 405 nm) with infra-red (IR, 850 nm) to identify an optimal light for suppressing pathogens. Our results demonstrate that both violet only (4 V) and 3V-1IR (3:1 ratio in combination of violet and infra-red) effectively suppressed all the bacterial growth tested, including Gram-negative and -positive multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains. Both 4 V and 3V-1IR equally terminated standard strains of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, as well as MDR-strains (E. coli, Salmonella enterica and S. aureus from ATCC) effectively. In mechanism, the violet light enhanced the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) for bactericidal effects, however, we have observed a slightly higher potency from 3V-1IR at a shorter distance, probably due to mild heat-derived dehydration by IR. Therefore, we suggest to expose 3V-1IR for short distance applications (≤1 meter) and both 4 V and 3V-1IR for longer distance (≥1 m). Notably, our results strongly suggest that the exposure of safe violet light or with infra-red can be an effective method to suppress the potential spread of bacteria-derived infectious diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An interplay of light and temperature: Vitamin D3 formation in vitro, a model for in vivo plant studies Strategies for overcoming the lung surfactant barrier and achieving success in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy In vivo measurement of nitric oxide release from intact human skin post photobiomodulation using visible and near-infrared light: A chemiluminescence detection study Adaption of in vitro and in chemico phototoxicity tests for tattoo pigments and the effect of adsorption of the phototoxic contaminant benzo[a]pyrene to carbon black Dedicated to Professor Kazuhiko Mizuno on the occasion of his 75th birthday celebration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1