Jay D. Currie PharmD (associate professor), William R. Doucette PhD (associate professor), Julie Kuhle BSPharm (senior vice president), Jenelle Sobotka PharmD (manager), William A. Miller MSc, PharmD (professor), Randal P. McDonough MS, PharmD (associate professor), Angela L. Tice PharmD (assistant professor)
{"title":"鉴定药剂师提供的护理文件中的基本要素","authors":"Jay D. Currie PharmD (associate professor), William R. Doucette PhD (associate professor), Julie Kuhle BSPharm (senior vice president), Jenelle Sobotka PharmD (manager), William A. Miller MSc, PharmD (professor), Randal P. McDonough MS, PharmD (associate professor), Angela L. Tice PharmD (assistant professor)","doi":"10.1331/10865800360467033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To develop guidelines for the documentation elements that need to be included in any record of pharmacist-provided care to allow the quality of the care to be assessed and to describe the use of these guidelines to improve the quality of pharmacist documentation.</p></div><div><h3>Design:</h3><p>An initial list of 85 potential documentation elements, developed through a review of the literature, was validated by a group of pharmacy practitioners. Then, through three rounds of a Delphi process and a group meeting, a panel of experts reached consensus on a refined list of 27 documentation data elements.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>The documentation elements were formatted into a one-page Tool for Evaluation of Documentation (TED). The TED is a checklist for assessing the completeness of the documentation of pharmacist-provided care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>The TED and the consensus-building methodology used in the development of this tool can serve as cornerstones of a quality assessment process for documentation of pharmacist-provided care, enable further assessment of the quality of care, and, ultimately, be used to measure the impact of pharmacist-provided care on patient outcomes. Our results should provide guidance both to pharmacists providing care and to organizations that assess the quality of that care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)","volume":"43 1","pages":"Pages 41-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1331/10865800360467033","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Essential Elements in the Documentation of Pharmacist-Provided Care\",\"authors\":\"Jay D. Currie PharmD (associate professor), William R. Doucette PhD (associate professor), Julie Kuhle BSPharm (senior vice president), Jenelle Sobotka PharmD (manager), William A. Miller MSc, PharmD (professor), Randal P. McDonough MS, PharmD (associate professor), Angela L. Tice PharmD (assistant professor)\",\"doi\":\"10.1331/10865800360467033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To develop guidelines for the documentation elements that need to be included in any record of pharmacist-provided care to allow the quality of the care to be assessed and to describe the use of these guidelines to improve the quality of pharmacist documentation.</p></div><div><h3>Design:</h3><p>An initial list of 85 potential documentation elements, developed through a review of the literature, was validated by a group of pharmacy practitioners. Then, through three rounds of a Delphi process and a group meeting, a panel of experts reached consensus on a refined list of 27 documentation data elements.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>The documentation elements were formatted into a one-page Tool for Evaluation of Documentation (TED). The TED is a checklist for assessing the completeness of the documentation of pharmacist-provided care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>The TED and the consensus-building methodology used in the development of this tool can serve as cornerstones of a quality assessment process for documentation of pharmacist-provided care, enable further assessment of the quality of care, and, ultimately, be used to measure the impact of pharmacist-provided care on patient outcomes. Our results should provide guidance both to pharmacists providing care and to organizations that assess the quality of that care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 41-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1331/10865800360467033\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1086580215300747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Washington, D.C. : 1996)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1086580215300747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identification of Essential Elements in the Documentation of Pharmacist-Provided Care
To develop guidelines for the documentation elements that need to be included in any record of pharmacist-provided care to allow the quality of the care to be assessed and to describe the use of these guidelines to improve the quality of pharmacist documentation.
Design:
An initial list of 85 potential documentation elements, developed through a review of the literature, was validated by a group of pharmacy practitioners. Then, through three rounds of a Delphi process and a group meeting, a panel of experts reached consensus on a refined list of 27 documentation data elements.
Results:
The documentation elements were formatted into a one-page Tool for Evaluation of Documentation (TED). The TED is a checklist for assessing the completeness of the documentation of pharmacist-provided care.
Conclusion:
The TED and the consensus-building methodology used in the development of this tool can serve as cornerstones of a quality assessment process for documentation of pharmacist-provided care, enable further assessment of the quality of care, and, ultimately, be used to measure the impact of pharmacist-provided care on patient outcomes. Our results should provide guidance both to pharmacists providing care and to organizations that assess the quality of that care.