对人类或动物种群构成生物恐怖主义威胁的物质制定比较风险排名系统。

Katharina Tomuzia, Andrea Menrath, Hendrik Frentzel, Matthias Filter, Armin A Weiser, Juliane Bräunig, Anja Buschulte, Bernd Appel
{"title":"对人类或动物种群构成生物恐怖主义威胁的物质制定比较风险排名系统。","authors":"Katharina Tomuzia,&nbsp;Andrea Menrath,&nbsp;Hendrik Frentzel,&nbsp;Matthias Filter,&nbsp;Armin A Weiser,&nbsp;Juliane Bräunig,&nbsp;Anja Buschulte,&nbsp;Bernd Appel","doi":"10.1089/bsp.2012.0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various systems for prioritizing biological agents with respect to their applicability as biological weapons are available, ranging from qualitative to (semi)quantitative approaches. This research aimed at generating a generic risk ranking system applicable to human and animal pathogenic agents based on scientific information. Criteria were evaluated and clustered to create a criteria list. Considering availability of data, a number of 28 criteria separated by content were identified that can be classified in 11 thematic areas or categories. Relevant categories contributing to probability were historical aspects, accessibility, production efforts, and possible paths for dispersion. Categories associated with impact are dealing with containment measures, availability of diagnostics, preventive and treatment measures in human and animal populations, impact on society, human and veterinary public health, and economic and ecological consequences. To allow data-based scoring, each criterion was described by at least 1 measure that allows the assignment of values. These values constitute quantities, ranges, or facts that are as explicit and precise as possible. The consideration of minimum and maximum values that can occur due to natural variations and that are often described in the literature led to the development of minimum and maximum criteria and consequently category scores. Missing or incomplete data, and uncertainty resulting therefrom, were integrated into the scheme via a cautious (but not overcautious) approach. The visualization technique that was used allows the description and illustration of uncertainty on the level of probability and impact. The developed risk ranking system was evaluated by assessing the risk originating from the bioterrorism threat of the animal pathogen bluetongue virus, the human pathogen Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7, the zoonotic Bacillus anthracis, and Botulinum neurotoxin. </p>","PeriodicalId":87059,"journal":{"name":"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science","volume":"11 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S3-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/bsp.2012.0070","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a comparative risk ranking system for agents posing a bioterrorism threat to human or animal populations.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Tomuzia,&nbsp;Andrea Menrath,&nbsp;Hendrik Frentzel,&nbsp;Matthias Filter,&nbsp;Armin A Weiser,&nbsp;Juliane Bräunig,&nbsp;Anja Buschulte,&nbsp;Bernd Appel\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/bsp.2012.0070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Various systems for prioritizing biological agents with respect to their applicability as biological weapons are available, ranging from qualitative to (semi)quantitative approaches. This research aimed at generating a generic risk ranking system applicable to human and animal pathogenic agents based on scientific information. Criteria were evaluated and clustered to create a criteria list. Considering availability of data, a number of 28 criteria separated by content were identified that can be classified in 11 thematic areas or categories. Relevant categories contributing to probability were historical aspects, accessibility, production efforts, and possible paths for dispersion. Categories associated with impact are dealing with containment measures, availability of diagnostics, preventive and treatment measures in human and animal populations, impact on society, human and veterinary public health, and economic and ecological consequences. To allow data-based scoring, each criterion was described by at least 1 measure that allows the assignment of values. These values constitute quantities, ranges, or facts that are as explicit and precise as possible. The consideration of minimum and maximum values that can occur due to natural variations and that are often described in the literature led to the development of minimum and maximum criteria and consequently category scores. Missing or incomplete data, and uncertainty resulting therefrom, were integrated into the scheme via a cautious (but not overcautious) approach. The visualization technique that was used allows the description and illustration of uncertainty on the level of probability and impact. The developed risk ranking system was evaluated by assessing the risk originating from the bioterrorism threat of the animal pathogen bluetongue virus, the human pathogen Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7, the zoonotic Bacillus anthracis, and Botulinum neurotoxin. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science\",\"volume\":\"11 Suppl 1 \",\"pages\":\"S3-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/bsp.2012.0070\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2012.0070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2012.0070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

根据生物制剂作为生物武器的适用性确定其优先次序的系统有多种,从定性方法到(半)定量方法不等。本研究旨在建立一个基于科学信息的适用于人类和动物病原体的通用风险排序系统。对标准进行评估和聚类,以创建一个标准列表。考虑到数据的可得性,确定了按内容划分的28项标准,可分为11个专题领域或类别。对概率有贡献的相关类别是历史方面、可及性、生产努力和可能的分散路径。与影响相关的类别涉及控制措施、诊断方法的可得性、对人类和动物群体的预防和治疗措施、对社会的影响、人类和兽医公共卫生以及经济和生态后果。为了允许基于数据的评分,每个标准由至少一个允许值分配的度量来描述。这些值构成数量、范围或事实,尽可能明确和精确。考虑到由于自然变化而可能出现的最小值和最大值,并且经常在文献中描述,导致了最小值和最大值标准的发展,从而导致了类别得分。缺失或不完整的数据,以及由此产生的不确定性,通过谨慎(但不是过度谨慎)的方法整合到方案中。所使用的可视化技术允许在概率和影响层面上描述和说明不确定性。通过对动物致病菌蓝舌病病毒、人类致病菌肠出血性大肠杆菌O157:H7、人畜共患炭疽芽孢杆菌和肉毒杆菌神经毒素等生物恐怖威胁的风险进行评估,对所建立的风险排序系统进行评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a comparative risk ranking system for agents posing a bioterrorism threat to human or animal populations.

Various systems for prioritizing biological agents with respect to their applicability as biological weapons are available, ranging from qualitative to (semi)quantitative approaches. This research aimed at generating a generic risk ranking system applicable to human and animal pathogenic agents based on scientific information. Criteria were evaluated and clustered to create a criteria list. Considering availability of data, a number of 28 criteria separated by content were identified that can be classified in 11 thematic areas or categories. Relevant categories contributing to probability were historical aspects, accessibility, production efforts, and possible paths for dispersion. Categories associated with impact are dealing with containment measures, availability of diagnostics, preventive and treatment measures in human and animal populations, impact on society, human and veterinary public health, and economic and ecological consequences. To allow data-based scoring, each criterion was described by at least 1 measure that allows the assignment of values. These values constitute quantities, ranges, or facts that are as explicit and precise as possible. The consideration of minimum and maximum values that can occur due to natural variations and that are often described in the literature led to the development of minimum and maximum criteria and consequently category scores. Missing or incomplete data, and uncertainty resulting therefrom, were integrated into the scheme via a cautious (but not overcautious) approach. The visualization technique that was used allows the description and illustration of uncertainty on the level of probability and impact. The developed risk ranking system was evaluated by assessing the risk originating from the bioterrorism threat of the animal pathogen bluetongue virus, the human pathogen Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7, the zoonotic Bacillus anthracis, and Botulinum neurotoxin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Aspects of Biosecurity Response at the State and Local Level Biosecurity Programs and Assets Future Directions for Biosecurity Seeds of Destruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1