Cristóbal Carnero-Pardo, Isabel Cruz-Orduña, Beatriz Espejo-Martínez, Carolina Martos-Aparicio, Samuel López-Alcalde, Javier Olazarán
{"title":"mini-cog在初级保健中检测认知障碍的效用:来自两项西班牙研究的数据。","authors":"Cristóbal Carnero-Pardo, Isabel Cruz-Orduña, Beatriz Espejo-Martínez, Carolina Martos-Aparicio, Samuel López-Alcalde, Javier Olazarán","doi":"10.1155/2013/285462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives. To study the utility of the Mini-Cog test for detection of patients with cognitive impairment (CI) in primary care (PC). Methods. We pooled data from two phase III studies conducted in Spain. Patients with complaints or suspicion of CI were consecutively recruited by PC physicians. The cognitive diagnosis was performed by an expert neurologist, after formal neuropsychological evaluation. The Mini-Cog score was calculated post hoc, and its diagnostic utility was evaluated and compared with the utility of the Mini-Mental State (MMS), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and the sum of the MMS and the CDT (MMS + CDT) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The best cut points were obtained on the basis of diagnostic accuracy (DA) and kappa index. Results. A total sample of 307 subjects (176 CI) was analyzed. The Mini-Cog displayed an AUC (±SE) of 0.78 ± 0.02, which was significantly inferior to the AUC of the CDT (0.84 ± 0.02), the MMS (0.84 ± 0.02), and the MMS + CDT (0.86 ± 0.02). The best cut point of the Mini-Cog was 1/2 (sensitivity 0.60, specificity 0.90, DA 0.73, and kappa index 0.48 ± 0.05). Conclusions. The utility of the Mini-Cog for detection of CI in PC was very modest, clearly inferior to the MMS or the CDT. These results do not permit recommendation of the Mini-Cog in PC. </p>","PeriodicalId":13802,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"2013 ","pages":"285462"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/285462","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of the mini-cog for detection of cognitive impairment in primary care: data from two spanish studies.\",\"authors\":\"Cristóbal Carnero-Pardo, Isabel Cruz-Orduña, Beatriz Espejo-Martínez, Carolina Martos-Aparicio, Samuel López-Alcalde, Javier Olazarán\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/285462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives. To study the utility of the Mini-Cog test for detection of patients with cognitive impairment (CI) in primary care (PC). Methods. We pooled data from two phase III studies conducted in Spain. Patients with complaints or suspicion of CI were consecutively recruited by PC physicians. The cognitive diagnosis was performed by an expert neurologist, after formal neuropsychological evaluation. The Mini-Cog score was calculated post hoc, and its diagnostic utility was evaluated and compared with the utility of the Mini-Mental State (MMS), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and the sum of the MMS and the CDT (MMS + CDT) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The best cut points were obtained on the basis of diagnostic accuracy (DA) and kappa index. Results. A total sample of 307 subjects (176 CI) was analyzed. The Mini-Cog displayed an AUC (±SE) of 0.78 ± 0.02, which was significantly inferior to the AUC of the CDT (0.84 ± 0.02), the MMS (0.84 ± 0.02), and the MMS + CDT (0.86 ± 0.02). The best cut point of the Mini-Cog was 1/2 (sensitivity 0.60, specificity 0.90, DA 0.73, and kappa index 0.48 ± 0.05). Conclusions. The utility of the Mini-Cog for detection of CI in PC was very modest, clearly inferior to the MMS or the CDT. These results do not permit recommendation of the Mini-Cog in PC. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"285462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/285462\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/285462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/285462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49
摘要
目标。目的:探讨Mini-Cog试验在初级保健(PC)患者认知功能障碍(CI)检测中的应用价值。方法。我们汇集了在西班牙进行的两项III期研究的数据。主诉或怀疑CI的患者由PC医师连续招募。认知诊断是在正式的神经心理学评估后由一位神经专家进行的。事后计算Mini-Cog评分,评估其诊断效用,并与Mini-Mental State (MMS)、Clock Drawing Test (CDT)和MMS与CDT的总和(MMS + CDT)的效用进行比较,采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。根据诊断准确度(DA)和kappa指数确定最佳切点。结果。共分析307例受试者(176 CI)。Mini-Cog的AUC(±SE)为0.78±0.02,明显低于CDT(0.84±0.02)、MMS(0.84±0.02)和MMS + CDT(0.86±0.02)的AUC。Mini-Cog的最佳切割点为1/2(敏感性0.60,特异性0.90,DA 0.73, kappa指数0.48±0.05)。结论。Mini-Cog在PC中检测CI的效用非常有限,明显不如MMS或CDT。这些结果不允许在PC中推荐Mini-Cog。
Utility of the mini-cog for detection of cognitive impairment in primary care: data from two spanish studies.
Objectives. To study the utility of the Mini-Cog test for detection of patients with cognitive impairment (CI) in primary care (PC). Methods. We pooled data from two phase III studies conducted in Spain. Patients with complaints or suspicion of CI were consecutively recruited by PC physicians. The cognitive diagnosis was performed by an expert neurologist, after formal neuropsychological evaluation. The Mini-Cog score was calculated post hoc, and its diagnostic utility was evaluated and compared with the utility of the Mini-Mental State (MMS), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and the sum of the MMS and the CDT (MMS + CDT) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The best cut points were obtained on the basis of diagnostic accuracy (DA) and kappa index. Results. A total sample of 307 subjects (176 CI) was analyzed. The Mini-Cog displayed an AUC (±SE) of 0.78 ± 0.02, which was significantly inferior to the AUC of the CDT (0.84 ± 0.02), the MMS (0.84 ± 0.02), and the MMS + CDT (0.86 ± 0.02). The best cut point of the Mini-Cog was 1/2 (sensitivity 0.60, specificity 0.90, DA 0.73, and kappa index 0.48 ± 0.05). Conclusions. The utility of the Mini-Cog for detection of CI in PC was very modest, clearly inferior to the MMS or the CDT. These results do not permit recommendation of the Mini-Cog in PC.