Alexandra Karadimou, Evangelos Lianos, Dimitrios Pectasides, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Aristotle Bamias
{"title":"甲氨蝶呤/长春花碱/阿霉素顺铂联合治疗吉西他滨预处理的晚期尿路上皮癌的疗效:回顾性分析","authors":"Alexandra Karadimou, Evangelos Lianos, Dimitrios Pectasides, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Aristotle Bamias","doi":"10.2147/OAJU.S13122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Second-line treatment options in advanced urothelial cancer are limited. We investigated the efficacy of a methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC) combination after failure of gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty-five patients with advanced urothelial cancer, who received second-line MVAC after first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin (n = 9) or gemcitabine/carboplatin (n = 16), were included in this retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients (88%) relapsed within 6 months after first-line treatment. Following MVAC, there were 5 (20%) objective responses. Median follow-up was 20.2 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.3-5.2), and median overall survival (OS) was 9 months (95% CI: 6.6-11.4). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0.1 versus 2 was associated with longer PFS (5 months versus 3.3 months, P = 0.049). Response or stabilization of disease during second-line chemotherapy predicted for a significantly longer PFS and OS (7.4 versus 3.5, P = 0.005; 15.5 versus 7, P = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Second-line MVAC chemotherapy may result in prolonged survival in some patients with refractory disease. Further research in this field is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":19572,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Urology","volume":"2 ","pages":"193-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin cisplatin combination in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced urothelial cancer: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Karadimou, Evangelos Lianos, Dimitrios Pectasides, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Aristotle Bamias\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAJU.S13122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Second-line treatment options in advanced urothelial cancer are limited. We investigated the efficacy of a methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC) combination after failure of gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty-five patients with advanced urothelial cancer, who received second-line MVAC after first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin (n = 9) or gemcitabine/carboplatin (n = 16), were included in this retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients (88%) relapsed within 6 months after first-line treatment. Following MVAC, there were 5 (20%) objective responses. Median follow-up was 20.2 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.3-5.2), and median overall survival (OS) was 9 months (95% CI: 6.6-11.4). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0.1 versus 2 was associated with longer PFS (5 months versus 3.3 months, P = 0.049). Response or stabilization of disease during second-line chemotherapy predicted for a significantly longer PFS and OS (7.4 versus 3.5, P = 0.005; 15.5 versus 7, P = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Second-line MVAC chemotherapy may result in prolonged survival in some patients with refractory disease. Further research in this field is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"193-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJU.S13122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2010/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJU.S13122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:晚期尿路上皮癌的二线治疗选择有限。我们研究了甲氨蝶呤/长春花碱/阿霉素/顺铂(MVAC)联合治疗吉西他滨/铂化疗失败后的疗效。患者和方法:回顾性分析25例晚期尿路上皮癌患者,在一线吉西他滨/顺铂(n = 9)或吉西他滨/卡铂(n = 16)后接受二线MVAC治疗。结果:22例患者(88%)在一线治疗后6个月内复发。MVAC术后有5例(20%)客观反应。中位随访时间为20.2个月。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为3.8个月(95% CI: 2.3-5.2),中位总生存期(OS)为9个月(95% CI: 6.6-11.4)。东部肿瘤合作组表现状态0.1比2与更长的PFS相关(5个月比3.3个月,P = 0.049)。二线化疗期间疾病的缓解或稳定预示着更长的PFS和OS (7.4 vs 3.5, P = 0.005;15.5 vs . 7, P = 0.046)。结论:二线MVAC化疗可延长部分难治性疾病患者的生存期。这一领域的进一步研究是必要的。
Efficacy of methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin cisplatin combination in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced urothelial cancer: a retrospective analysis.
Objective: Second-line treatment options in advanced urothelial cancer are limited. We investigated the efficacy of a methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC) combination after failure of gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy.
Patients and methods: Twenty-five patients with advanced urothelial cancer, who received second-line MVAC after first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin (n = 9) or gemcitabine/carboplatin (n = 16), were included in this retrospective analysis.
Results: Twenty-two patients (88%) relapsed within 6 months after first-line treatment. Following MVAC, there were 5 (20%) objective responses. Median follow-up was 20.2 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.3-5.2), and median overall survival (OS) was 9 months (95% CI: 6.6-11.4). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0.1 versus 2 was associated with longer PFS (5 months versus 3.3 months, P = 0.049). Response or stabilization of disease during second-line chemotherapy predicted for a significantly longer PFS and OS (7.4 versus 3.5, P = 0.005; 15.5 versus 7, P = 0.046).
Conclusions: Second-line MVAC chemotherapy may result in prolonged survival in some patients with refractory disease. Further research in this field is necessary.