一年级医学生的情感和认知共情。

ISRN Psychiatry Pub Date : 2013-10-21 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/801530
Sandra Dehning, Sarah Gasperi, Daniela Krause, Sebastian Meyer, Eva Reiß, Max Burger, Fabian Jacobs, Anna Buchheim, Norbert Müller, Matthias Siebeck
{"title":"一年级医学生的情感和认知共情。","authors":"Sandra Dehning,&nbsp;Sarah Gasperi,&nbsp;Daniela Krause,&nbsp;Sebastian Meyer,&nbsp;Eva Reiß,&nbsp;Max Burger,&nbsp;Fabian Jacobs,&nbsp;Anna Buchheim,&nbsp;Norbert Müller,&nbsp;Matthias Siebeck","doi":"10.1155/2013/801530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives. Doctors' empathy towards their patients is considered important for treatment outcome. However, during medical school there might be a decline in empathy called \"hardening of the heart.\" This study evaluated the cognitive and emotional empathy in medical students and investigated the influence of a preference for a specialty and students attachment styles. Methods. 126 first-year medical students were included and completed the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test revised version (RME-R), the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES), and the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised Adult Attachment Questionnaire (ECR-R). Results. Students identified 22 ± 4.30 of 36 photographs in the RME-R test correctly (norm: 26). The female students' mean BEES total score was 51.1 ± 17.1 and the male students' 27.2 ± 22.6; P < 0.0001. The female students' mean BEES score was significantly (P = 0.0037) below the female norm of 60. Students who preferred a specialty with continuity of patient care scored significantly higher in the BEES (P = 0.014). A more avoidant attachment style was associated with a lower BEES score (P = 0.021). Conclusion. The students showed low emotional and cognitive empathy scores and an avoidant attachment style. This supports the inclusion of specific training in cognitive and emotional empathy in medical education. </p>","PeriodicalId":14749,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Psychiatry","volume":"2013 ","pages":"801530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/801530","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional and cognitive empathy in first-year medical students.\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Dehning,&nbsp;Sarah Gasperi,&nbsp;Daniela Krause,&nbsp;Sebastian Meyer,&nbsp;Eva Reiß,&nbsp;Max Burger,&nbsp;Fabian Jacobs,&nbsp;Anna Buchheim,&nbsp;Norbert Müller,&nbsp;Matthias Siebeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/801530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives. Doctors' empathy towards their patients is considered important for treatment outcome. However, during medical school there might be a decline in empathy called \\\"hardening of the heart.\\\" This study evaluated the cognitive and emotional empathy in medical students and investigated the influence of a preference for a specialty and students attachment styles. Methods. 126 first-year medical students were included and completed the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test revised version (RME-R), the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES), and the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised Adult Attachment Questionnaire (ECR-R). Results. Students identified 22 ± 4.30 of 36 photographs in the RME-R test correctly (norm: 26). The female students' mean BEES total score was 51.1 ± 17.1 and the male students' 27.2 ± 22.6; P < 0.0001. The female students' mean BEES score was significantly (P = 0.0037) below the female norm of 60. Students who preferred a specialty with continuity of patient care scored significantly higher in the BEES (P = 0.014). A more avoidant attachment style was associated with a lower BEES score (P = 0.021). Conclusion. The students showed low emotional and cognitive empathy scores and an avoidant attachment style. This supports the inclusion of specific training in cognitive and emotional empathy in medical education. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"801530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/801530\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/801530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/801530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

目标。医生对病人的同理心被认为对治疗结果很重要。然而,在医学院期间,同情心可能会下降,这被称为“心变硬”。本研究评估了医学生的认知共情和情感共情,并探讨了专业偏好和依恋类型对医学生共情的影响。方法:对126名医科大一学生进行问卷调查,分别填写《眼读心术测试》(RME-R)、《平衡情感共情量表》(BEES)和《亲密关系体验-成人依恋问卷》(ECR-R)。结果。在RME-R测试中,学生正确识别了36张照片中的22±4.30张(规范:26)。女生平均蜜蜂总分为51.1±17.1分,男生平均蜜蜂总分为27.2±22.6分;P < 0.0001。女学生的平均蜜蜂得分显著(P = 0.0037)低于60分的女性常模。选择具有连续性患者护理专业的学生在BEES中的得分显著较高(P = 0.014)。回避型依恋类型越强,蜜蜂得分越低(P = 0.021)。结论。学生表现出较低的情感和认知共情得分和回避型依恋类型。这支持在医学教育中纳入具体的认知和情感共情培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emotional and cognitive empathy in first-year medical students.

Objectives. Doctors' empathy towards their patients is considered important for treatment outcome. However, during medical school there might be a decline in empathy called "hardening of the heart." This study evaluated the cognitive and emotional empathy in medical students and investigated the influence of a preference for a specialty and students attachment styles. Methods. 126 first-year medical students were included and completed the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test revised version (RME-R), the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES), and the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised Adult Attachment Questionnaire (ECR-R). Results. Students identified 22 ± 4.30 of 36 photographs in the RME-R test correctly (norm: 26). The female students' mean BEES total score was 51.1 ± 17.1 and the male students' 27.2 ± 22.6; P < 0.0001. The female students' mean BEES score was significantly (P = 0.0037) below the female norm of 60. Students who preferred a specialty with continuity of patient care scored significantly higher in the BEES (P = 0.014). A more avoidant attachment style was associated with a lower BEES score (P = 0.021). Conclusion. The students showed low emotional and cognitive empathy scores and an avoidant attachment style. This supports the inclusion of specific training in cognitive and emotional empathy in medical education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empathy in undergraduate medical students of bangladesh: psychometric analysis and differences by gender, academic year, and specialty preferences. Ziprasidone as adjunctive therapy in severe bipolar patients treated with clozapine. Clinical practice guidelines in psychiatry: more confusion than clarity? A critical review and recommendation of a unified guideline. The psychogeriatric patient in the emergency room: focus on management and disposition. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 negative modulation in phase I clinical trial: potential impact of circadian rhythm on the neuropsychiatric adverse reactions-do hallucinations matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1