同居时间与短暂家庭生活。

IF 1.4 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1080/01494929.2013.803008
Andrew Golub, Megan Reid, Jennifer Strickler, Eloise Dunlap
{"title":"同居时间与短暂家庭生活。","authors":"Andrew Golub,&nbsp;Megan Reid,&nbsp;Jennifer Strickler,&nbsp;Eloise Dunlap","doi":"10.1080/01494929.2013.803008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research finds that many impoverished urban Black adults engage in a pattern of partnering and family formation involving a succession of short cohabitations yielding children, a paradigm referred to as transient domesticity. Researchers have identified socioeconomic status, cultural adaptations, and urbanicity as explanations for aspects of this pattern. We used longitudinal data from the 2001 Survey of Income and Program Participation to analyze variation in cohabitation and marriage duration by race/ethnicity, income, and urban residence. Proportional hazards regression indicated that separation risk is greater among couples that are cohabiting, below 200% of the federal poverty line, and Black but is not greater among urban dwellers. This provides empirical demographic evidence to support the emerging theory of transient domesticity and suggests that both socioeconomic status and race explain this pattern. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding transient domesticity and make recommendations for using the Survey of Income and Program Participation to further study this family formation paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":51527,"journal":{"name":"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01494929.2013.803008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cohabitation Duration and Transient Domesticity.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Golub,&nbsp;Megan Reid,&nbsp;Jennifer Strickler,&nbsp;Eloise Dunlap\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01494929.2013.803008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research finds that many impoverished urban Black adults engage in a pattern of partnering and family formation involving a succession of short cohabitations yielding children, a paradigm referred to as transient domesticity. Researchers have identified socioeconomic status, cultural adaptations, and urbanicity as explanations for aspects of this pattern. We used longitudinal data from the 2001 Survey of Income and Program Participation to analyze variation in cohabitation and marriage duration by race/ethnicity, income, and urban residence. Proportional hazards regression indicated that separation risk is greater among couples that are cohabiting, below 200% of the federal poverty line, and Black but is not greater among urban dwellers. This provides empirical demographic evidence to support the emerging theory of transient domesticity and suggests that both socioeconomic status and race explain this pattern. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding transient domesticity and make recommendations for using the Survey of Income and Program Participation to further study this family formation paradigm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01494929.2013.803008\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2013.803008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2013.803008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

研究发现,许多贫困的城市黑人成年人从事一种伴侣和家庭组成的模式,其中包括一系列的短期同居,产生孩子,这种模式被称为临时家庭生活。研究人员已经确定社会经济地位、文化适应和城市化可以解释这种模式的各个方面。我们使用2001年收入和项目参与调查的纵向数据来分析不同种族/民族、收入和城市居住地的同居和婚姻持续时间的变化。比例风险回归表明,在联邦贫困线的200%以下的同居夫妇中,分离风险更大,而黑人和城市居民的分离风险并不大。这为支持新兴的短暂家庭生活理论提供了经验统计学证据,并表明社会经济地位和种族都可以解释这种模式。我们讨论了这些发现对理解短暂家庭生活的意义,并建议使用收入和计划参与调查来进一步研究这种家庭形成范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cohabitation Duration and Transient Domesticity.

Research finds that many impoverished urban Black adults engage in a pattern of partnering and family formation involving a succession of short cohabitations yielding children, a paradigm referred to as transient domesticity. Researchers have identified socioeconomic status, cultural adaptations, and urbanicity as explanations for aspects of this pattern. We used longitudinal data from the 2001 Survey of Income and Program Participation to analyze variation in cohabitation and marriage duration by race/ethnicity, income, and urban residence. Proportional hazards regression indicated that separation risk is greater among couples that are cohabiting, below 200% of the federal poverty line, and Black but is not greater among urban dwellers. This provides empirical demographic evidence to support the emerging theory of transient domesticity and suggests that both socioeconomic status and race explain this pattern. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding transient domesticity and make recommendations for using the Survey of Income and Program Participation to further study this family formation paradigm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Marriage & Family Review publishes a mix of open submission articles as well as thematic issues that bring together the most current research, practice, advances in theory development, and applications of knowledge on a particular topic in the field. Marriage & Family Review has historically welcomed open submissions from numerous international scholars and will continue to do so. The journal will continue to welcome manuscripts that concern family strengths and premarital relationship development. Another continued emphasis will be research-based manuscripts concerning controversial issues.
期刊最新文献
Ethnic Differences in the Effects of Five Disciplinary Techniques on Subsequent Externalizing Behavior Problems. "Best-Laid Plans": Barriers to Meeting Marital Timing Desires Over the Life Course. Rethinking and Revising Goode's Contribution to Global Family Change. Role of Marital Quality in Explaining Depressive Symptoms After Marital Termination Among Older Adults. Marriage Advantage in Subjective Well-Being: Causal Effect or Unmeasured Heterogeneity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1