早发性和晚发性阿尔茨海默病的差异。

American journal of neurodegenerative disease Pub Date : 2013-11-29 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01
Peter K Panegyres, Huei-Yang Chen
{"title":"早发性和晚发性阿尔茨海默病的差异。","authors":"Peter K Panegyres,&nbsp;Huei-Yang Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies comparing early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset AD (LOAD) have been limited by cross-sectional design and a focus on isolated clinical variables. This study aims to explore differentials in clinical features between EOAD and LOAD and to examine longitudinally trends in cognitive function. Data from 3,747 subjects with AD from C-Path Online Data Repository was used to compare demographics, body mass index (BMI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), biochemistry and cognitive assessments, including mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), between EOAD and LOAD. The baseline differences were examined by binominal proportion test and t-test. The trends of cognitive functions, evaluating by MMSE and ADAS-Cog, were examined by the mixed model, controlling for the effect of repeated measures of the same person. No significant difference was found in BMI and MAP. C-reactive protein, creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (p<0.05) were significantly higher in LOAD. The APOE ε4 alleles was more likely to be found among LOAD compared to APOE ε2 or APOE ε3. EOAD had significantly lower MMSE at baseline and this difference significantly increased over time. Despite an insignificant differential in ADAS-Cog between EOAD and LOAD at baseline, the differential was enlarged gradually and became more significant with time. Our findings suggest that elevated inflammatory markers, impaired renal function and APOE ε4 alleles are overrepresented in LOAD, possibly indicating that different factors determine the development of EOAD and its more rapid cognitive deterioration. </p>","PeriodicalId":72170,"journal":{"name":"American journal of neurodegenerative disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852569/pdf/ajnd0002-0300.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences between early and late onset Alzheimer's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Peter K Panegyres,&nbsp;Huei-Yang Chen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous studies comparing early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset AD (LOAD) have been limited by cross-sectional design and a focus on isolated clinical variables. This study aims to explore differentials in clinical features between EOAD and LOAD and to examine longitudinally trends in cognitive function. Data from 3,747 subjects with AD from C-Path Online Data Repository was used to compare demographics, body mass index (BMI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), biochemistry and cognitive assessments, including mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), between EOAD and LOAD. The baseline differences were examined by binominal proportion test and t-test. The trends of cognitive functions, evaluating by MMSE and ADAS-Cog, were examined by the mixed model, controlling for the effect of repeated measures of the same person. No significant difference was found in BMI and MAP. C-reactive protein, creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (p<0.05) were significantly higher in LOAD. The APOE ε4 alleles was more likely to be found among LOAD compared to APOE ε2 or APOE ε3. EOAD had significantly lower MMSE at baseline and this difference significantly increased over time. Despite an insignificant differential in ADAS-Cog between EOAD and LOAD at baseline, the differential was enlarged gradually and became more significant with time. Our findings suggest that elevated inflammatory markers, impaired renal function and APOE ε4 alleles are overrepresented in LOAD, possibly indicating that different factors determine the development of EOAD and its more rapid cognitive deterioration. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of neurodegenerative disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852569/pdf/ajnd0002-0300.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of neurodegenerative disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of neurodegenerative disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前比较早发性阿尔茨海默病(EOAD)和晚发性阿尔茨海默病(LOAD)的研究受到横断面设计和孤立临床变量的限制。本研究旨在探讨EOAD和LOAD之间的临床特征差异,并研究认知功能的纵向趋势。来自C-Path在线数据存储库的3747名AD患者的数据用于比较EOAD和LOAD之间的人口统计学、体重指数(BMI)、平均动脉压(MAP)、生物化学和认知评估,包括迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知亚量表(ADAS-Cog)。采用二项比例检验和t检验检验基线差异。采用MMSE和ADAS-Cog评价认知功能的趋势,采用混合模型检验,控制同一人重复测量的影响。BMI和MAP无显著差异。c -反应蛋白、肌酐和血尿素氮(BUN) (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences between early and late onset Alzheimer's disease.

Previous studies comparing early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late-onset AD (LOAD) have been limited by cross-sectional design and a focus on isolated clinical variables. This study aims to explore differentials in clinical features between EOAD and LOAD and to examine longitudinally trends in cognitive function. Data from 3,747 subjects with AD from C-Path Online Data Repository was used to compare demographics, body mass index (BMI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), biochemistry and cognitive assessments, including mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), between EOAD and LOAD. The baseline differences were examined by binominal proportion test and t-test. The trends of cognitive functions, evaluating by MMSE and ADAS-Cog, were examined by the mixed model, controlling for the effect of repeated measures of the same person. No significant difference was found in BMI and MAP. C-reactive protein, creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (p<0.05) were significantly higher in LOAD. The APOE ε4 alleles was more likely to be found among LOAD compared to APOE ε2 or APOE ε3. EOAD had significantly lower MMSE at baseline and this difference significantly increased over time. Despite an insignificant differential in ADAS-Cog between EOAD and LOAD at baseline, the differential was enlarged gradually and became more significant with time. Our findings suggest that elevated inflammatory markers, impaired renal function and APOE ε4 alleles are overrepresented in LOAD, possibly indicating that different factors determine the development of EOAD and its more rapid cognitive deterioration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exceptionally giant neglected sacral chordoma in a post-poliotic residual paralysis patient - a rare case scenario. Evaluation of willingness to obtain of Covid 19 vaccine in patients with multiple sclerosis. Short segment posterior fixation of unstable thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with fractured vertebra augmentation with intermediate pedicle screw - a clinicoradiological analysis. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis and Alzheimer's disease: a bibliometric analysis. Leveraging genetic diversity to understand monogenic Parkinson's disease's landscape in AfrAbia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1