在CONDOR试验中,塞来昔布和双氯芬酸加奥美拉唑在治疗高GI风险关节炎患者中同样有效。

Q4 Medicine Open Rheumatology Journal Pub Date : 2013-11-13 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874312901307010096
Herbert L Kellner, Chunming Li, Margaret N Essex
{"title":"在CONDOR试验中,塞来昔布和双氯芬酸加奥美拉唑在治疗高GI风险关节炎患者中同样有效。","authors":"Herbert L Kellner,&nbsp;Chunming Li,&nbsp;Margaret N Essex","doi":"10.2174/1874312901307010096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare effectiveness of celecoxib versus diclofenac plus omeprazole in improving arthritis signs and symptoms in patients at high gastrointestinal (GI) risk who were enrolled in the CONDOR (Celecoxib vs Omeprazole and Diclofenac in Patients With Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis) trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CONDOR was a 6-month, prospective, double-blind, triple-dummy, parallel-group, randomized, multicenter trial comparing celecoxib 200 mg twice daily versus diclofenac slow release (SR) 75 mg twice daily plus omeprazole 20 mg daily. Patients were Helicobacter pylori negative, had osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), were aged ≥60 years, were with or without a history of gastroduodenal ulceration, or were ≥18 years with previous gastroduodenal ulceration. Patients' Global Assessment of Arthritis was determined at each study visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4484 patients were randomized to treatment (2238 celecoxib, 2246 diclofenac SR) and included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Least squares mean (LSM) (standard error [SE]) for Patients' Global Assessment of Arthritis was 3.219 (0.017) and 3.221 (0.017) at baseline for celecoxib and diclofenac SR (p=0.90). Improvement in both groups was similar in months 2, 4, and 6; at month 1 the LSM (SE) was 2.647 (0.017) and 2.586 (0.017) for celecoxib and diclofenac (p=0.0025). LSM difference (SE) from baseline to final visit demonstrated an improvement of 0.75 (0.02) in celecoxib-treated patients and 0.77 (0.02) in diclofenac SR-treated patients (p=0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Celecoxib and diclofenac plus omeprazole were shown to have similar efficacy in patients with OA and/or RA at increased GI risk who were enrolled in the CONDOR trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registry: </strong>Trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00141102.</p>","PeriodicalId":39124,"journal":{"name":"Open Rheumatology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874312901307010096","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Celecoxib and Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole are Similarly Effective in the Treatment of Arthritis in Patients at High GI Risk in the CONDOR Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Herbert L Kellner,&nbsp;Chunming Li,&nbsp;Margaret N Essex\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874312901307010096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare effectiveness of celecoxib versus diclofenac plus omeprazole in improving arthritis signs and symptoms in patients at high gastrointestinal (GI) risk who were enrolled in the CONDOR (Celecoxib vs Omeprazole and Diclofenac in Patients With Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis) trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CONDOR was a 6-month, prospective, double-blind, triple-dummy, parallel-group, randomized, multicenter trial comparing celecoxib 200 mg twice daily versus diclofenac slow release (SR) 75 mg twice daily plus omeprazole 20 mg daily. Patients were Helicobacter pylori negative, had osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), were aged ≥60 years, were with or without a history of gastroduodenal ulceration, or were ≥18 years with previous gastroduodenal ulceration. Patients' Global Assessment of Arthritis was determined at each study visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4484 patients were randomized to treatment (2238 celecoxib, 2246 diclofenac SR) and included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Least squares mean (LSM) (standard error [SE]) for Patients' Global Assessment of Arthritis was 3.219 (0.017) and 3.221 (0.017) at baseline for celecoxib and diclofenac SR (p=0.90). Improvement in both groups was similar in months 2, 4, and 6; at month 1 the LSM (SE) was 2.647 (0.017) and 2.586 (0.017) for celecoxib and diclofenac (p=0.0025). LSM difference (SE) from baseline to final visit demonstrated an improvement of 0.75 (0.02) in celecoxib-treated patients and 0.77 (0.02) in diclofenac SR-treated patients (p=0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Celecoxib and diclofenac plus omeprazole were shown to have similar efficacy in patients with OA and/or RA at increased GI risk who were enrolled in the CONDOR trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registry: </strong>Trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00141102.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Rheumatology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874312901307010096\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Rheumatology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874312901307010096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Rheumatology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874312901307010096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:比较塞来昔布与双氯芬酸加奥美拉唑在CONDOR(塞来昔布与奥美拉唑加双氯芬酸治疗骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者)试验中改善高胃肠道(GI)风险患者关节炎体征和症状的有效性。方法:CONDOR是一项为期6个月的前瞻性、双盲、三假、平行组、随机、多中心试验,比较塞来昔布200 mg每日2次与双氯芬酸缓释(SR) 75 mg每日2次与奥美拉唑20 mg每日2次。患者幽门螺杆菌阴性,患有骨关节炎(OA)或类风湿关节炎(RA),年龄≥60岁,有无胃十二指肠溃疡史,或既往胃十二指肠溃疡≥18岁。在每次研究访问时确定患者对关节炎的总体评估。结果:共有4484例患者被随机分配到治疗组(2238例塞来昔布,2246例双氯芬酸SR),并被纳入意向治疗分析。塞来昔布和双氯芬酸SR患者总体关节炎评估的最小二乘平均(LSM)(标准误差[SE])基线值为3.219(0.017)和3.221 (0.017)(p=0.90)。两组患者在第2、4、6个月的改善情况相似;第1个月时,塞来昔布和双氯芬酸的LSM (SE)分别为2.647(0.017)和2.586 (0.017)(p=0.0025)。从基线到最后一次就诊的LSM差异(SE)表明,塞来昔布治疗的患者改善了0.75(0.02),双氯芬酸sr治疗的患者改善了0.77 (0.02)(p=0.42)。结论:在CONDOR试验中,塞来昔布和双氯芬酸加奥美拉唑对胃肠道风险增加的OA和/或RA患者具有相似的疗效。试验注册:试验注册编号为ClinicalTrials.gov,编号为NCT00141102。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Celecoxib and Diclofenac Plus Omeprazole are Similarly Effective in the Treatment of Arthritis in Patients at High GI Risk in the CONDOR Trial.

Objective: Compare effectiveness of celecoxib versus diclofenac plus omeprazole in improving arthritis signs and symptoms in patients at high gastrointestinal (GI) risk who were enrolled in the CONDOR (Celecoxib vs Omeprazole and Diclofenac in Patients With Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis) trial.

Methods: CONDOR was a 6-month, prospective, double-blind, triple-dummy, parallel-group, randomized, multicenter trial comparing celecoxib 200 mg twice daily versus diclofenac slow release (SR) 75 mg twice daily plus omeprazole 20 mg daily. Patients were Helicobacter pylori negative, had osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), were aged ≥60 years, were with or without a history of gastroduodenal ulceration, or were ≥18 years with previous gastroduodenal ulceration. Patients' Global Assessment of Arthritis was determined at each study visit.

Results: A total of 4484 patients were randomized to treatment (2238 celecoxib, 2246 diclofenac SR) and included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Least squares mean (LSM) (standard error [SE]) for Patients' Global Assessment of Arthritis was 3.219 (0.017) and 3.221 (0.017) at baseline for celecoxib and diclofenac SR (p=0.90). Improvement in both groups was similar in months 2, 4, and 6; at month 1 the LSM (SE) was 2.647 (0.017) and 2.586 (0.017) for celecoxib and diclofenac (p=0.0025). LSM difference (SE) from baseline to final visit demonstrated an improvement of 0.75 (0.02) in celecoxib-treated patients and 0.77 (0.02) in diclofenac SR-treated patients (p=0.42).

Conclusions: Celecoxib and diclofenac plus omeprazole were shown to have similar efficacy in patients with OA and/or RA at increased GI risk who were enrolled in the CONDOR trial.

Trial registry: Trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00141102.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Rheumatology Journal
Open Rheumatology Journal Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: ENTHAM Open publishes a number of peer-reviewed, open access journals. These free-to-view online journals cover all major disciplines of science, medicine, technology and social sciences. BENTHAM Open provides researchers a platform to rapidly publish their research in a good-quality peer-reviewed journal. All peer-reviewed accepted submissions meeting high research and ethical standards are published with free access to all.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Features, Socio-cultural Characteristics, Sleep Patterns, and Depression in Fibromyalgia Patients from India: A Cross-Sectional Study The Diagnostic Significance of Serum Sclerostin in Early Detection of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Syrian Patients Clinical Characteristics of Systemic Sclerosis-associated Myopathy Patients Comparing Different Subgroups of Inflammatory Myopathies Association of Interleukin-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Gene Polymorphisms with Gnetic Susceptibility of Psoriatic Arthritis in Kuwaiti Arab Patients The Etiopathogenesis and Genetic Factors in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: A Review Article
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1