真的吗?欧盟日期标记和易腐食品的估价

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102381
Alessio D’Amato , Timo Goeschl , Luisa Lorè , Mariangela Zoli
{"title":"真的吗?欧盟日期标记和易腐食品的估价","authors":"Alessio D’Amato ,&nbsp;Timo Goeschl ,&nbsp;Luisa Lorè ,&nbsp;Mariangela Zoli","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Date marking is intended to help consumers make informed food safety and quality choices when confronted with perishable food products. We provide causal in-store evidence on how EU-style date marking (best before and use by) influences consumers’ valuation of perishable food around the expiry date. In a preparatory survey (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>100</mn></mrow></math></span>), we first identify perishable food items amenable to experimental manipulation. A modified multiple price list (MPL) experiment (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>200</mn></mrow></math></span>) then tests shoppers’ valuation of perishable food with expiry dates in the future and the past. We vary date mark type (use-by versus best-before) and information status (with and without education) while preventing free disposal censoring. We find that expiry dates affect consumer valuation. Variation in date mark type has little practical relevance. Educating consumers about the meaning of date mark types reduces willingness to pay for potentially unsafe food, but does not increase it for more durable items. An attentiveness experiment (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>160</mn></mrow></math></span>) finds that inattention and consumers’ native understanding of current date marks can explain the evidence from the modified MPL experiment. Jointly, these results help explaining existing observational evidence and assessing the prospects of consumer education campaigns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102381"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"True to type? EU-style date marking and the valuation of perishable food\",\"authors\":\"Alessio D’Amato ,&nbsp;Timo Goeschl ,&nbsp;Luisa Lorè ,&nbsp;Mariangela Zoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Date marking is intended to help consumers make informed food safety and quality choices when confronted with perishable food products. We provide causal in-store evidence on how EU-style date marking (best before and use by) influences consumers’ valuation of perishable food around the expiry date. In a preparatory survey (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>100</mn></mrow></math></span>), we first identify perishable food items amenable to experimental manipulation. A modified multiple price list (MPL) experiment (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>200</mn></mrow></math></span>) then tests shoppers’ valuation of perishable food with expiry dates in the future and the past. We vary date mark type (use-by versus best-before) and information status (with and without education) while preventing free disposal censoring. We find that expiry dates affect consumer valuation. Variation in date mark type has little practical relevance. Educating consumers about the meaning of date mark types reduces willingness to pay for potentially unsafe food, but does not increase it for more durable items. An attentiveness experiment (<span><math><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>160</mn></mrow></math></span>) finds that inattention and consumers’ native understanding of current date marks can explain the evidence from the modified MPL experiment. Jointly, these results help explaining existing observational evidence and assessing the prospects of consumer education campaigns.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919222001506\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919222001506","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

日期标记旨在帮助消费者在面对易腐食品时做出明智的食品安全和质量选择。我们提供了关于欧盟风格的日期标记(最佳食用日期和食用日期)如何影响消费者对过期食品的评估的因果证据。在一项预备调查(n=100)中,我们首先确定了易腐烂的食品项目,可以进行实验操作。一项修正多重价目表(MPL)实验(n=200)随后测试了购物者对未来和过去有效期的易腐食品的估价。我们改变日期标记类型(使用期限和最佳使用期限)和信息状态(有和没有教育),同时防止自由处置审查。我们发现到期日影响消费者的估值。日期标记类型的变化几乎没有实际意义。让消费者了解日期标志类型的含义,会降低他们购买可能不安全食品的意愿,但不会增加他们购买更耐用食品的意愿。一项注意力实验(n=160)发现,注意力不集中和消费者对当前日期标记的原生理解可以解释修正MPL实验的证据。总之,这些结果有助于解释现有的观察证据和评估消费者教育活动的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
True to type? EU-style date marking and the valuation of perishable food

Date marking is intended to help consumers make informed food safety and quality choices when confronted with perishable food products. We provide causal in-store evidence on how EU-style date marking (best before and use by) influences consumers’ valuation of perishable food around the expiry date. In a preparatory survey (n=100), we first identify perishable food items amenable to experimental manipulation. A modified multiple price list (MPL) experiment (n=200) then tests shoppers’ valuation of perishable food with expiry dates in the future and the past. We vary date mark type (use-by versus best-before) and information status (with and without education) while preventing free disposal censoring. We find that expiry dates affect consumer valuation. Variation in date mark type has little practical relevance. Educating consumers about the meaning of date mark types reduces willingness to pay for potentially unsafe food, but does not increase it for more durable items. An attentiveness experiment (n=160) finds that inattention and consumers’ native understanding of current date marks can explain the evidence from the modified MPL experiment. Jointly, these results help explaining existing observational evidence and assessing the prospects of consumer education campaigns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Viewpoint: Toward a sustainable Green Revolution in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of maize and rice Expanding the phytosanitary exclusion zone for Mexican avocados: Market impacts and unintended consequences Small wins in practice: Learnings from 16 European initiatives working towards the transformation of urban food systems Information interventions and willingness to pay for PICS bags: Evidence from Sierra Leone Do moral constraints and government interventions promote the willingness and behaviors of food saving among urban residents in China? An empirical study based on structural equation model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1