探讨危重气管切开术患者的生活质量:一项初步研究。

Vinciya Pandian, Sonali Bose, Christina Miller, Adam Schiavi, David Feller-Kopman, Nasir Bhatti, Marek Mirski
{"title":"探讨危重气管切开术患者的生活质量:一项初步研究。","authors":"Vinciya Pandian,&nbsp;Sonali Bose,&nbsp;Christina Miller,&nbsp;Adam Schiavi,&nbsp;David Feller-Kopman,&nbsp;Nasir Bhatti,&nbsp;Marek Mirski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tracheostomies are performed to improve health-related quality of life (QOL) in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. As the lengths of stay in intensive care units (ICU) increase and higher rates of tracheostomies are becoming more prevalent, issues regarding patient perceptions of their own prognoses and outcomes after tracheostomy can considerably impact QOL and in turn their care and recovery. Whether tracheostomy improves QOL, however, has not been studied adequately. Current studies investigating QOL have been limited to pre- and post-ICU admission, have relied on surrogate measures such as clinical outcomes and proxy reports, and have used inadequate instruments, failing to capture all domains of QOL. Studies using a robust instrument to investigate QOL in the ICU before and after tracheostomy are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the feasibility of assessing patient-reported QOL of mechanically ventilated ICU patients with a tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective longitudinal pilot study was conducted in awake and interactive patients who were mechanically ventilated in an ICU using a modified version of the University of Washington QOL Questionnaire. Data were collected at three measurement time points--Time 0 (T0), Time 1 (T1), and Time 2 (T2)--five days apart. The QOL scores were compared between patients who received a tracheostomy and those who did not, as well as between those who received a tracheostomy before and after ten days of intubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified University of Washington Quality of Life (UWQOL) questionnaire was easily administered by one person. Patients were able to answer all the questions by writing or pointing at the answer choices with either an endotracheal or a tracheostomy tube in place. The mean time to complete the questionnaire was 7.5 minutes. QOL scores ranging from 0 to 800 were administered. Pain and speech were the most important domains contributing to QOL. The median QOL scores were 242 at T0 and T1, and 383 at T2. There was a significant difference in the median QOL scores between those who received a tracheostomy (458) and those who remained endotracheally intubated (175) at T2. Similarly, patients who received early tracheostomy reached a higher QOL score by T1 compared to those who did not (417 vs. 267).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study demonstrates that a modified questionnaire to assess QOL in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation is feasible, and useful in capturing artificial airway-related QOL. Further studies should evaluate the utility of this tool in a larger study.</p>","PeriodicalId":79417,"journal":{"name":"ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring quality of life in critically ill tracheostomy patients: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Vinciya Pandian,&nbsp;Sonali Bose,&nbsp;Christina Miller,&nbsp;Adam Schiavi,&nbsp;David Feller-Kopman,&nbsp;Nasir Bhatti,&nbsp;Marek Mirski\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tracheostomies are performed to improve health-related quality of life (QOL) in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. As the lengths of stay in intensive care units (ICU) increase and higher rates of tracheostomies are becoming more prevalent, issues regarding patient perceptions of their own prognoses and outcomes after tracheostomy can considerably impact QOL and in turn their care and recovery. Whether tracheostomy improves QOL, however, has not been studied adequately. Current studies investigating QOL have been limited to pre- and post-ICU admission, have relied on surrogate measures such as clinical outcomes and proxy reports, and have used inadequate instruments, failing to capture all domains of QOL. Studies using a robust instrument to investigate QOL in the ICU before and after tracheostomy are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the feasibility of assessing patient-reported QOL of mechanically ventilated ICU patients with a tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective longitudinal pilot study was conducted in awake and interactive patients who were mechanically ventilated in an ICU using a modified version of the University of Washington QOL Questionnaire. Data were collected at three measurement time points--Time 0 (T0), Time 1 (T1), and Time 2 (T2)--five days apart. The QOL scores were compared between patients who received a tracheostomy and those who did not, as well as between those who received a tracheostomy before and after ten days of intubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified University of Washington Quality of Life (UWQOL) questionnaire was easily administered by one person. Patients were able to answer all the questions by writing or pointing at the answer choices with either an endotracheal or a tracheostomy tube in place. The mean time to complete the questionnaire was 7.5 minutes. QOL scores ranging from 0 to 800 were administered. Pain and speech were the most important domains contributing to QOL. The median QOL scores were 242 at T0 and T1, and 383 at T2. There was a significant difference in the median QOL scores between those who received a tracheostomy (458) and those who remained endotracheally intubated (175) at T2. Similarly, patients who received early tracheostomy reached a higher QOL score by T1 compared to those who did not (417 vs. 267).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study demonstrates that a modified questionnaire to assess QOL in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation is feasible, and useful in capturing artificial airway-related QOL. Further studies should evaluate the utility of this tool in a larger study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:气管造口术可以改善需要长时间机械通气的患者的健康相关生活质量(QOL)。随着重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间的增加和气管切开术的发生率越来越高,患者对气管切开术后自己的预后和结果的认知问题会极大地影响患者的生活质量,进而影响他们的护理和康复。然而,气管切开术是否能改善患者的生活质量尚未得到充分的研究。目前调查生活质量的研究仅限于icu入院前和住院后,依赖于替代指标,如临床结果和替代报告,并且使用了不充分的工具,未能捕获生活质量的所有领域。目前尚缺乏使用可靠仪器来评估气管切开术前后ICU患者生活质量的研究。目的:探讨评估ICU机械通气气管切开术患者自报生活质量的可行性。方法:采用改良版的华盛顿大学生活质量问卷,对ICU机械通气的清醒和互动患者进行前瞻性纵向研究。在时间0 (T0)、时间1 (T1)和时间2 (T2)三个测量时间点收集数据,间隔5天。比较了接受气管切开术和未接受气管切开术的患者的生活质量评分,以及气管切开术前后10天插管的患者的生活质量评分。结果:修改后的华盛顿大学生活质量(UWQOL)问卷易于一人填写。患者可以在气管内或气管造口管置入的情况下,通过书写或指向答案选项来回答所有问题。完成问卷的平均时间为7.5分钟。生活质量评分从0到800分不等。疼痛和言语是影响生活质量的最重要领域。T0和T1时中位生活质量评分为242,T2时为383。在T2时,接受气管切开术(458)和气管插管(175)的患者中位生活质量评分有显著差异。同样,与未接受气管切开术的患者相比,早期接受气管切开术的患者在T1时获得了更高的生活质量评分(417比267)。结论:本初步研究表明,改进的问卷评估延长机械通气患者的生活质量是可行的,并且有助于捕获人工气道相关的生活质量。进一步的研究应该在更大的研究中评估该工具的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring quality of life in critically ill tracheostomy patients: a pilot study.

Background: Tracheostomies are performed to improve health-related quality of life (QOL) in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. As the lengths of stay in intensive care units (ICU) increase and higher rates of tracheostomies are becoming more prevalent, issues regarding patient perceptions of their own prognoses and outcomes after tracheostomy can considerably impact QOL and in turn their care and recovery. Whether tracheostomy improves QOL, however, has not been studied adequately. Current studies investigating QOL have been limited to pre- and post-ICU admission, have relied on surrogate measures such as clinical outcomes and proxy reports, and have used inadequate instruments, failing to capture all domains of QOL. Studies using a robust instrument to investigate QOL in the ICU before and after tracheostomy are lacking.

Purpose: To explore the feasibility of assessing patient-reported QOL of mechanically ventilated ICU patients with a tracheostomy.

Methods: A prospective longitudinal pilot study was conducted in awake and interactive patients who were mechanically ventilated in an ICU using a modified version of the University of Washington QOL Questionnaire. Data were collected at three measurement time points--Time 0 (T0), Time 1 (T1), and Time 2 (T2)--five days apart. The QOL scores were compared between patients who received a tracheostomy and those who did not, as well as between those who received a tracheostomy before and after ten days of intubation.

Results: The modified University of Washington Quality of Life (UWQOL) questionnaire was easily administered by one person. Patients were able to answer all the questions by writing or pointing at the answer choices with either an endotracheal or a tracheostomy tube in place. The mean time to complete the questionnaire was 7.5 minutes. QOL scores ranging from 0 to 800 were administered. Pain and speech were the most important domains contributing to QOL. The median QOL scores were 242 at T0 and T1, and 383 at T2. There was a significant difference in the median QOL scores between those who received a tracheostomy (458) and those who remained endotracheally intubated (175) at T2. Similarly, patients who received early tracheostomy reached a higher QOL score by T1 compared to those who did not (417 vs. 267).

Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that a modified questionnaire to assess QOL in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation is feasible, and useful in capturing artificial airway-related QOL. Further studies should evaluate the utility of this tool in a larger study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-extubation Assessment of Laryngeal Symptoms and Severity (PALSS) in the Intensive Care Unit: Protocol of a Prospective Cohort Study. Unlocking Silent Suffering: Addressing the Otorhinolaryngologic Needs of Incarcerated Persons Through Carceral Health Education. Membership in Professional Nursing Organizations. Otolaryngology Nurses' Awareness of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Early Detection and Aggressive Management of Otologic Pathologies in Children with Down Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1