冷漠中奖励和努力机制的特征

Valerie Bonnelle , Kai-Riin Veromann , Stephanie Burnett Heyes , Elena Lo Sterzo , Sanjay Manohar , Masud Husain
{"title":"冷漠中奖励和努力机制的特征","authors":"Valerie Bonnelle ,&nbsp;Kai-Riin Veromann ,&nbsp;Stephanie Burnett Heyes ,&nbsp;Elena Lo Sterzo ,&nbsp;Sanjay Manohar ,&nbsp;Masud Husain","doi":"10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Apathy is a common but poorly understood condition with a wide societal impact observed in several brain disorders as well as, to some extent, in the normal population. Hence the need for better characterization of the underlying mechanisms. The processes by which individuals decide to attribute physical effort to obtain rewards might be particularly relevant to relate to apathy traits. Here, we designed two paradigms to assess individual differences in physical effort production and effort-based decision-making and their relation to apathy in healthy people. Apathy scores were measured using a modified version of the Lille Apathy Rating Scale, suitable for use in a non-clinical population.</p><p>In the first study, apathy scores were correlated with the degree to which stake (reward on offer) and difficulty level impacts on physical effort production. Individuals with relatively high apathy traits showed an increased modulation of effort while more motivated individuals generally exerted greater force across different levels of stake. To clarify the underlying mechanisms for this behavior, we designed a second task that allows independent titration of stake and effort levels for which subjects are willing to engage in an effortful response to obtain a reward. Our results suggest that apathy traits in the normal population are related to the way reward <em>subjectively</em> affects the estimation of effort costs, and more particularly manifest as decreased willingness to exert effort when rewards are small, or below threshold. The tasks we introduce here may provide useful tools to further investigate apathy in clinical populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-Paris","volume":"109 1","pages":"Pages 16-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.04.002","citationCount":"88","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of reward and effort mechanisms in apathy\",\"authors\":\"Valerie Bonnelle ,&nbsp;Kai-Riin Veromann ,&nbsp;Stephanie Burnett Heyes ,&nbsp;Elena Lo Sterzo ,&nbsp;Sanjay Manohar ,&nbsp;Masud Husain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Apathy is a common but poorly understood condition with a wide societal impact observed in several brain disorders as well as, to some extent, in the normal population. Hence the need for better characterization of the underlying mechanisms. The processes by which individuals decide to attribute physical effort to obtain rewards might be particularly relevant to relate to apathy traits. Here, we designed two paradigms to assess individual differences in physical effort production and effort-based decision-making and their relation to apathy in healthy people. Apathy scores were measured using a modified version of the Lille Apathy Rating Scale, suitable for use in a non-clinical population.</p><p>In the first study, apathy scores were correlated with the degree to which stake (reward on offer) and difficulty level impacts on physical effort production. Individuals with relatively high apathy traits showed an increased modulation of effort while more motivated individuals generally exerted greater force across different levels of stake. To clarify the underlying mechanisms for this behavior, we designed a second task that allows independent titration of stake and effort levels for which subjects are willing to engage in an effortful response to obtain a reward. Our results suggest that apathy traits in the normal population are related to the way reward <em>subjectively</em> affects the estimation of effort costs, and more particularly manifest as decreased willingness to exert effort when rewards are small, or below threshold. The tasks we introduce here may provide useful tools to further investigate apathy in clinical populations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-Paris\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.04.002\",\"citationCount\":\"88\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-Paris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928425714000138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-Paris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928425714000138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

摘要

冷漠是一种常见但知之甚少的状况,在几种脑部疾病中以及在某种程度上在正常人群中都有广泛的社会影响。因此,需要更好地描述潜在机制。个体决定将体力劳动归因于获得奖励的过程可能与冷漠特征特别相关。在此,我们设计了两个范式来评估健康人体力劳动产生和基于努力的决策的个体差异及其与冷漠的关系。冷漠评分采用改良版的里尔冷漠评分量表进行测量,该量表适用于非临床人群。在第一项研究中,冷漠得分与赌注(提供的奖励)和难度水平对体力劳动产生的影响程度相关。具有相对高冷漠特征的个体表现出更多的努力调节,而更积极的个体通常在不同的利害关系水平上施加更大的力量。为了澄清这种行为的潜在机制,我们设计了第二个任务,允许独立滴定利害关系和努力水平,受试者愿意参与努力反应以获得奖励。我们的研究结果表明,正常人群中的冷漠特征与奖励主观影响努力成本的方式有关,特别是当奖励很小或低于阈值时,表现为付出努力的意愿降低。我们在这里介绍的任务可能为进一步研究临床人群的冷漠提供有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterization of reward and effort mechanisms in apathy

Apathy is a common but poorly understood condition with a wide societal impact observed in several brain disorders as well as, to some extent, in the normal population. Hence the need for better characterization of the underlying mechanisms. The processes by which individuals decide to attribute physical effort to obtain rewards might be particularly relevant to relate to apathy traits. Here, we designed two paradigms to assess individual differences in physical effort production and effort-based decision-making and their relation to apathy in healthy people. Apathy scores were measured using a modified version of the Lille Apathy Rating Scale, suitable for use in a non-clinical population.

In the first study, apathy scores were correlated with the degree to which stake (reward on offer) and difficulty level impacts on physical effort production. Individuals with relatively high apathy traits showed an increased modulation of effort while more motivated individuals generally exerted greater force across different levels of stake. To clarify the underlying mechanisms for this behavior, we designed a second task that allows independent titration of stake and effort levels for which subjects are willing to engage in an effortful response to obtain a reward. Our results suggest that apathy traits in the normal population are related to the way reward subjectively affects the estimation of effort costs, and more particularly manifest as decreased willingness to exert effort when rewards are small, or below threshold. The tasks we introduce here may provide useful tools to further investigate apathy in clinical populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-Paris
Journal of Physiology-Paris 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.02
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each issue of the Journal of Physiology (Paris) is specially commissioned, and provides an overview of one important area of neuroscience, delivering review and research papers from leading researchers in that field. The content will interest both those specializing in the experimental study of the brain and those working in interdisciplinary fields linking theory and biological data, including cellular neuroscience, mathematical analysis of brain function, computational neuroscience, biophysics of brain imaging and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Automated detection of high-frequency oscillations in electrophysiological signals: Methodological advances Digital hardware implementation of a stochastic two-dimensional neuron model Recent progress in multi-electrode spike sorting methods Retrospectively supervised click decoder calibration for self-calibrating point-and-click brain–computer interfaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1