{"title":"合并症影响缺血性心脏病患者健康的多个方面。","authors":"Shervin Assari, Maryam Moghani Lankarani, Khodabakhsh Ahmadi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comorbidity is prevalent among patients with Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) and may influence patients' subjective and objective domains of well-being.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate the associations between comorbidity and different measures of well-being (i.e. health related quality of life, psychological distress, sleep quality, and dyadic adjustment) among patients with IHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 796 outpatients with documented IHD were enrolled from an outpatient cardiology clinic in 2006. Comorbidity (Ifudu index), quality of life (SF36), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; HADS), sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index; PSQI), and dyadic adjustment quality (Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale; RDAS) were measured. Associations between comorbidity and different measures of well-being were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant correlations were found between comorbidity score and all measures of well-being. Comorbidity score was correlated with physical quality of life (r = -0.471, P < 0.001), mental quality of life (r = -0.447, P < 0.001), psychological distress (r = 0.344, P < 0.001), sleep quality (r = 0.358, P < 0.001), and dyadic adjustment (r = -0.201, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed a consistent pattern of associations between somatic comorbidities and multiple aspects of well-being among patients with IHD. Findings may increase cardiologists' interest to identify and treat somatic conditions among IHD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":43653,"journal":{"name":"International Cardiovascular Research Journal","volume":"7 4","pages":"118-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comorbidity influences multiple aspects of well-being of patients with ischemic heart disease.\",\"authors\":\"Shervin Assari, Maryam Moghani Lankarani, Khodabakhsh Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comorbidity is prevalent among patients with Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) and may influence patients' subjective and objective domains of well-being.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate the associations between comorbidity and different measures of well-being (i.e. health related quality of life, psychological distress, sleep quality, and dyadic adjustment) among patients with IHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 796 outpatients with documented IHD were enrolled from an outpatient cardiology clinic in 2006. Comorbidity (Ifudu index), quality of life (SF36), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; HADS), sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index; PSQI), and dyadic adjustment quality (Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale; RDAS) were measured. Associations between comorbidity and different measures of well-being were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant correlations were found between comorbidity score and all measures of well-being. Comorbidity score was correlated with physical quality of life (r = -0.471, P < 0.001), mental quality of life (r = -0.447, P < 0.001), psychological distress (r = 0.344, P < 0.001), sleep quality (r = 0.358, P < 0.001), and dyadic adjustment (r = -0.201, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed a consistent pattern of associations between somatic comorbidities and multiple aspects of well-being among patients with IHD. Findings may increase cardiologists' interest to identify and treat somatic conditions among IHD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Cardiovascular Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"118-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987444/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Cardiovascular Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Cardiovascular Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:共病在缺血性心脏病(IHD)患者中普遍存在,并可能影响患者的主观和客观幸福感。目的:我们的目的是调查IHD患者的共病与不同的幸福指标(即健康相关的生活质量、心理困扰、睡眠质量和双元调整)之间的关系。方法:在这项横断面研究中,2006年从一家门诊心脏病诊所登记了796名有IHD记录的门诊患者。共病(Ifudu指数)、生活质量(SF36)、心理困扰(医院焦虑抑郁量表);HADS)、睡眠质量(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数;PSQI)和并进调整质量(修订并进调整量表;RDAS)。确定了合并症与不同幸福感指标之间的关系。结果:共病评分与所有幸福感指标之间存在显著相关性。合并症评分与身体生活质量(r = -0.471, P < 0.001)、精神生活质量(r = -0.447, P < 0.001)、心理困扰(r = 0.344, P < 0.001)、睡眠质量(r = 0.358, P < 0.001)、二元调节(r = -0.201, P < 0.001)相关。结论:本研究显示了IHD患者躯体合并症与健康的多个方面之间一致的关联模式。研究结果可能会增加心脏病学家对识别和治疗IHD患者躯体疾病的兴趣。
Comorbidity influences multiple aspects of well-being of patients with ischemic heart disease.
Background: Comorbidity is prevalent among patients with Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) and may influence patients' subjective and objective domains of well-being.
Objectives: We aimed to investigate the associations between comorbidity and different measures of well-being (i.e. health related quality of life, psychological distress, sleep quality, and dyadic adjustment) among patients with IHD.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 796 outpatients with documented IHD were enrolled from an outpatient cardiology clinic in 2006. Comorbidity (Ifudu index), quality of life (SF36), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; HADS), sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index; PSQI), and dyadic adjustment quality (Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale; RDAS) were measured. Associations between comorbidity and different measures of well-being were determined.
Results: Significant correlations were found between comorbidity score and all measures of well-being. Comorbidity score was correlated with physical quality of life (r = -0.471, P < 0.001), mental quality of life (r = -0.447, P < 0.001), psychological distress (r = 0.344, P < 0.001), sleep quality (r = 0.358, P < 0.001), and dyadic adjustment (r = -0.201, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: This study showed a consistent pattern of associations between somatic comorbidities and multiple aspects of well-being among patients with IHD. Findings may increase cardiologists' interest to identify and treat somatic conditions among IHD patients.