中国良好的疼痛管理(GPM)病房项目及其对中国癌症患者的影响:SYSUCC的经验。

Q Medicine 癌症 Pub Date : 2014-07-01 Epub Date: 2014-05-26 DOI:10.5732/cjc.014.10031
Yun-Peng Yang, Yu-Xiang Ma, Yan Huang, Yuan-Yuan Zhao, Fei Xu, Ying Tian, Ben-Yan Zou, Rui-Zhen Gao, Li Zhang
{"title":"中国良好的疼痛管理(GPM)病房项目及其对中国癌症患者的影响:SYSUCC的经验。","authors":"Yun-Peng Yang,&nbsp;Yu-Xiang Ma,&nbsp;Yan Huang,&nbsp;Yuan-Yuan Zhao,&nbsp;Fei Xu,&nbsp;Ying Tian,&nbsp;Ben-Yan Zou,&nbsp;Rui-Zhen Gao,&nbsp;Li Zhang","doi":"10.5732/cjc.014.10031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To improve cancer pain management, the Medical Oncology Department of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) launched the Good Pain Management (GPM) Ward Program, which has been recognized by the Chinese Ministry of Health and promoted throughout the nation. This retrospective case-control study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. Patients diagnosed with malignant solid tumors with bone metastasis were eligible. Patients who were admitted 6 months before the initiation of the GPM program were used as the control group, and patients admitted 6 months after the initiation of the program were used as the GPM group. The pain-reporting rate and pain management index (PMI) were calculated. The pain levels before and after pain management were compared. A total of 475 patients (244 in the control group and 231 in the GPM group) were analyzed. The pain-reporting rate of the GPM group was significantly higher than that of the control group (62.8% vs. 37.7%, P < 0.001). The PMI of the GPM group was significantly higher than that of the control group (0.083 vs. -0.261, P < 0.001). Therefore, the GPM Ward Program improved the pain management of cancer patients and provided experience for improving cancer pain management in the future. </p>","PeriodicalId":10034,"journal":{"name":"癌症","volume":"33 7","pages":"323-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/c5/cjc-33-07-323.PMC4110464.pdf","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The good pain management (GPM) ward program in China and its impact on Chinese cancer patients: the SYSUCC experience.\",\"authors\":\"Yun-Peng Yang,&nbsp;Yu-Xiang Ma,&nbsp;Yan Huang,&nbsp;Yuan-Yuan Zhao,&nbsp;Fei Xu,&nbsp;Ying Tian,&nbsp;Ben-Yan Zou,&nbsp;Rui-Zhen Gao,&nbsp;Li Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.5732/cjc.014.10031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To improve cancer pain management, the Medical Oncology Department of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) launched the Good Pain Management (GPM) Ward Program, which has been recognized by the Chinese Ministry of Health and promoted throughout the nation. This retrospective case-control study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. Patients diagnosed with malignant solid tumors with bone metastasis were eligible. Patients who were admitted 6 months before the initiation of the GPM program were used as the control group, and patients admitted 6 months after the initiation of the program were used as the GPM group. The pain-reporting rate and pain management index (PMI) were calculated. The pain levels before and after pain management were compared. A total of 475 patients (244 in the control group and 231 in the GPM group) were analyzed. The pain-reporting rate of the GPM group was significantly higher than that of the control group (62.8% vs. 37.7%, P < 0.001). The PMI of the GPM group was significantly higher than that of the control group (0.083 vs. -0.261, P < 0.001). Therefore, the GPM Ward Program improved the pain management of cancer patients and provided experience for improving cancer pain management in the future. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"癌症\",\"volume\":\"33 7\",\"pages\":\"323-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/c5/cjc-33-07-323.PMC4110464.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"癌症\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.014.10031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"癌症","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.014.10031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

为了改善癌症疼痛管理,中山大学肿瘤中心肿瘤内科推出了良好疼痛管理(GPM)病房项目,该项目得到了中国卫生部的认可,并在全国推广。本回顾性病例对照研究旨在评估该方案的有效性。诊断为恶性实体瘤并骨转移的患者符合条件。GPM计划开始前6个月入院的患者作为对照组,计划开始后6个月入院的患者作为GPM组。计算疼痛报告率和疼痛管理指数(PMI)。比较疼痛处理前后的疼痛程度。共分析475例患者(对照组244例,GPM组231例)。GPM组疼痛报告率明显高于对照组(62.8% vs. 37.7%, P < 0.001)。GPM组PMI显著高于对照组(0.083 vs. -0.261, P < 0.001)。因此,GPM病房项目改善了癌症患者的疼痛管理,为今后改善癌症疼痛管理提供了经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The good pain management (GPM) ward program in China and its impact on Chinese cancer patients: the SYSUCC experience.

To improve cancer pain management, the Medical Oncology Department of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) launched the Good Pain Management (GPM) Ward Program, which has been recognized by the Chinese Ministry of Health and promoted throughout the nation. This retrospective case-control study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. Patients diagnosed with malignant solid tumors with bone metastasis were eligible. Patients who were admitted 6 months before the initiation of the GPM program were used as the control group, and patients admitted 6 months after the initiation of the program were used as the GPM group. The pain-reporting rate and pain management index (PMI) were calculated. The pain levels before and after pain management were compared. A total of 475 patients (244 in the control group and 231 in the GPM group) were analyzed. The pain-reporting rate of the GPM group was significantly higher than that of the control group (62.8% vs. 37.7%, P < 0.001). The PMI of the GPM group was significantly higher than that of the control group (0.083 vs. -0.261, P < 0.001). Therefore, the GPM Ward Program improved the pain management of cancer patients and provided experience for improving cancer pain management in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
癌症
癌症 ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.47
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9010
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: In July 2008, Landes Bioscience and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center began co-publishing the international, English-language version of AI ZHENG or the Chinese Journal of Cancer (CJC). CJC publishes original research, reviews, extra views, perspectives, supplements, and spotlights in all areas of cancer research. The primary criteria for publication in CJC are originality, outstanding scientific merit, and general interest. The Editorial Board is composed of members from around the world, who will strive to maintain the highest standards for excellence in order to generate a valuable resource for an international readership.
期刊最新文献
New strategies for CAR-T cell in the treatment of solid tumors Effect of myeloid-derived suppressor cells on B cell function in mice bearing breast cancer The relationship of microsatellite instability with infiltration of T lymphocytes in tissues of non-small cell lung cancer Influence of VEGF-C/VEGFR3 signaling pathway on dendritic cells derived from peripheral blood of tumor patients MCP-1/CCR2 axis promotes the homing of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells to lung cancer tissues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1