医学与心身二元论:对梅塔批判的回答。

Callie Joubert
{"title":"医学与心身二元论:对梅塔批判的回答。","authors":"Callie Joubert","doi":"10.4103/0973-1229.130318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neeta Mehta recently advanced the thesis that medical practice is facing a crisis today. In her paper \"Mind-body dualism: a critique from a health perspective\" she attributes the crisis to the philosophy of Descartes and set out to understand why this dualism is still alive despite its disavowal from philosophers, health practitioners and lay people. The aim of my reply to her critique is three-fold. First, I draw attention to a more fundamental problem and show that dualism is inescapable-scientifically and commonsensically. I then focus on the self-conscious emotions of shame, guilt and remorse, and argue that the self is not identical with a brain. The third section draws attention to the crisis in psychiatry and stipulates some of the main reasons why this is so. Contrary to Mehta's thesis, the health profession faces a crisis because of physicalism and biological reductionism. </p>","PeriodicalId":89196,"journal":{"name":"Mens sana monographs","volume":"12 1","pages":"104-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0973-1229.130318","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicine and Mind-Body Dualism: A Reply to Mehta's Critique.\",\"authors\":\"Callie Joubert\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/0973-1229.130318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neeta Mehta recently advanced the thesis that medical practice is facing a crisis today. In her paper \\\"Mind-body dualism: a critique from a health perspective\\\" she attributes the crisis to the philosophy of Descartes and set out to understand why this dualism is still alive despite its disavowal from philosophers, health practitioners and lay people. The aim of my reply to her critique is three-fold. First, I draw attention to a more fundamental problem and show that dualism is inescapable-scientifically and commonsensically. I then focus on the self-conscious emotions of shame, guilt and remorse, and argue that the self is not identical with a brain. The third section draws attention to the crisis in psychiatry and stipulates some of the main reasons why this is so. Contrary to Mehta's thesis, the health profession faces a crisis because of physicalism and biological reductionism. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mens sana monographs\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"104-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0973-1229.130318\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mens sana monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.130318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mens sana monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.130318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

尼塔·梅塔(Neeta Mehta)最近提出了一种观点,即今天的医疗实践正面临危机。在她的论文《身心二元论:从健康角度的批判》中,她将这场危机归因于笛卡尔的哲学,并开始理解为什么尽管哲学家、健康从业者和非专业人士对这种二元论持否定态度,但这种二元论仍然存在。我回答她的批评有三个目的。首先,我提请注意一个更基本的问题,并表明二元论是不可避免的-科学和常识。然后,我将重点放在羞耻、内疚和悔恨等自我意识情绪上,并认为自我与大脑并不相同。第三部分提请注意精神病学的危机,并规定了造成这种情况的一些主要原因。与梅塔的论点相反,由于物理主义和生物还原论,卫生专业面临危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medicine and Mind-Body Dualism: A Reply to Mehta's Critique.

Neeta Mehta recently advanced the thesis that medical practice is facing a crisis today. In her paper "Mind-body dualism: a critique from a health perspective" she attributes the crisis to the philosophy of Descartes and set out to understand why this dualism is still alive despite its disavowal from philosophers, health practitioners and lay people. The aim of my reply to her critique is three-fold. First, I draw attention to a more fundamental problem and show that dualism is inescapable-scientifically and commonsensically. I then focus on the self-conscious emotions of shame, guilt and remorse, and argue that the self is not identical with a brain. The third section draws attention to the crisis in psychiatry and stipulates some of the main reasons why this is so. Contrary to Mehta's thesis, the health profession faces a crisis because of physicalism and biological reductionism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Taking Care of Time Readers Respond Dedication Field of Psychiatry: Current Trends and Future Directions: An Indian Perspective. What Music Means To Me
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1