Only在语境内外对比中的作用。

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Discourse Processes Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167
Katy Carlson
{"title":"Only在语境内外对比中的作用。","authors":"Katy Carlson","doi":"10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three self-paced reading experiments explored the processing of \"only\" and its interaction with context. In isolated sentences, the focus particle \"only\" predicts an upcoming contrast. Ambiguous replacive sentences (e.g., \"The curator embarrassed the gallery owner in public, not the artist\") with \"only\" on the subject or object showed faster reading of the contrast phrase (\"not the artist\") than without it. The position of \"only\" also influenced the phrase's meaning; despite a bias toward object contrasts, subject \"only\" increased subject interpretations. If preceding context provides another reason for the focus particle, it no longer predicts an upcoming contrast. In biasing contexts including indirect questions, there was no facilitation when \"only\" marked the argument which answered the question, while \"only\" on the other argument slowed processing. Both \"only\" and context influenced interpretation. The results show that focus particles and questions can each influence processing of an upcoming contrast on- and off-line.</p>","PeriodicalId":11316,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Processes","volume":"50 4","pages":"249-275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of <i>Only</i> in Contrasts in and out of Context.\",\"authors\":\"Katy Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three self-paced reading experiments explored the processing of \\\"only\\\" and its interaction with context. In isolated sentences, the focus particle \\\"only\\\" predicts an upcoming contrast. Ambiguous replacive sentences (e.g., \\\"The curator embarrassed the gallery owner in public, not the artist\\\") with \\\"only\\\" on the subject or object showed faster reading of the contrast phrase (\\\"not the artist\\\") than without it. The position of \\\"only\\\" also influenced the phrase's meaning; despite a bias toward object contrasts, subject \\\"only\\\" increased subject interpretations. If preceding context provides another reason for the focus particle, it no longer predicts an upcoming contrast. In biasing contexts including indirect questions, there was no facilitation when \\\"only\\\" marked the argument which answered the question, while \\\"only\\\" on the other argument slowed processing. Both \\\"only\\\" and context influenced interpretation. The results show that focus particles and questions can each influence processing of an upcoming contrast on- and off-line.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse Processes\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"249-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Processes","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

三个自定节奏阅读实验探讨了“only”的加工及其与语境的相互作用。在孤立的句子中,焦点词“only”预示着即将到来的对比。用主题或对象上的“only”代替模棱两可的句子(例如,“策展人在公共场合使画廊老板难堪,而不是艺术家”),比不加“only”的对比短语(“not The artist”)的阅读速度更快。“only”的位置也影响了这个短语的意思;尽管偏向于客体对比,但主体“只”增加了主体的解释。如果前面的上下文为焦点粒子提供了另一个原因,它就不再预测即将到来的对比。在有偏见的语境中,包括间接问题,当“only”标记回答问题的论点时,没有促进作用,而“only”标记另一个论点时,则会减慢处理速度。“only”和语境都会影响解释。结果表明,焦点粒子和问题都可以影响即将到来的对比处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of Only in Contrasts in and out of Context.

Three self-paced reading experiments explored the processing of "only" and its interaction with context. In isolated sentences, the focus particle "only" predicts an upcoming contrast. Ambiguous replacive sentences (e.g., "The curator embarrassed the gallery owner in public, not the artist") with "only" on the subject or object showed faster reading of the contrast phrase ("not the artist") than without it. The position of "only" also influenced the phrase's meaning; despite a bias toward object contrasts, subject "only" increased subject interpretations. If preceding context provides another reason for the focus particle, it no longer predicts an upcoming contrast. In biasing contexts including indirect questions, there was no facilitation when "only" marked the argument which answered the question, while "only" on the other argument slowed processing. Both "only" and context influenced interpretation. The results show that focus particles and questions can each influence processing of an upcoming contrast on- and off-line.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Discourse Processes is a multidisciplinary journal providing a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas from diverse disciplines sharing a common interest in discourse--prose comprehension and recall, dialogue analysis, text grammar construction, computer simulation of natural language, cross-cultural comparisons of communicative competence, or related topics. The problems posed by multisentence contexts and the methods required to investigate them, although not always unique to discourse, are sufficiently distinct so as to require an organized mode of scientific interaction made possible through the journal.
期刊最新文献
The costs of multimodal metaphors: comparing ERPs to figurative expressions in verbal and verbo-pictorial formats Vocabulary size and exposure to print predict mastery of connectives in teenage years Comprehending irony in text: evidence from scanpaths Eye-tracking evidence from attachment structures favors a serial model of discourse–sentence interactivity Pinning down the interaction between animacy and syntactic function in the interpretation of German and Italian personal and demonstrative pronouns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1