不同伯氨喹治疗间日疟原虫的疗效观察。

Q2 Medicine Malaria Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-09-10 DOI:10.1155/2014/347018
D D Rajgor, N J Gogtay, V S Kadam, M M Kocharekar, M S Parulekar, S S Dalvi, A B Vaidya, N A Kshirsagar
{"title":"不同伯氨喹治疗间日疟原虫的疗效观察。","authors":"D D Rajgor,&nbsp;N J Gogtay,&nbsp;V S Kadam,&nbsp;M M Kocharekar,&nbsp;M S Parulekar,&nbsp;S S Dalvi,&nbsp;A B Vaidya,&nbsp;N A Kshirsagar","doi":"10.1155/2014/347018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Efficacy of standard dose of primaquine (PQ) as antirelapse for P. vivax has decreased. We aimed to assess efficacy of different PQ regimens. Methods. It was an open label, randomized, controlled, parallel group, assessor blind study comparing antirelapse efficacy of 3 PQ regimens (B = 15 mg/day × 14 days, C = 30 mg/day × 7 days, and D = 30 mg/day × 14 days) with no PQ group (A) in P. vivax patients. Paired primary and recurrence samples were subjected to 3 methods: (i) month of recurrence and genotyping, (ii) by PCR-RFLP, and (iii) PCR sequencing, to differentiate relapse and reinfection. The rates of recurrence relapse and reinfection were compared. Methods were compared for concordance between them. Results. The recurrence rate was 16.39%, 8.07%, 10.07%, and 6.62% in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (P = 0.004). The relapse rate was 6.89%, 1.55%, 4%, and 3.85% as per the month of recurrence; 8.2%, 2%, 4.58%, and 3.68% (P = 0.007) as per PCR-RFLP; and 2.73%, 1.47%, 1.55%, and 1.53% as per PCR sequencing for groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. The concordance between methods was low, 45%. Conclusion. The higher recurrence rate in no PQ as compared to PQ groups documents PQ antirelapse activity. Regimens tested were safe. However, probable resistance to PQ warrants continuous monitoring and low concordance and limitations in the methods warrant caution in interpreting. </p>","PeriodicalId":18089,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/347018","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antirelapse Efficacy of Various Primaquine Regimens for Plasmodium vivax.\",\"authors\":\"D D Rajgor,&nbsp;N J Gogtay,&nbsp;V S Kadam,&nbsp;M M Kocharekar,&nbsp;M S Parulekar,&nbsp;S S Dalvi,&nbsp;A B Vaidya,&nbsp;N A Kshirsagar\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/347018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background. Efficacy of standard dose of primaquine (PQ) as antirelapse for P. vivax has decreased. We aimed to assess efficacy of different PQ regimens. Methods. It was an open label, randomized, controlled, parallel group, assessor blind study comparing antirelapse efficacy of 3 PQ regimens (B = 15 mg/day × 14 days, C = 30 mg/day × 7 days, and D = 30 mg/day × 14 days) with no PQ group (A) in P. vivax patients. Paired primary and recurrence samples were subjected to 3 methods: (i) month of recurrence and genotyping, (ii) by PCR-RFLP, and (iii) PCR sequencing, to differentiate relapse and reinfection. The rates of recurrence relapse and reinfection were compared. Methods were compared for concordance between them. Results. The recurrence rate was 16.39%, 8.07%, 10.07%, and 6.62% in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (P = 0.004). The relapse rate was 6.89%, 1.55%, 4%, and 3.85% as per the month of recurrence; 8.2%, 2%, 4.58%, and 3.68% (P = 0.007) as per PCR-RFLP; and 2.73%, 1.47%, 1.55%, and 1.53% as per PCR sequencing for groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. The concordance between methods was low, 45%. Conclusion. The higher recurrence rate in no PQ as compared to PQ groups documents PQ antirelapse activity. Regimens tested were safe. However, probable resistance to PQ warrants continuous monitoring and low concordance and limitations in the methods warrant caution in interpreting. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaria Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/347018\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaria Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/347018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/9/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/347018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

背景。标准剂量的伯氨喹(PQ)抗间日疟原虫复发的疗效有所下降。我们的目的是评估不同PQ方案的疗效。方法。这是一项开放标签、随机对照、平行组、评估盲研究,比较3种PQ治疗方案(B = 15 mg/天× 14天,C = 30 mg/天× 7天,D = 30 mg/天× 14天)与无PQ治疗组(A)在间日疟患者中的抗复发效果。配对的原发和复发样本采用3种方法:(i)复发月份和基因分型,(ii) PCR- rflp, (iii) PCR测序,以区分复发和再感染。比较两组的复发率、复发率和再感染率。方法间的一致性比较。结果。A、B、C、D组复发率分别为16.39%、8.07%、10.07%、6.62% (P = 0.004)。复发率按复发月份分别为6.89%、1.55%、4%、3.85%;PCR-RFLP分别为8.2%、2%、4.58%和3.68% (P = 0.007);A、B、C、D组PCR测序结果分别为2.73%、1.47%、1.55%、1.53%。方法间的一致性较低,为45%。结论。与PQ组相比,无PQ组的复发率较高,证明了PQ的抗复发活性。经过测试的治疗方案是安全的。然而,对PQ的可能抗性需要持续监测,低一致性和方法的局限性需要谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antirelapse Efficacy of Various Primaquine Regimens for Plasmodium vivax.

Background. Efficacy of standard dose of primaquine (PQ) as antirelapse for P. vivax has decreased. We aimed to assess efficacy of different PQ regimens. Methods. It was an open label, randomized, controlled, parallel group, assessor blind study comparing antirelapse efficacy of 3 PQ regimens (B = 15 mg/day × 14 days, C = 30 mg/day × 7 days, and D = 30 mg/day × 14 days) with no PQ group (A) in P. vivax patients. Paired primary and recurrence samples were subjected to 3 methods: (i) month of recurrence and genotyping, (ii) by PCR-RFLP, and (iii) PCR sequencing, to differentiate relapse and reinfection. The rates of recurrence relapse and reinfection were compared. Methods were compared for concordance between them. Results. The recurrence rate was 16.39%, 8.07%, 10.07%, and 6.62% in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (P = 0.004). The relapse rate was 6.89%, 1.55%, 4%, and 3.85% as per the month of recurrence; 8.2%, 2%, 4.58%, and 3.68% (P = 0.007) as per PCR-RFLP; and 2.73%, 1.47%, 1.55%, and 1.53% as per PCR sequencing for groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. The concordance between methods was low, 45%. Conclusion. The higher recurrence rate in no PQ as compared to PQ groups documents PQ antirelapse activity. Regimens tested were safe. However, probable resistance to PQ warrants continuous monitoring and low concordance and limitations in the methods warrant caution in interpreting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaria Research and Treatment
Malaria Research and Treatment Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Malaria Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of malaria.
期刊最新文献
Expression of Concern on “Protective Effect of Quercetin on Chloroquine-Induced Oxidative Stress and Hepatotoxicity in Mice” Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax Prevalence in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Incidence of Malaria Parasites in Screened Donor Blood for Transfusion. Oviposition and Development of Anopheles coluzzii coetzee and Wilkerson in Salt Water Prevalence and Factors Associated with Acute Kidney Injury among Malaria Patients in Dar es Salaam: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1