国际宗教指标:政府管制、政府偏袒与宗教社会管制。

Brian J Grim, Roger Finke
{"title":"国际宗教指标:政府管制、政府偏袒与宗教社会管制。","authors":"Brian J Grim,&nbsp;Roger Finke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study of religion is severely handicapped by a lack of adequate cross-national data. Despite the prominence of religion in international events and recent theoretical models pointing to the consequences of regulating religion, cross-national research on religion has been lacking. We strive to fill this void by developing measurement models and indexes for <i>government regulation, government favoritism,</i> and <i>social regulation</i> of religion. The indexes rely on data from an extensive coding of the <i>2003 International Religious Freedom Report</i> for 196 countries and territories. Using a series of tests to evaluate the new data and indexes, we find that the measures developed are highly reliable and valid. The three indexes will allow researchers and others to measure the government's subsidy and regulation of religion as well as the restrictions placed on religion by social and cultural forces beyond the state.</p>","PeriodicalId":90533,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary journal of research on religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4254791/pdf/nihms590319.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Religion Indexes: Government Regulation, Government Favoritism, and Social Regulation of Religion.\",\"authors\":\"Brian J Grim,&nbsp;Roger Finke\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study of religion is severely handicapped by a lack of adequate cross-national data. Despite the prominence of religion in international events and recent theoretical models pointing to the consequences of regulating religion, cross-national research on religion has been lacking. We strive to fill this void by developing measurement models and indexes for <i>government regulation, government favoritism,</i> and <i>social regulation</i> of religion. The indexes rely on data from an extensive coding of the <i>2003 International Religious Freedom Report</i> for 196 countries and territories. Using a series of tests to evaluate the new data and indexes, we find that the measures developed are highly reliable and valid. The three indexes will allow researchers and others to measure the government's subsidy and regulation of religion as well as the restrictions placed on religion by social and cultural forces beyond the state.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary journal of research on religion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4254791/pdf/nihms590319.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary journal of research on religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary journal of research on religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于缺乏足够的跨国数据,宗教研究受到严重阻碍。尽管宗教在国际事件中占有突出地位,最近的理论模型也指出了规范宗教的后果,但对宗教的跨国研究一直缺乏。我们努力通过建立政府监管、政府偏袒和宗教社会监管的衡量模型和指标来填补这一空白。这些指数的依据是《2003年国际宗教自由报告》中196个国家和地区的广泛编码数据。通过一系列试验对新数据和指标进行了评价,发现所制定的措施具有较高的信度和有效性。这三个指数将使研究人员和其他人能够衡量政府对宗教的补贴和监管,以及国家以外的社会和文化力量对宗教的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International Religion Indexes: Government Regulation, Government Favoritism, and Social Regulation of Religion.

The study of religion is severely handicapped by a lack of adequate cross-national data. Despite the prominence of religion in international events and recent theoretical models pointing to the consequences of regulating religion, cross-national research on religion has been lacking. We strive to fill this void by developing measurement models and indexes for government regulation, government favoritism, and social regulation of religion. The indexes rely on data from an extensive coding of the 2003 International Religious Freedom Report for 196 countries and territories. Using a series of tests to evaluate the new data and indexes, we find that the measures developed are highly reliable and valid. The three indexes will allow researchers and others to measure the government's subsidy and regulation of religion as well as the restrictions placed on religion by social and cultural forces beyond the state.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pluralism as Outcome: The Ecology of Religious Resources, Suppliers, and Consumers. International Religion Indexes: Government Regulation, Government Favoritism, and Social Regulation of Religion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1