全球湿疹试验资源(GREAT数据库)的验证。

Q2 Medicine BMC Dermatology Pub Date : 2015-03-14 DOI:10.1186/s12895-015-0024-z
Helen Nankervis, Alison Devine, Hywel C Williams, John R Ingram, Elizabeth Doney, Finola Delamere, Sherie Smith, Kim S Thomas
{"title":"全球湿疹试验资源(GREAT数据库)的验证。","authors":"Helen Nankervis,&nbsp;Alison Devine,&nbsp;Hywel C Williams,&nbsp;John R Ingram,&nbsp;Elizabeth Doney,&nbsp;Finola Delamere,&nbsp;Sherie Smith,&nbsp;Kim S Thomas","doi":"10.1186/s12895-015-0024-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eczema (syn. Atopic Eczema or Atopic Dermatitis) is a chronic, relapsing, itchy skin condition which probably results from a combination of genetic and environmental factors. The Global Resource of EczemA Trials (GREAT) is a collection of records of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for eczema treatment produced from a highly sensitive search of six reference databases. We sought to assess the sensitivity of the GREAT database as a tool to save future researchers repeating extensive bibliographic searches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All Cochrane systematic review on treatments for eczema and five non-Cochrane systematic reviews on eczema were identified as a reference set to assess the utility of the GREAT database in identifying randomised controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs included in the systematic reviews were checked for inclusion in the GREAT database by two independent authors. A third author resolved any disagreements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five Cochrane and six non-Cochrane systematic reviews containing a total of 105 RCTs of eczema treatments were included. Of these, 95 fitted the inclusion criteria for the GREAT database and 88 were published from 2000 onwards. Of the 88 eligible studies, 92% were found in the GREAT database. Seven trials were not included in the GREAT database - two of these were reported within a review paper and one as an abstract with no trial results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sensitivity of the GREAT database for trials from 2000 onwards was high (75/88 trials, 94%). Sensitivity for the period prior to 2000 was less sensitive, due to differences in how the trials were identified prior to this time. 'Dual' filtering for new records has recently become part of the GREAT database methodology and should further improve the sensitivity of the database in time. The GREAT database can be considered as a primary source for future systematic reviews including randomised controlled trials of eczema treatments, but searches should be supplemented by checking reference lists for eligible trials, searching trial registries and contacting pharmaceutical companies for unpublished studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"15 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-015-0024-z","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the global resource of eczema trials (GREAT database).\",\"authors\":\"Helen Nankervis,&nbsp;Alison Devine,&nbsp;Hywel C Williams,&nbsp;John R Ingram,&nbsp;Elizabeth Doney,&nbsp;Finola Delamere,&nbsp;Sherie Smith,&nbsp;Kim S Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12895-015-0024-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eczema (syn. Atopic Eczema or Atopic Dermatitis) is a chronic, relapsing, itchy skin condition which probably results from a combination of genetic and environmental factors. The Global Resource of EczemA Trials (GREAT) is a collection of records of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for eczema treatment produced from a highly sensitive search of six reference databases. We sought to assess the sensitivity of the GREAT database as a tool to save future researchers repeating extensive bibliographic searches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All Cochrane systematic review on treatments for eczema and five non-Cochrane systematic reviews on eczema were identified as a reference set to assess the utility of the GREAT database in identifying randomised controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs included in the systematic reviews were checked for inclusion in the GREAT database by two independent authors. A third author resolved any disagreements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five Cochrane and six non-Cochrane systematic reviews containing a total of 105 RCTs of eczema treatments were included. Of these, 95 fitted the inclusion criteria for the GREAT database and 88 were published from 2000 onwards. Of the 88 eligible studies, 92% were found in the GREAT database. Seven trials were not included in the GREAT database - two of these were reported within a review paper and one as an abstract with no trial results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sensitivity of the GREAT database for trials from 2000 onwards was high (75/88 trials, 94%). Sensitivity for the period prior to 2000 was less sensitive, due to differences in how the trials were identified prior to this time. 'Dual' filtering for new records has recently become part of the GREAT database methodology and should further improve the sensitivity of the database in time. The GREAT database can be considered as a primary source for future systematic reviews including randomised controlled trials of eczema treatments, but searches should be supplemented by checking reference lists for eligible trials, searching trial registries and contacting pharmaceutical companies for unpublished studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-015-0024-z\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-015-0024-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-015-0024-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:湿疹(又称特应性湿疹或特应性皮炎)是一种慢性、复发性、皮肤发痒的疾病,可能是遗传和环境因素共同作用的结果。全球湿疹试验资源(GREAT)是湿疹治疗的随机对照试验(rct)记录的集合,从六个参考数据库的高度敏感搜索中产生。我们试图评估GREAT数据库作为一种工具的敏感性,以避免未来的研究人员重复大量的书目搜索。方法:所有关于湿疹治疗的Cochrane系统评价和5个关于湿疹的非Cochrane系统评价被确定为参考集,以评估GREAT数据库在识别随机对照试验(rct)方面的效用。纳入系统评价的随机对照试验由两位独立作者检查是否纳入GREAT数据库。第三位作者解决了任何分歧。结果:纳入5篇Cochrane和6篇非Cochrane系统综述,共纳入105项湿疹治疗的随机对照试验。其中95篇符合GREAT数据库的收录标准,88篇从2000年起发表。在88项符合条件的研究中,92%在GREAT数据库中找到。七项试验没有被纳入GREAT数据库——其中两项是在一篇综述论文中报道的,另一项是没有试验结果的摘要。结论:GREAT数据库对2000年以后的试验的敏感性很高(75/88个试验,94%)。2000年之前的敏感性较低,因为在此之前试验的识别方式存在差异。新记录的“双重”过滤最近已成为GREAT数据库方法的一部分,并应进一步提高数据库的灵敏度。GREAT数据库可以被认为是未来系统评价的主要来源,包括湿疹治疗的随机对照试验,但搜索应该通过检查符合条件的试验的参考列表、搜索试验注册和联系制药公司以获取未发表的研究来补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the global resource of eczema trials (GREAT database).

Background: Eczema (syn. Atopic Eczema or Atopic Dermatitis) is a chronic, relapsing, itchy skin condition which probably results from a combination of genetic and environmental factors. The Global Resource of EczemA Trials (GREAT) is a collection of records of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for eczema treatment produced from a highly sensitive search of six reference databases. We sought to assess the sensitivity of the GREAT database as a tool to save future researchers repeating extensive bibliographic searches.

Methods: All Cochrane systematic review on treatments for eczema and five non-Cochrane systematic reviews on eczema were identified as a reference set to assess the utility of the GREAT database in identifying randomised controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs included in the systematic reviews were checked for inclusion in the GREAT database by two independent authors. A third author resolved any disagreements.

Results: Five Cochrane and six non-Cochrane systematic reviews containing a total of 105 RCTs of eczema treatments were included. Of these, 95 fitted the inclusion criteria for the GREAT database and 88 were published from 2000 onwards. Of the 88 eligible studies, 92% were found in the GREAT database. Seven trials were not included in the GREAT database - two of these were reported within a review paper and one as an abstract with no trial results.

Conclusions: The sensitivity of the GREAT database for trials from 2000 onwards was high (75/88 trials, 94%). Sensitivity for the period prior to 2000 was less sensitive, due to differences in how the trials were identified prior to this time. 'Dual' filtering for new records has recently become part of the GREAT database methodology and should further improve the sensitivity of the database in time. The GREAT database can be considered as a primary source for future systematic reviews including randomised controlled trials of eczema treatments, but searches should be supplemented by checking reference lists for eligible trials, searching trial registries and contacting pharmaceutical companies for unpublished studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Dermatology
BMC Dermatology Medicine-Dermatology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Dermatology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of skin disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. BMC Dermatology (ISSN 1471-5945) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, MEDLINE, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Effects of variations in access to care for children with atopic dermatitis. Associations of self-reported atopic dermatitis with comorbid conditions in adults: a population-based cross-sectional study. Quality of life of patients living with psoriasis: a qualitative study. Multidisciplinary educational programme for caregivers of children with atopic dermatitis- in South East Norway - an observational study. Skin manifestations after bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1