学术医疗中心附加实验室检测的影响:一项五年回顾性研究

Q2 Medicine BMC Clinical Pathology Pub Date : 2015-06-07 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12907-015-0011-7
Louis S Nelson, Scott R Davis, Robert M Humble, Jeff Kulhavy, Dean R Aman, Matthew D Krasowski
{"title":"学术医疗中心附加实验室检测的影响:一项五年回顾性研究","authors":"Louis S Nelson,&nbsp;Scott R Davis,&nbsp;Robert M Humble,&nbsp;Jeff Kulhavy,&nbsp;Dean R Aman,&nbsp;Matthew D Krasowski","doi":"10.1186/s12907-015-0011-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical laboratories frequently receive orders to perform additional tests on existing specimens ('add-ons'). Previous studies have examined add-on ordering patterns over short periods of time. The objective of this study was to analyze add-on ordering patterns over an extended time period. We also analyzed the impact of a robotic specimen archival/retrieval system on add-on testing procedure and manual effort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study at an academic medical center, electronic health records from were searched to obtain all add-on orders that were placed in the time period of May 2, 2009 to December 31, 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the time period of retrospective study, 880,359 add-on tests were ordered on 96,244 different patients. Add-on testing comprised 3.3 % of total test volumes. There were 443,411 unique ordering instances, leading to an average of 1.99 add-on tests per instance. Some patients had multiple episodes of add-on test orders at different points in time, leading to an average of 9.15 add-on tests per patient. The majority of add-on orders were for chemistry tests (78.8 % of total add-ons) with the next most frequent being hematology and coagulation tests (11.2 % of total add-ons). Inpatient orders accounted for 66.8 % of total add-on orders, while the emergency department and outpatient clinics had 14.8 % and 18.4 % of total add-on orders, respectively. The majority of add-ons were placed within 8 hours (87.3 %) and nearly all by 24 hours (96.8 %). Nearly 100 % of add-on orders within the emergency department were placed within 8 hours. The introduction of a robotic specimen archival/retrieval unit saved an average of 2.75 minutes of laboratory staff manual time per unique add-on order. This translates to 24.1 hours/day less manual effort in dealing with add-on orders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reflects the previous literature in showing that add-on orders significantly impact the workload of the clinical laboratory. The majority of add-on orders are clinical chemistry tests, and most add-on orders occur within 24 hours of original specimen collection. Robotic specimen archival/retrieval units can reduce manual effort in the clinical laboratory associated with add-on orders.</p>","PeriodicalId":35804,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12907-015-0011-7","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Louis S Nelson,&nbsp;Scott R Davis,&nbsp;Robert M Humble,&nbsp;Jeff Kulhavy,&nbsp;Dean R Aman,&nbsp;Matthew D Krasowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12907-015-0011-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical laboratories frequently receive orders to perform additional tests on existing specimens ('add-ons'). Previous studies have examined add-on ordering patterns over short periods of time. The objective of this study was to analyze add-on ordering patterns over an extended time period. We also analyzed the impact of a robotic specimen archival/retrieval system on add-on testing procedure and manual effort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study at an academic medical center, electronic health records from were searched to obtain all add-on orders that were placed in the time period of May 2, 2009 to December 31, 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the time period of retrospective study, 880,359 add-on tests were ordered on 96,244 different patients. Add-on testing comprised 3.3 % of total test volumes. There were 443,411 unique ordering instances, leading to an average of 1.99 add-on tests per instance. Some patients had multiple episodes of add-on test orders at different points in time, leading to an average of 9.15 add-on tests per patient. The majority of add-on orders were for chemistry tests (78.8 % of total add-ons) with the next most frequent being hematology and coagulation tests (11.2 % of total add-ons). Inpatient orders accounted for 66.8 % of total add-on orders, while the emergency department and outpatient clinics had 14.8 % and 18.4 % of total add-on orders, respectively. The majority of add-ons were placed within 8 hours (87.3 %) and nearly all by 24 hours (96.8 %). Nearly 100 % of add-on orders within the emergency department were placed within 8 hours. The introduction of a robotic specimen archival/retrieval unit saved an average of 2.75 minutes of laboratory staff manual time per unique add-on order. This translates to 24.1 hours/day less manual effort in dealing with add-on orders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reflects the previous literature in showing that add-on orders significantly impact the workload of the clinical laboratory. The majority of add-on orders are clinical chemistry tests, and most add-on orders occur within 24 hours of original specimen collection. Robotic specimen archival/retrieval units can reduce manual effort in the clinical laboratory associated with add-on orders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Clinical Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12907-015-0011-7\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Clinical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-015-0011-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-015-0011-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:临床实验室经常接到对现有标本进行额外检测的命令(“附加”)。之前的研究考察了短时间内的附加排序模式。本研究的目的是分析一段较长时间内的附加组件订购模式。我们还分析了机器人标本存档/检索系统对附加测试程序和人工工作的影响。方法:在一所学术医疗中心进行回顾性研究,检索2009年5月2日至2014年12月31日期间所有附加订单的电子健康记录。结果:在回顾性研究期间,对96,244名不同的患者订购了880,359项附加试验。附加测试占总测试量的3.3%。有443,411个唯一排序实例,导致每个实例平均有1.99个附加测试。一些患者在不同的时间点有多次附加测试命令,导致每位患者平均进行9.15次附加测试。大多数附加项目订单是化学测试(占总附加项目的78.8%),其次是血液学和凝血测试(占总附加项目的11.2%)。住院医嘱占全部附加医嘱的66.8%,急诊科和门诊医嘱分别占全部附加医嘱的14.8%和18.4%。大多数附加组件是在8小时内放置的(87.3%),几乎所有附加组件都是在24小时内放置的(96.8%)。急诊科近100%的附加订单都是在8小时内完成的。机器人标本存档/检索装置的引入为实验室人员平均节省了2.75分钟的人工时间,每个单独的附加订单。这意味着每天处理附加订单的人工工作量减少了24.1小时。结论:我们的研究反映了先前的文献,显示附加订单显著影响临床实验室的工作量。大多数附加订单是临床化学测试,大多数附加订单发生在原始标本采集后24小时内。机器人标本存档/检索单元可以减少临床实验室与附加订单相关的人工工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study.

Background: Clinical laboratories frequently receive orders to perform additional tests on existing specimens ('add-ons'). Previous studies have examined add-on ordering patterns over short periods of time. The objective of this study was to analyze add-on ordering patterns over an extended time period. We also analyzed the impact of a robotic specimen archival/retrieval system on add-on testing procedure and manual effort.

Methods: In this retrospective study at an academic medical center, electronic health records from were searched to obtain all add-on orders that were placed in the time period of May 2, 2009 to December 31, 2014.

Results: During the time period of retrospective study, 880,359 add-on tests were ordered on 96,244 different patients. Add-on testing comprised 3.3 % of total test volumes. There were 443,411 unique ordering instances, leading to an average of 1.99 add-on tests per instance. Some patients had multiple episodes of add-on test orders at different points in time, leading to an average of 9.15 add-on tests per patient. The majority of add-on orders were for chemistry tests (78.8 % of total add-ons) with the next most frequent being hematology and coagulation tests (11.2 % of total add-ons). Inpatient orders accounted for 66.8 % of total add-on orders, while the emergency department and outpatient clinics had 14.8 % and 18.4 % of total add-on orders, respectively. The majority of add-ons were placed within 8 hours (87.3 %) and nearly all by 24 hours (96.8 %). Nearly 100 % of add-on orders within the emergency department were placed within 8 hours. The introduction of a robotic specimen archival/retrieval unit saved an average of 2.75 minutes of laboratory staff manual time per unique add-on order. This translates to 24.1 hours/day less manual effort in dealing with add-on orders.

Conclusion: Our study reflects the previous literature in showing that add-on orders significantly impact the workload of the clinical laboratory. The majority of add-on orders are clinical chemistry tests, and most add-on orders occur within 24 hours of original specimen collection. Robotic specimen archival/retrieval units can reduce manual effort in the clinical laboratory associated with add-on orders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Clinical Pathology
BMC Clinical Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Clinical Pathology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of histopathology, haematology, clinical biochemistry, and medical microbiology (including virology, parasitology, and infection control). BMC Clinical Pathology (ISSN 1472-6890) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological and histopathological profile of malignant melanoma in Malawi. Reference intervals for serum cystatin C and serum creatinine in an adult sub-Saharan African population. Clinical significance of HER2 and EGFR expression in colorectal cancer patients with ovarian metastasis. Accidental intoxications in toddlers: lack of cross-reactivity of vilazodone and its urinary metabolite M17 with drug of abuse screening immunoassays. HER2 overexpression and correlation with other significant clinicopathologic parameters in Ivorian breast cancer women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1