PDT的体内单线态氧阈剂量。

Timothy C Zhu, Michele M Kim, Xing Liang, Jarod C Finlay, Theresa M Busch
{"title":"PDT的体内单线态氧阈剂量。","authors":"Timothy C Zhu,&nbsp;Michele M Kim,&nbsp;Xing Liang,&nbsp;Jarod C Finlay,&nbsp;Theresa M Busch","doi":"10.1515/plm-2014-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dosimetry of singlet oxygen (<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>) is of particular interest because it is the major cytotoxic agent causing biological effects for type-II photosensitizers during photodynamic therapy (PDT). An <i>in-vivo</i> model to determine the singlet oxygen threshold dose, [<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>rx,sh</sub>, for PDT was developed.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An <i>in-vivo</i> radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) tumor mouse model was used to correlate the radius of necrosis to the calculation based on explicit PDT dosimetry of light fluence distribution, tissue optical properties, and photosensitizer concentrations. Inputs to the model include five photosensitizer-specific photochemical parameters along with [<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>rx,sh</sub>. Photosensitizer-specific model parameters were determined for benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD) and compared with two other type-II photosensitizers, Photofrin<sup>®</sup> and m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) from the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values (standard deviation) of the <i>in-vivo</i> [<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>rx,sh</sub> are approximately 0.56 (0.26) and 0.72 (0.21) mM (or 3.6×10<sup>7</sup> and 4.6×10<sup>7</sup> singlet oxygen per cell to reduce the cell survival to 1/e) for Photofrin<sup>®</sup> and BPD, respectively, assuming that the fraction of generated singlet oxygen that interacts with the cell is 1. While the values for the photochemical parameters (ξ, σ, <i>g</i>, β) used for BPD were preliminary and may need further refinement, there is reasonable confidence for the values of the singlet oxygen threshold doses.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In comparison, the [<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>rx,sh</sub> value derived from <i>in-vivo</i> mouse study was reported to be 0.4 mM for mTHPC-PDT. However, the singlet oxygen required per cell is reported to be 9×10<sup>8</sup> per cell per 1/<i>e</i> fractional kill in an <i>in-vitro</i> mTHPC-PDT study on a rat prostate cancer cell line (MLL cells) and is reported to be 7.9 mM for a multicell <i>in-vitro</i> EMT6/Ro spheroid model for mTHPC-PDT. A theoretical analysis is provided to relate the number of <i>in-vitro</i> singlet oxygen required per cell to reach cell killing of 1/<i>e</i> to <i>in-vivo</i> singlet oxygen threshold dose (in mM). The sensitivity of threshold singlet oxygen dose for our experiment is examined. The possible influence of vascular vs. apoptotic cell killing mechanisms on the singlet oxygen threshold dose is discussed by comparing [<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>rx,sh</sub> for BPD with 3 hr and 15 min drug-light-intervals, with the later being known to have a dominantly vascular effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The experimental results of threshold singlet oxygen concentration in an <i>in-vivo</i> RIF tumor model for Photofrin<sup>®</sup>, BPD, and mTHPC are about 20 times smaller than those observed <i>in vitro</i>. These results are consistent with knowledge that factors other than singlet oxygen-mediated tumor cell killing can contribute to PDT damage <i>in-vivo</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":20126,"journal":{"name":"Photonics & Lasers in Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"59-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/plm-2014-0037","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In-vivo</i> singlet oxygen threshold doses for PDT.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy C Zhu,&nbsp;Michele M Kim,&nbsp;Xing Liang,&nbsp;Jarod C Finlay,&nbsp;Theresa M Busch\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/plm-2014-0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dosimetry of singlet oxygen (<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>) is of particular interest because it is the major cytotoxic agent causing biological effects for type-II photosensitizers during photodynamic therapy (PDT). An <i>in-vivo</i> model to determine the singlet oxygen threshold dose, [<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>rx,sh</sub>, for PDT was developed.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An <i>in-vivo</i> radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) tumor mouse model was used to correlate the radius of necrosis to the calculation based on explicit PDT dosimetry of light fluence distribution, tissue optical properties, and photosensitizer concentrations. Inputs to the model include five photosensitizer-specific photochemical parameters along with [<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>rx,sh</sub>. Photosensitizer-specific model parameters were determined for benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD) and compared with two other type-II photosensitizers, Photofrin<sup>®</sup> and m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) from the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values (standard deviation) of the <i>in-vivo</i> [<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>rx,sh</sub> are approximately 0.56 (0.26) and 0.72 (0.21) mM (or 3.6×10<sup>7</sup> and 4.6×10<sup>7</sup> singlet oxygen per cell to reduce the cell survival to 1/e) for Photofrin<sup>®</sup> and BPD, respectively, assuming that the fraction of generated singlet oxygen that interacts with the cell is 1. While the values for the photochemical parameters (ξ, σ, <i>g</i>, β) used for BPD were preliminary and may need further refinement, there is reasonable confidence for the values of the singlet oxygen threshold doses.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In comparison, the [<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>rx,sh</sub> value derived from <i>in-vivo</i> mouse study was reported to be 0.4 mM for mTHPC-PDT. However, the singlet oxygen required per cell is reported to be 9×10<sup>8</sup> per cell per 1/<i>e</i> fractional kill in an <i>in-vitro</i> mTHPC-PDT study on a rat prostate cancer cell line (MLL cells) and is reported to be 7.9 mM for a multicell <i>in-vitro</i> EMT6/Ro spheroid model for mTHPC-PDT. A theoretical analysis is provided to relate the number of <i>in-vitro</i> singlet oxygen required per cell to reach cell killing of 1/<i>e</i> to <i>in-vivo</i> singlet oxygen threshold dose (in mM). The sensitivity of threshold singlet oxygen dose for our experiment is examined. The possible influence of vascular vs. apoptotic cell killing mechanisms on the singlet oxygen threshold dose is discussed by comparing [<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>rx,sh</sub> for BPD with 3 hr and 15 min drug-light-intervals, with the later being known to have a dominantly vascular effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The experimental results of threshold singlet oxygen concentration in an <i>in-vivo</i> RIF tumor model for Photofrin<sup>®</sup>, BPD, and mTHPC are about 20 times smaller than those observed <i>in vitro</i>. These results are consistent with knowledge that factors other than singlet oxygen-mediated tumor cell killing can contribute to PDT damage <i>in-vivo</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photonics & Lasers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"59-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/plm-2014-0037\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photonics & Lasers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/plm-2014-0037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photonics & Lasers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/plm-2014-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

目的:单线态氧(1O2)的剂量测定特别有趣,因为它是在光动力治疗(PDT)中引起ii型光敏剂生物效应的主要细胞毒剂。建立了PDT单线态氧阈剂量[1O2]rx,sh的体内模型。材料和方法:使用体内辐射诱导的纤维肉瘤(RIF)肿瘤小鼠模型,根据明确的PDT剂量法计算光通量分布、组织光学性质和光敏剂浓度,将坏死半径与计算相关联。该模型的输入包括五个光敏剂特异性光化学参数以及[1O2]rx,sh。确定了苯并卟啉衍生物单酸环A (BPD)的光敏剂特异性模型参数,并与文献中其他两种ii型光敏剂Photofrin®和m-四羟基苯基氯(mTHPC)进行了比较。结果:假设产生的与细胞相互作用的单线态氧的比例为1,那么Photofrin®和BPD的体内[10o2]rx和sh的平均值(标准差)分别约为0.56(0.26)和0.72 (0.21)mM(或3.6×107和4.6×107每个细胞的单线态氧将细胞存活率降低到1/e)。虽然用于BPD的光化学参数(ξ, σ, g, β)的值是初步的,可能需要进一步改进,但单线态氧阈剂量的值有合理的置信度。讨论:相比之下,据报道,mTHPC-PDT在小鼠体内研究中得到的[1O2]rx,sh值为0.4 mM。然而,据报道,在对大鼠前列腺癌细胞系(MLL细胞)的体外mTHPC-PDT研究中,每个细胞每1/e分数杀死所需的单线态氧为9×108,而在mTHPC-PDT的多细胞体外EMT6/Ro球体模型中,单线态氧为7.9 mM。理论上分析了每个细胞达到1/e细胞杀伤所需的体外单线态氧的数量与体内单线态氧阈值剂量(单位mM)之间的关系。考察了阈值单重态氧剂量对本实验的灵敏度。血管与凋亡细胞杀伤机制对单线态氧阈剂量的可能影响通过比较[1O2]rx,sh与3小时和15分钟的药物-光间隔来讨论,后者已知具有主要的血管作用。结论:体内RIF肿瘤模型中Photofrin®、BPD和mTHPC的阈值单线态氧浓度实验结果比体外观察结果小约20倍。这些结果与除单线态氧介导的肿瘤细胞杀伤外的其他因素可以促进体内PDT损伤的知识一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In-vivo singlet oxygen threshold doses for PDT.

Objective: Dosimetry of singlet oxygen (1O2) is of particular interest because it is the major cytotoxic agent causing biological effects for type-II photosensitizers during photodynamic therapy (PDT). An in-vivo model to determine the singlet oxygen threshold dose, [1O2]rx,sh, for PDT was developed.

Material and methods: An in-vivo radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) tumor mouse model was used to correlate the radius of necrosis to the calculation based on explicit PDT dosimetry of light fluence distribution, tissue optical properties, and photosensitizer concentrations. Inputs to the model include five photosensitizer-specific photochemical parameters along with [1O2]rx,sh. Photosensitizer-specific model parameters were determined for benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD) and compared with two other type-II photosensitizers, Photofrin® and m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) from the literature.

Results: The mean values (standard deviation) of the in-vivo [1O2]rx,sh are approximately 0.56 (0.26) and 0.72 (0.21) mM (or 3.6×107 and 4.6×107 singlet oxygen per cell to reduce the cell survival to 1/e) for Photofrin® and BPD, respectively, assuming that the fraction of generated singlet oxygen that interacts with the cell is 1. While the values for the photochemical parameters (ξ, σ, g, β) used for BPD were preliminary and may need further refinement, there is reasonable confidence for the values of the singlet oxygen threshold doses.

Discussion: In comparison, the [1O2]rx,sh value derived from in-vivo mouse study was reported to be 0.4 mM for mTHPC-PDT. However, the singlet oxygen required per cell is reported to be 9×108 per cell per 1/e fractional kill in an in-vitro mTHPC-PDT study on a rat prostate cancer cell line (MLL cells) and is reported to be 7.9 mM for a multicell in-vitro EMT6/Ro spheroid model for mTHPC-PDT. A theoretical analysis is provided to relate the number of in-vitro singlet oxygen required per cell to reach cell killing of 1/e to in-vivo singlet oxygen threshold dose (in mM). The sensitivity of threshold singlet oxygen dose for our experiment is examined. The possible influence of vascular vs. apoptotic cell killing mechanisms on the singlet oxygen threshold dose is discussed by comparing [1O2]rx,sh for BPD with 3 hr and 15 min drug-light-intervals, with the later being known to have a dominantly vascular effect.

Conclusions: The experimental results of threshold singlet oxygen concentration in an in-vivo RIF tumor model for Photofrin®, BPD, and mTHPC are about 20 times smaller than those observed in vitro. These results are consistent with knowledge that factors other than singlet oxygen-mediated tumor cell killing can contribute to PDT damage in-vivo.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FLIM and PLIM in biomedical research – An innovative way to combine autofluorescence and oxygen measurements Use of a 1318 nm Nd:YAG laser for the resection of limited forms of pulmonary tuberculosis Can laser therapy be the answer for radiodermatitis in anal cancer patients? Two case reports Hydrogen peroxide detection in viable and apoptotic tumor cells under action of cisplatin and bleomycin LMTB winner of the Innovation Award Berlin Brandenburg 2015
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1