Ewa Skulskal, Beata Młynarczyk-Bonikowska, Szymon Walter de Walthoffen, Grażyna Młynarczyk, Magdalena Malejczyk, Sławomir Majewski
{"title":"[实时荧光定量PCR与细菌培养在华沙医科大学皮肤性病科淋病实验室诊断中的比较]。","authors":"Ewa Skulskal, Beata Młynarczyk-Bonikowska, Szymon Walter de Walthoffen, Grażyna Młynarczyk, Magdalena Malejczyk, Sławomir Majewski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gonorrhoea is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases in the world. Fast and effective laboratory diagnostics of the infection is very important. The aim of the study was to compare Real-Time PCR and bacterial culture in diagnostics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients of Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Warsaw.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The urethral, cervical, anal and pharyngeal specimens from 93 patients of Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Warsaw were examined by two methods. The bacterial culture was performed on chocolate agar plates with antibiotics in the 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. N. gonorrhoeae was identified by colony-morphology, Gram stain and oxidase reaction, followed by carbohydrate utilization test. The DNA Bact Extra Pure Kit (Euroclone®) to isolate DNA was used. Real-Time PCR DUPLICα® Real-Time Neisseria gonorrhoeae 2nd Generation Detection Kit (Euroclone®) was performed using Smart Cycler® Dx.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 85.9% of results of Real-Time PCR and culture were identical. The remaining 14.1% of samples were culture negative and PCR positive. The results ofthe Real-Time PCR and culture were more often concordant in the case of samples obtained from men (96.8%) than from woman (85%). In patients after treatment with antibiotics the concordance of the results obtained with these two methods was 81%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In laboratory diagnostics of N. gonorrhoeae infections, Real-Time PCR was more sensitive than the culture, but in some cases it was less specific.</p>","PeriodicalId":18521,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","volume":"67 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Comparison of Real-Time PCR and bacterial culture in laboratory diagnostics of gonorrhoea in patients of Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Warsaw].\",\"authors\":\"Ewa Skulskal, Beata Młynarczyk-Bonikowska, Szymon Walter de Walthoffen, Grażyna Młynarczyk, Magdalena Malejczyk, Sławomir Majewski\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gonorrhoea is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases in the world. Fast and effective laboratory diagnostics of the infection is very important. The aim of the study was to compare Real-Time PCR and bacterial culture in diagnostics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients of Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Warsaw.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The urethral, cervical, anal and pharyngeal specimens from 93 patients of Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Warsaw were examined by two methods. The bacterial culture was performed on chocolate agar plates with antibiotics in the 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. N. gonorrhoeae was identified by colony-morphology, Gram stain and oxidase reaction, followed by carbohydrate utilization test. The DNA Bact Extra Pure Kit (Euroclone®) to isolate DNA was used. Real-Time PCR DUPLICα® Real-Time Neisseria gonorrhoeae 2nd Generation Detection Kit (Euroclone®) was performed using Smart Cycler® Dx.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 85.9% of results of Real-Time PCR and culture were identical. The remaining 14.1% of samples were culture negative and PCR positive. The results ofthe Real-Time PCR and culture were more often concordant in the case of samples obtained from men (96.8%) than from woman (85%). In patients after treatment with antibiotics the concordance of the results obtained with these two methods was 81%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In laboratory diagnostics of N. gonorrhoeae infections, Real-Time PCR was more sensitive than the culture, but in some cases it was less specific.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"29-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
淋病是世界上最常见的性传播疾病之一。对感染进行快速有效的实验室诊断非常重要。本研究的目的是比较实时荧光定量PCR和细菌培养对华沙医科大学皮肤性病科患者淋病奈瑟菌感染的诊断效果。方法:采用两种方法对华沙医科大学皮肤性病科93例患者的尿道、宫颈、肛门和咽标本进行检查。细菌培养在含抗生素的巧克力琼脂板上进行,环境为5% CO2,温度为37℃。通过菌落形态、革兰氏染色和氧化酶反应鉴定淋病奈瑟菌,并进行碳水化合物利用试验。使用DNA Bact Extra Pure Kit (Euroclone®)分离DNA。Real-Time PCR DUPLICα®Real-Time淋病奈瑟菌第二代检测试剂盒(Euroclone®)采用Smart Cycler®Dx检测。结果:85.9%的结果与培养结果一致。其余14.1%的样品为培养阴性和PCR阳性。Real-Time PCR和培养的结果在男性(96.8%)比女性(85%)的样本中更为一致。在抗生素治疗后的患者中,两种方法结果的一致性为81%。结论:在淋病奈瑟菌感染的实验室诊断中,实时荧光定量PCR比培养法更敏感,但在某些情况下特异性较低。
[The Comparison of Real-Time PCR and bacterial culture in laboratory diagnostics of gonorrhoea in patients of Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Warsaw].
Introduction: Gonorrhoea is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases in the world. Fast and effective laboratory diagnostics of the infection is very important. The aim of the study was to compare Real-Time PCR and bacterial culture in diagnostics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients of Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Warsaw.
Methods: The urethral, cervical, anal and pharyngeal specimens from 93 patients of Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Warsaw were examined by two methods. The bacterial culture was performed on chocolate agar plates with antibiotics in the 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. N. gonorrhoeae was identified by colony-morphology, Gram stain and oxidase reaction, followed by carbohydrate utilization test. The DNA Bact Extra Pure Kit (Euroclone®) to isolate DNA was used. Real-Time PCR DUPLICα® Real-Time Neisseria gonorrhoeae 2nd Generation Detection Kit (Euroclone®) was performed using Smart Cycler® Dx.
Results: In 85.9% of results of Real-Time PCR and culture were identical. The remaining 14.1% of samples were culture negative and PCR positive. The results ofthe Real-Time PCR and culture were more often concordant in the case of samples obtained from men (96.8%) than from woman (85%). In patients after treatment with antibiotics the concordance of the results obtained with these two methods was 81%.
Conclusions: In laboratory diagnostics of N. gonorrhoeae infections, Real-Time PCR was more sensitive than the culture, but in some cases it was less specific.