冠状病毒大流行期间难民营中难民的能动性和应对策略:人种学视角。

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Comparative Migration Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1186/s40878-022-00302-3
Claudia Böhme, Anett Schmitz
{"title":"冠状病毒大流行期间难民营中难民的能动性和应对策略:人种学视角。","authors":"Claudia Böhme, Anett Schmitz","doi":"10.1186/s40878-022-00302-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global spread of the coronavirus pandemic has particularly dramatic consequences for the lives of migrants and refugees living in already marginalised and restricted conditions, whose ongoing crisis is at risk of being overlooked. But refugees are not only extremely vulnerable and at risk of infection, as several reports show, quickly develop their own protection measures like the production of hygienic products, the publication of their situation and calls for action and help. Therefore, this paper aims to research the effects of the coronavirus crisis on refugees in camp settings with a special ethnographic focus on how refugees actively deal with this crisis and if they, through already developed resilience, are capable of adapting to the restrictions as well as inventing strategies to cope with the difficult situation. To account for the variety of refugee camps as well as the different living conditions due to their locality, history and national asylum politics, we will look at three different locations, namely refugee asylum homes in Germany, hotspots on the Greek islands as well as one refugee camp in Kenya. The main questions will be how, under structurally and institutionally framed conditions of power and victimisation in refugee camps, forms of agency are established, made possible or limited. The goal is to show which strategies refugees apply to cope with the enhanced restrictions and exclusion, how they act to protect themselves and others from the virus and how they present and reflect their situation during the coronavirus pandemic. Finally, this discussion offers a new perspective to consider refugees not only as vulnerable victims, but also as actively engaged individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":37051,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Migration Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refugee's agency and coping strategies in refugee camps during the coronavirus pandemic: ethnographic perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Böhme, Anett Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40878-022-00302-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The global spread of the coronavirus pandemic has particularly dramatic consequences for the lives of migrants and refugees living in already marginalised and restricted conditions, whose ongoing crisis is at risk of being overlooked. But refugees are not only extremely vulnerable and at risk of infection, as several reports show, quickly develop their own protection measures like the production of hygienic products, the publication of their situation and calls for action and help. Therefore, this paper aims to research the effects of the coronavirus crisis on refugees in camp settings with a special ethnographic focus on how refugees actively deal with this crisis and if they, through already developed resilience, are capable of adapting to the restrictions as well as inventing strategies to cope with the difficult situation. To account for the variety of refugee camps as well as the different living conditions due to their locality, history and national asylum politics, we will look at three different locations, namely refugee asylum homes in Germany, hotspots on the Greek islands as well as one refugee camp in Kenya. The main questions will be how, under structurally and institutionally framed conditions of power and victimisation in refugee camps, forms of agency are established, made possible or limited. The goal is to show which strategies refugees apply to cope with the enhanced restrictions and exclusion, how they act to protect themselves and others from the virus and how they present and reflect their situation during the coronavirus pandemic. Finally, this discussion offers a new perspective to consider refugees not only as vulnerable victims, but also as actively engaged individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Migration Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402277/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Migration Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00302-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00302-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冠状病毒大流行病在全球的蔓延对生活在已经边缘化和受限制条件下的移民和难民的生活造成了特别严重的影响,他们的持续危机有可能被忽视。但是,正如一些报告所显示的那样,难民不仅极易受到感染,而且面临感染的风险,他们很快就制定了自己的保护措施,如生产卫生用品、公布他们的处境以及呼吁采取行动和提供帮助。因此,本文旨在研究冠状病毒危机对难民营环境中难民的影响,特别关注难民如何积极应对这场危机,以及他们是否能够通过已经发展起来的恢复能力来适应各种限制,并制定应对困境的策略。为了考虑到难民营的多样性以及因地域、历史和国家庇护政治而造成的不同生活条件,我们将考察三个不同的地点,即德国的难民庇护所、希腊岛屿上的热点地区以及肯尼亚的一个难民营。主要问题是,在难民营中权力和伤害的结构性和制度性框架条件下,代理权的形式是如何建立、成为可能或受到限制的。我们的目标是说明难民采用了哪些策略来应对更加严格的限制和排斥,他们如何保护自己和他人免受病毒侵害,以及他们在冠状病毒流行期间如何展示和反映自己的处境。最后,这一讨论提供了一个新的视角,不仅将难民视为脆弱的受害者,而且将其视为积极参与的个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refugee's agency and coping strategies in refugee camps during the coronavirus pandemic: ethnographic perspectives.

The global spread of the coronavirus pandemic has particularly dramatic consequences for the lives of migrants and refugees living in already marginalised and restricted conditions, whose ongoing crisis is at risk of being overlooked. But refugees are not only extremely vulnerable and at risk of infection, as several reports show, quickly develop their own protection measures like the production of hygienic products, the publication of their situation and calls for action and help. Therefore, this paper aims to research the effects of the coronavirus crisis on refugees in camp settings with a special ethnographic focus on how refugees actively deal with this crisis and if they, through already developed resilience, are capable of adapting to the restrictions as well as inventing strategies to cope with the difficult situation. To account for the variety of refugee camps as well as the different living conditions due to their locality, history and national asylum politics, we will look at three different locations, namely refugee asylum homes in Germany, hotspots on the Greek islands as well as one refugee camp in Kenya. The main questions will be how, under structurally and institutionally framed conditions of power and victimisation in refugee camps, forms of agency are established, made possible or limited. The goal is to show which strategies refugees apply to cope with the enhanced restrictions and exclusion, how they act to protect themselves and others from the virus and how they present and reflect their situation during the coronavirus pandemic. Finally, this discussion offers a new perspective to consider refugees not only as vulnerable victims, but also as actively engaged individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Migration Studies
Comparative Migration Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Standardised integration requirements for naturalisation: less rights and less discretion? A qualitative meta-analysis of ethnographic studies of naturalisation procedures in Europe Who are the immigrants that Israeli Jews prefer? The interplay between reasons for migration, religion, and religiosity Saving behavior among immigrant and native youth De-migranticizing as methodology: rethinking migration studies through immobility and liminality Ambiguous citizenship policies: Examining implementation gaps across levels of legislation in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1