运动治疗慢性腰痛患者自我效能感在残疾改善中的调节作用

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2022-08-29 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/4203138
Yuta Shinohara, Kenta Wakaizumi, Aiko Ishikawa, Mari Ito, Reiko Hoshino, Chisato Tanaka, Saki Takaoka, Michiyuki Kawakami, Osahiko Tsuji, Daisuke Fujisawa, Toshiyuki Fujiwara, Tetsuya Tsuji, Hiroshi Morisaki, Shizuko Kosugi
{"title":"运动治疗慢性腰痛患者自我效能感在残疾改善中的调节作用","authors":"Yuta Shinohara,&nbsp;Kenta Wakaizumi,&nbsp;Aiko Ishikawa,&nbsp;Mari Ito,&nbsp;Reiko Hoshino,&nbsp;Chisato Tanaka,&nbsp;Saki Takaoka,&nbsp;Michiyuki Kawakami,&nbsp;Osahiko Tsuji,&nbsp;Daisuke Fujisawa,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Fujiwara,&nbsp;Tetsuya Tsuji,&nbsp;Hiroshi Morisaki,&nbsp;Shizuko Kosugi","doi":"10.1155/2022/4203138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The biopsychosocial mechanism by which exercise leads to improvement in chronic low back pain (CLBP) remains unstudied. This prospective cohort study was performed to examine the effectiveness of exercise on pain, disability, and psychological status for CLBP. We also tested path analytic models in which changes in these variables were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CLBP patients who visited the Interdisciplinary Pain Center of Keio University Hospital from July 2018 to April 2020 were included. The propensity score matching was performed between patients who underwent exercise (the exercise group) and those who did not (the control group). At the first visit and at the 3-month follow-up, pain (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)), disability (Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS)), and psychological status (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)) were assessed. Changes in pain and disability at the follow-up were compared between the groups. The relationships between changes in pain, disability, and psychological variables were examined using Pearson's correlation and mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly larger decrease in the PDAS was observed in the exercise group (<i>N</i> = 49) than in the control (<i>N</i> = 49) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Increased PSEQ scores were significantly correlated with decreased NRS scores in both groups. In the exercise group, decreased PDAS fully mediated the relationship between increased PSEQ and decreased NRS (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise improved disability, and the improved disability by exercise mediated the effect of increased self-efficacy on pain relief in CLBP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444439/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement in Disability Mediates the Effect of Self-Efficacy on Pain Relief in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients with Exercise Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Shinohara,&nbsp;Kenta Wakaizumi,&nbsp;Aiko Ishikawa,&nbsp;Mari Ito,&nbsp;Reiko Hoshino,&nbsp;Chisato Tanaka,&nbsp;Saki Takaoka,&nbsp;Michiyuki Kawakami,&nbsp;Osahiko Tsuji,&nbsp;Daisuke Fujisawa,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Fujiwara,&nbsp;Tetsuya Tsuji,&nbsp;Hiroshi Morisaki,&nbsp;Shizuko Kosugi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/4203138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The biopsychosocial mechanism by which exercise leads to improvement in chronic low back pain (CLBP) remains unstudied. This prospective cohort study was performed to examine the effectiveness of exercise on pain, disability, and psychological status for CLBP. We also tested path analytic models in which changes in these variables were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CLBP patients who visited the Interdisciplinary Pain Center of Keio University Hospital from July 2018 to April 2020 were included. The propensity score matching was performed between patients who underwent exercise (the exercise group) and those who did not (the control group). At the first visit and at the 3-month follow-up, pain (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)), disability (Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS)), and psychological status (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)) were assessed. Changes in pain and disability at the follow-up were compared between the groups. The relationships between changes in pain, disability, and psychological variables were examined using Pearson's correlation and mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly larger decrease in the PDAS was observed in the exercise group (<i>N</i> = 49) than in the control (<i>N</i> = 49) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Increased PSEQ scores were significantly correlated with decreased NRS scores in both groups. In the exercise group, decreased PDAS fully mediated the relationship between increased PSEQ and decreased NRS (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise improved disability, and the improved disability by exercise mediated the effect of increased self-efficacy on pain relief in CLBP patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444439/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4203138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4203138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:运动导致慢性腰痛(CLBP)改善的生物心理社会机制尚未研究。本前瞻性队列研究旨在研究运动对CLBP患者疼痛、残疾和心理状态的影响。我们还测试了路径分析模型,其中包括这些变量的变化。方法:纳入2018年7月至2020年4月在庆应义塾大学附属医院跨学科疼痛中心就诊的CLBP患者。在进行运动的患者(运动组)和未进行运动的患者(对照组)之间进行倾向评分匹配。在首次访视和随访3个月时,分别对患者的疼痛(数字评定量表(NRS))、残疾(疼痛残疾评定量表(PDAS))、心理状态(疼痛自我效能问卷(PSEQ)和疼痛灾难化量表(PCS))进行评估。在随访中比较两组之间疼痛和残疾的变化。使用Pearson相关分析和中介分析来检验疼痛、残疾和心理变量变化之间的关系。结果:运动组(N = 49) PDAS明显低于对照组(N = 49) (p < 0.05)。两组患者PSEQ评分升高与NRS评分降低显著相关。运动组PDAS降低完全介导PSEQ升高与NRS降低之间的关系(P < 0.05)。结论:运动改善残疾,运动改善残疾介导自我效能感提高对CLBP患者疼痛缓解的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improvement in Disability Mediates the Effect of Self-Efficacy on Pain Relief in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients with Exercise Therapy.

Background: The biopsychosocial mechanism by which exercise leads to improvement in chronic low back pain (CLBP) remains unstudied. This prospective cohort study was performed to examine the effectiveness of exercise on pain, disability, and psychological status for CLBP. We also tested path analytic models in which changes in these variables were included.

Methods: CLBP patients who visited the Interdisciplinary Pain Center of Keio University Hospital from July 2018 to April 2020 were included. The propensity score matching was performed between patients who underwent exercise (the exercise group) and those who did not (the control group). At the first visit and at the 3-month follow-up, pain (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)), disability (Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS)), and psychological status (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)) were assessed. Changes in pain and disability at the follow-up were compared between the groups. The relationships between changes in pain, disability, and psychological variables were examined using Pearson's correlation and mediation analysis.

Results: A significantly larger decrease in the PDAS was observed in the exercise group (N = 49) than in the control (N = 49) (p < 0.05). Increased PSEQ scores were significantly correlated with decreased NRS scores in both groups. In the exercise group, decreased PDAS fully mediated the relationship between increased PSEQ and decreased NRS (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Exercise improved disability, and the improved disability by exercise mediated the effect of increased self-efficacy on pain relief in CLBP patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring Everyday Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Secondary, Retrospective Analysis from ncRNAPain. Assessment of Clinical Analgesic Levels and Serum Biomarkers in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Diclofenac and Methotrexate Combined Therapy with Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy. Potential S1 Nerve Root Blocks Associated with Sacroiliac Joint Injections. Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Pain Resilience Scale among Lebanese Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Exploring the Analgesic Initiation Mechanism of Tuina in the Dorsal Root Ganglion of Minor CCI Rats via the TRPV1/TRPA1-cGMP Pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1