房颤患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的早期检测。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1097/JXX.0000000000000766
Madeleine Oster, Joshua D Thornsberry, Lindsay A Howard, Michele H Talley
{"title":"房颤患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的早期检测。","authors":"Madeleine Oster,&nbsp;Joshua D Thornsberry,&nbsp;Lindsay A Howard,&nbsp;Michele H Talley","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000000766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent and modifiable risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) and correlates with a three-fold higher risk of incident AF. Although OSA is prevalent in patients with AF, it remains underdiagnosed. Guidelines for OSA screening are ambiguous.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>A small community hospital in the southeast United States lacked standardized OSA screening and consistent sleep clinic referral for hospitalized patients with AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 3 months, an OSA bundle (including screening, education, and referral) was implemented for hospitalized patients with AF. A retrospective electronic health record (EHR) review established a baseline comparison group. Descriptive analyses between the intervention and comparison groups evaluated the effectiveness of the OSA bundle.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Eligible patients received OSA screening with the STOP-Bang questionnaire. A STOP-Bang score of 3 or higher triggered patient education about the arrhythmogenic relationship of OSA and AF. At discharge, patients received an ambulatory sleep clinic referral. After 3 months, an EHR review assessed the rate of sleep clinic follow-up, sleep testing, OSA diagnosis, and initiation of positive airway pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 68 patients in the comparison group and 33 patients in the intervention group, the rate of OSA screening increased from 4.4% to 100%. Sleep clinic referral increased from 66.7% to 93.5%. Sleep clinic follow-up increased from 0% to 10%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening for OSA and sleep clinic referral improved with the OSA bundle; however, sleep clinic follow-up remained low. Further quantitative and qualitative investigation is needed to better understand barriers to sleep clinic follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":48812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":"34 9","pages":"1083-1089"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early detection of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine Oster,&nbsp;Joshua D Thornsberry,&nbsp;Lindsay A Howard,&nbsp;Michele H Talley\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JXX.0000000000000766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent and modifiable risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) and correlates with a three-fold higher risk of incident AF. Although OSA is prevalent in patients with AF, it remains underdiagnosed. Guidelines for OSA screening are ambiguous.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>A small community hospital in the southeast United States lacked standardized OSA screening and consistent sleep clinic referral for hospitalized patients with AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 3 months, an OSA bundle (including screening, education, and referral) was implemented for hospitalized patients with AF. A retrospective electronic health record (EHR) review established a baseline comparison group. Descriptive analyses between the intervention and comparison groups evaluated the effectiveness of the OSA bundle.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Eligible patients received OSA screening with the STOP-Bang questionnaire. A STOP-Bang score of 3 or higher triggered patient education about the arrhythmogenic relationship of OSA and AF. At discharge, patients received an ambulatory sleep clinic referral. After 3 months, an EHR review assessed the rate of sleep clinic follow-up, sleep testing, OSA diagnosis, and initiation of positive airway pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 68 patients in the comparison group and 33 patients in the intervention group, the rate of OSA screening increased from 4.4% to 100%. Sleep clinic referral increased from 66.7% to 93.5%. Sleep clinic follow-up increased from 0% to 10%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screening for OSA and sleep clinic referral improved with the OSA bundle; however, sleep clinic follow-up remained low. Further quantitative and qualitative investigation is needed to better understand barriers to sleep clinic follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"1083-1089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000766\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是房颤(AF)的独立且可改变的危险因素,与房颤发生风险增加3倍相关。尽管OSA在房颤患者中普遍存在,但仍未得到充分诊断。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停筛查的指南是不明确的。局部问题:美国东南部的一家小型社区医院缺乏标准化的OSA筛查和房颤住院患者一致的睡眠门诊转诊。方法:对房颤住院患者实施了超过3个月的OSA一揽子计划(包括筛查、教育和转诊)。回顾性电子健康记录(EHR)审查建立了基线对照组。干预组和对照组之间的描述性分析评估了OSA捆绑治疗的有效性。干预措施:符合条件的患者使用STOP-Bang问卷进行OSA筛查。STOP-Bang评分达到3分或更高时,患者就会被告知OSA和房颤的致心律失常关系。出院时,患者接受门诊睡眠转诊。3个月后,电子病历回顾评估了睡眠门诊随访、睡眠测试、OSA诊断和气道正压通气的发生率。结果:对照组68例,干预组33例,OSA筛查率由4.4%提高到100%。睡眠门诊转诊由66.7%上升至93.5%。睡眠门诊随访从0%增加到10%。结论:OSA bundle改善了OSA筛查和睡眠临床转诊;然而,睡眠诊所随访率仍然很低。需要进一步的定量和定性研究来更好地了解睡眠临床随访的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early detection of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent and modifiable risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) and correlates with a three-fold higher risk of incident AF. Although OSA is prevalent in patients with AF, it remains underdiagnosed. Guidelines for OSA screening are ambiguous.

Local problem: A small community hospital in the southeast United States lacked standardized OSA screening and consistent sleep clinic referral for hospitalized patients with AF.

Methods: Over 3 months, an OSA bundle (including screening, education, and referral) was implemented for hospitalized patients with AF. A retrospective electronic health record (EHR) review established a baseline comparison group. Descriptive analyses between the intervention and comparison groups evaluated the effectiveness of the OSA bundle.

Interventions: Eligible patients received OSA screening with the STOP-Bang questionnaire. A STOP-Bang score of 3 or higher triggered patient education about the arrhythmogenic relationship of OSA and AF. At discharge, patients received an ambulatory sleep clinic referral. After 3 months, an EHR review assessed the rate of sleep clinic follow-up, sleep testing, OSA diagnosis, and initiation of positive airway pressure.

Results: Of the 68 patients in the comparison group and 33 patients in the intervention group, the rate of OSA screening increased from 4.4% to 100%. Sleep clinic referral increased from 66.7% to 93.5%. Sleep clinic follow-up increased from 0% to 10%.

Conclusion: Screening for OSA and sleep clinic referral improved with the OSA bundle; however, sleep clinic follow-up remained low. Further quantitative and qualitative investigation is needed to better understand barriers to sleep clinic follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-NURSING
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
期刊最新文献
Unregulated male sexual enhancement treatments: Perils and pitfalls for patients and providers Enhancing competency-based assessment: Implementing oral boards in nursing education Enhancing foot care education and support strategies in adults with type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study The important primary care role of neonatal nurse practitioners in the neonatal intensive care unit. Bridging the education-practice gap: Changing nurse practitioner skills through education innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1