诊断假定耐多药结核病患者的常规和新型分子检测的实验室成本分析。

IF 1 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Global Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2022-08-26 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jgid.jgid_309_21
Raj Narayan Yadav, Ajoy Kumar Verma, Gaurav Kaushik
{"title":"诊断假定耐多药结核病患者的常规和新型分子检测的实验室成本分析。","authors":"Raj Narayan Yadav,&nbsp;Ajoy Kumar Verma,&nbsp;Gaurav Kaushik","doi":"10.4103/jgid.jgid_309_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a deadliest infectious disease. Lack of rapid test with low cost is one of the important challenges to eradicate the TB. The objective of the study was to analyze the laboratory costs of conventional and newer molecular tests, for diagnosis of presumptive multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A detailed laboratory cost of various conventional tests (Ziehl - Neelsen [ZN] microscopy, light-emitting diode-fluorescent microscopy [LED-FM], culture and drug susceptibility testing [DST] using solid Lowenstein-Jensen media and liquid media [BACTEC MGIT 960]) was compared with rapid methods (GenoType MTBDR<i>plus</i> line probe assay [LPA] and GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay). Laboratory cost was also calculated in terms of cost per TB and MDR-TB case detected by using different diagnostic scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cost per test for ZN microscopy, LED-FM, LPA, GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay, solid culture plus DST, liquid culture plus DST was found as $2.5 (INR 156.8), $2.0 (INR128.9), $18.6 (INR1210), $13.8 (INR 895.2), $21.5 (INR 1396.6), and $29.1 (INR 1888.2), respectively. The laboratory cost for detecting TB and MDR-TB by diagnostic scenarios involving molecular DST was found to be less as compared to involving only conventional liquid culture-based test.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of rapid molecular tests with selective use of liquid culture-based DST may be less in cost as compared to the use of culture-based DST alone, at high burden reference TB laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":51581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1f/21/JGID-14-93.PMC9552341.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laboratory Cost Analysis of Conventional and Newer Molecular Tests for Diagnosis of Presumptive Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Raj Narayan Yadav,&nbsp;Ajoy Kumar Verma,&nbsp;Gaurav Kaushik\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jgid.jgid_309_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a deadliest infectious disease. Lack of rapid test with low cost is one of the important challenges to eradicate the TB. The objective of the study was to analyze the laboratory costs of conventional and newer molecular tests, for diagnosis of presumptive multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A detailed laboratory cost of various conventional tests (Ziehl - Neelsen [ZN] microscopy, light-emitting diode-fluorescent microscopy [LED-FM], culture and drug susceptibility testing [DST] using solid Lowenstein-Jensen media and liquid media [BACTEC MGIT 960]) was compared with rapid methods (GenoType MTBDR<i>plus</i> line probe assay [LPA] and GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay). Laboratory cost was also calculated in terms of cost per TB and MDR-TB case detected by using different diagnostic scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cost per test for ZN microscopy, LED-FM, LPA, GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay, solid culture plus DST, liquid culture plus DST was found as $2.5 (INR 156.8), $2.0 (INR128.9), $18.6 (INR1210), $13.8 (INR 895.2), $21.5 (INR 1396.6), and $29.1 (INR 1888.2), respectively. The laboratory cost for detecting TB and MDR-TB by diagnostic scenarios involving molecular DST was found to be less as compared to involving only conventional liquid culture-based test.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of rapid molecular tests with selective use of liquid culture-based DST may be less in cost as compared to the use of culture-based DST alone, at high burden reference TB laboratory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1f/21/JGID-14-93.PMC9552341.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jgid.jgid_309_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jgid.jgid_309_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

结核病(TB)仍然是一种致命的传染病。缺乏低成本的快速检测是根除结核病的重要挑战之一。这项研究的目的是分析用于诊断假定的耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)患者的传统和较新的分子检测的实验室费用。方法:将各种常规检测方法(Ziehl - Neelsen [ZN]显微镜、发光二极管-荧光显微镜[LED-FM]、培养和药敏试验[DST]使用固体Lowenstein-Jensen培养基和液体培养基[BACTEC MGIT 960])与快速检测方法(GenoType MTBDRplus线探针检测[LPA]和GeneXpert MTB/RIF检测)的详细实验室成本进行比较。实验室费用也按使用不同诊断情景检测到的每个结核病和耐多药结核病病例的费用计算。结果:锌显微镜、LED-FM、LPA、GeneXpert MTB/RIF检测、固体培养+ DST、液体培养+ DST的每次检测成本分别为2.5美元(156.8卢比)、2.0美元(128.9卢比)、18.6美元(1210卢比)、13.8美元(895.2卢比)、21.5美元(1396.6卢比)和29.1美元(1888.2卢比)。发现通过涉及分子DST的诊断方案检测结核病和耐多药结核病的实验室费用低于仅涉及传统的基于液体培养的检测。结论:在高负担结核病参考实验室中,选择性使用基于液体培养物的DST进行快速分子检测可能比单独使用基于培养物的DST成本更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laboratory Cost Analysis of Conventional and Newer Molecular Tests for Diagnosis of Presumptive Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients.

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a deadliest infectious disease. Lack of rapid test with low cost is one of the important challenges to eradicate the TB. The objective of the study was to analyze the laboratory costs of conventional and newer molecular tests, for diagnosis of presumptive multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) patients.

Methods: A detailed laboratory cost of various conventional tests (Ziehl - Neelsen [ZN] microscopy, light-emitting diode-fluorescent microscopy [LED-FM], culture and drug susceptibility testing [DST] using solid Lowenstein-Jensen media and liquid media [BACTEC MGIT 960]) was compared with rapid methods (GenoType MTBDRplus line probe assay [LPA] and GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay). Laboratory cost was also calculated in terms of cost per TB and MDR-TB case detected by using different diagnostic scenarios.

Results: Cost per test for ZN microscopy, LED-FM, LPA, GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay, solid culture plus DST, liquid culture plus DST was found as $2.5 (INR 156.8), $2.0 (INR128.9), $18.6 (INR1210), $13.8 (INR 895.2), $21.5 (INR 1396.6), and $29.1 (INR 1888.2), respectively. The laboratory cost for detecting TB and MDR-TB by diagnostic scenarios involving molecular DST was found to be less as compared to involving only conventional liquid culture-based test.

Conclusions: The implementation of rapid molecular tests with selective use of liquid culture-based DST may be less in cost as compared to the use of culture-based DST alone, at high burden reference TB laboratory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: JGID encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Infectious Diseases across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in Infectious Diseases to promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
期刊最新文献
An Unusual Case of Pneumocystis jirovecii Cystic Pneumonia. Associated Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Bloodstream Infections among COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Detection of Chlamydial Heat Shock Protein 60 and 10 Antibody among Female Infertility. Paradoxical Reaction during Treatment of Tuberculous Meningoencephalitis in a Patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. State of the Globe: A Glimmer of Hope - Biomarkers for Diagnosing COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1