老年人尊严问卷的编制与心理测量评估。

Journal of Caring Sciences Pub Date : 2022-07-14 eCollection Date: 2022-08-01 DOI:10.34172/jcs.2022.19
Azadeh Nouri, Roghayeh Esmaeili, Tahereh Ashk Torab
{"title":"老年人尊严问卷的编制与心理测量评估。","authors":"Azadeh Nouri,&nbsp;Roghayeh Esmaeili,&nbsp;Tahereh Ashk Torab","doi":"10.34172/jcs.2022.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Respect for dignity is the core of nursing. Dignity assessment improves nurses' understanding of the level of people's need for it. Yet, there is no valid and reliable culturally-appropriate instrument for dignity assessment among elderly people in Iran. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Elderly Dignity Questionnaire (EDQ). <b>Methods:</b> The methodological study, EDQ items were generated based on the results of a qualitative study with conventional content analysis approach into dignity and the existing literature. For qualitative and quantitative face and content validity assessments, ten experts rated item then, item impact score and content validity ratio and index were calculated. Construct validity of EDQ was assessed via the exploratory factor analysis and using the data collected from 200 elderly people. Criterion validity was tested using the Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale. Reliability testing was performed via the internal consistency and the test-retest stability assessments and data was collected from twenty elderly. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 13. <b>Results:</b> Factor analysis loaded the forty items on six factors. factor six was combined with factor five due to its limited number of items. The five factors were labeled as roles and responsibilities (twelve items), familial and social relationships (seven items), self-dignity (ten items), authorization (four items), independence, and integrity (seven items). The Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient of EDQ were 0.91 and 0.86, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study confirms EDQ's validity and reliability. Thus, this questionnaire can be used for dignity in the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":15317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"11 3","pages":"148-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ab/c4/jcs-11-148.PMC9526795.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Elderly Dignity Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Azadeh Nouri,&nbsp;Roghayeh Esmaeili,&nbsp;Tahereh Ashk Torab\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jcs.2022.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Respect for dignity is the core of nursing. Dignity assessment improves nurses' understanding of the level of people's need for it. Yet, there is no valid and reliable culturally-appropriate instrument for dignity assessment among elderly people in Iran. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Elderly Dignity Questionnaire (EDQ). <b>Methods:</b> The methodological study, EDQ items were generated based on the results of a qualitative study with conventional content analysis approach into dignity and the existing literature. For qualitative and quantitative face and content validity assessments, ten experts rated item then, item impact score and content validity ratio and index were calculated. Construct validity of EDQ was assessed via the exploratory factor analysis and using the data collected from 200 elderly people. Criterion validity was tested using the Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale. Reliability testing was performed via the internal consistency and the test-retest stability assessments and data was collected from twenty elderly. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 13. <b>Results:</b> Factor analysis loaded the forty items on six factors. factor six was combined with factor five due to its limited number of items. The five factors were labeled as roles and responsibilities (twelve items), familial and social relationships (seven items), self-dignity (ten items), authorization (four items), independence, and integrity (seven items). The Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient of EDQ were 0.91 and 0.86, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study confirms EDQ's validity and reliability. Thus, this questionnaire can be used for dignity in the elderly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"148-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ab/c4/jcs-11-148.PMC9526795.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Caring Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2022.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2022.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:尊重尊严是护理的核心。尊严评估提高了护士对人们对尊严的需求程度的理解。然而,在伊朗的老年人中,没有有效和可靠的文化上适当的尊严评估工具。本研究旨在开发和评估老年人尊严问卷(EDQ)的心理测量特性。方法:方法学研究,EDQ项目生成基于定性研究结果与传统的内容分析方法的尊严和现有文献。在定性和定量的面子效度和内容效度评估中,由10位专家对项目进行打分,计算项目影响得分和内容效度比及指标。采用探索性因子分析和收集200名老年人的数据,对EDQ的结构效度进行评估。标准效度采用罗森博格自尊量表进行测试。通过内部一致性评估和重测稳定性评估进行信度检验,并收集20名老年人的数据。数据分析采用SPSS软件第13版。结果:因子分析对40项进行了6个因子的加载。由于项目数量有限,因子六与因子五结合在一起。这五个因素分别是:角色和责任(12个)、家庭和社会关系(7个)、自尊(10个)、授权(4个)、独立、正直(7个)。EDQ的Cronbach’s alpha和类内相关系数分别为0.91和0.86。结论:本研究证实了EDQ量表的效度和信度。因此,该问卷可以用于老年人的尊严。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Elderly Dignity Questionnaire.

Introduction: Respect for dignity is the core of nursing. Dignity assessment improves nurses' understanding of the level of people's need for it. Yet, there is no valid and reliable culturally-appropriate instrument for dignity assessment among elderly people in Iran. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Elderly Dignity Questionnaire (EDQ). Methods: The methodological study, EDQ items were generated based on the results of a qualitative study with conventional content analysis approach into dignity and the existing literature. For qualitative and quantitative face and content validity assessments, ten experts rated item then, item impact score and content validity ratio and index were calculated. Construct validity of EDQ was assessed via the exploratory factor analysis and using the data collected from 200 elderly people. Criterion validity was tested using the Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale. Reliability testing was performed via the internal consistency and the test-retest stability assessments and data was collected from twenty elderly. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 13. Results: Factor analysis loaded the forty items on six factors. factor six was combined with factor five due to its limited number of items. The five factors were labeled as roles and responsibilities (twelve items), familial and social relationships (seven items), self-dignity (ten items), authorization (four items), independence, and integrity (seven items). The Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient of EDQ were 0.91 and 0.86, respectively. Conclusion: This study confirms EDQ's validity and reliability. Thus, this questionnaire can be used for dignity in the elderly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nursing Students’ Attitudes Toward Seeking Psychological Help Associated to Self-Stigma and Perceived Social Stigma Effectiveness of Swallowing and Oral Care Interventions on Oral Intake and Salivary Flow of Patients Following Endotracheal Extubation at a Tertiary Care Center: A Randomized Controlled Trial Abnormal Burnout of Nurses in Crisis; Double Pressure of Low Support and Competence Psychometric Assessment of Infant Colic Scale in Iranian Population Novel Memories of Motherhood: Childbirth Lived Experiences of Mothers with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1