某大学医院药师对质子泵抑制剂处方的干预

Journal de pharmacie de Belgique Pub Date : 2015-06-01
S Skalli, C Bertin, N Charhon, C Mouchoux, E Huet, B Charpiat, A Janoly-Dumenil
{"title":"某大学医院药师对质子泵抑制剂处方的干预","authors":"S Skalli,&nbsp;C Bertin,&nbsp;N Charhon,&nbsp;C Mouchoux,&nbsp;E Huet,&nbsp;B Charpiat,&nbsp;A Janoly-Dumenil","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In France, efforts to optimize prescribing of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are rare. Various studies have shown that the prescription of these drugs is excessive. This has consequences regarding costs and iatrogenesis. The objective of this study was to describe the type of drug related problems (DRP) and pharmaceutical interventions reported by pharmacists practicing in a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drug related problems and pharmaceutical interventions (PI) made, were recorded on a database. They were classified according to the grid code of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Over a 3 years period, 132.890 prescriptions were analysed. 15.347 generated PI. Among them 701 (4.6%) concerned PPIs. Most frequently reported problems were: lack of indication or patients without a documented indication (24.4%), drug-drug interactions (22.4%) and inappropriate route or mode of administration (19.8%). Discontinuation has been proposed in 40.5% of cases, followed by substitution (22.0%) and dosage titration (17.3%). Physicians modified the prescription according to 51.3% of PI. The main PI, discontinuation therapy, is associated with over-prescription of this drug class. Nevertheless, the rate of DRP recorded (0.5%) is low compared to the high exposure of patients on PPIs and misuse (or overuse?) reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PI made during the analysis of prescription contributes to rationalizing the use of PPIs. The action of the pharmacist must be strengthened through training of health professionals, and communication strategies to improve practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":14736,"journal":{"name":"Journal de pharmacie de Belgique","volume":" 2","pages":"20-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Pharmacist's interventions on proton pump inhibitor prescriptions in a University Hospital].\",\"authors\":\"S Skalli,&nbsp;C Bertin,&nbsp;N Charhon,&nbsp;C Mouchoux,&nbsp;E Huet,&nbsp;B Charpiat,&nbsp;A Janoly-Dumenil\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In France, efforts to optimize prescribing of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are rare. Various studies have shown that the prescription of these drugs is excessive. This has consequences regarding costs and iatrogenesis. The objective of this study was to describe the type of drug related problems (DRP) and pharmaceutical interventions reported by pharmacists practicing in a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drug related problems and pharmaceutical interventions (PI) made, were recorded on a database. They were classified according to the grid code of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Over a 3 years period, 132.890 prescriptions were analysed. 15.347 generated PI. Among them 701 (4.6%) concerned PPIs. Most frequently reported problems were: lack of indication or patients without a documented indication (24.4%), drug-drug interactions (22.4%) and inappropriate route or mode of administration (19.8%). Discontinuation has been proposed in 40.5% of cases, followed by substitution (22.0%) and dosage titration (17.3%). Physicians modified the prescription according to 51.3% of PI. The main PI, discontinuation therapy, is associated with over-prescription of this drug class. Nevertheless, the rate of DRP recorded (0.5%) is low compared to the high exposure of patients on PPIs and misuse (or overuse?) reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PI made during the analysis of prescription contributes to rationalizing the use of PPIs. The action of the pharmacist must be strengthened through training of health professionals, and communication strategies to improve practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal de pharmacie de Belgique\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"20-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal de pharmacie de Belgique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de pharmacie de Belgique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在法国,优化质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)处方的努力很少。各种研究表明,这些药物的处方是过量的。这对成本和医源性有影响。本研究的目的是描述在大学医院执业的药剂师报告的药物相关问题(DRP)的类型和药物干预措施。方法:对药物相关问题和药物干预(PI)进行数据库记录。它们按照法国临床药学学会的网格代码进行分类。结果与讨论:3年共分析处方132.890张。15.347生成PI。其中701宗(4.6%)涉及ppi。最常见的报告问题是:缺乏适应证或患者无记录的适应证(24.4%),药物-药物相互作用(22.4%)和不适当的给药途径或方式(19.8%)。40.5%的病例建议停药,其次是替代(22.0%)和剂量滴定(17.3%)。医师根据51.3%的PI修改处方。主要的PI,即停药治疗,与该类药物的过度处方有关。然而,与文献中报道的PPIs患者的高暴露和滥用(或过度使用?)相比,记录的DRP率(0.5%)较低。结论:在处方分析过程中进行PI分析有助于ppi合理化使用。必须通过培训卫生专业人员和改进实践的沟通策略来加强药剂师的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Pharmacist's interventions on proton pump inhibitor prescriptions in a University Hospital].

Purpose: In France, efforts to optimize prescribing of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are rare. Various studies have shown that the prescription of these drugs is excessive. This has consequences regarding costs and iatrogenesis. The objective of this study was to describe the type of drug related problems (DRP) and pharmaceutical interventions reported by pharmacists practicing in a university hospital.

Methods: Drug related problems and pharmaceutical interventions (PI) made, were recorded on a database. They were classified according to the grid code of the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy.

Results and discussion: Over a 3 years period, 132.890 prescriptions were analysed. 15.347 generated PI. Among them 701 (4.6%) concerned PPIs. Most frequently reported problems were: lack of indication or patients without a documented indication (24.4%), drug-drug interactions (22.4%) and inappropriate route or mode of administration (19.8%). Discontinuation has been proposed in 40.5% of cases, followed by substitution (22.0%) and dosage titration (17.3%). Physicians modified the prescription according to 51.3% of PI. The main PI, discontinuation therapy, is associated with over-prescription of this drug class. Nevertheless, the rate of DRP recorded (0.5%) is low compared to the high exposure of patients on PPIs and misuse (or overuse?) reported in the literature.

Conclusion: PI made during the analysis of prescription contributes to rationalizing the use of PPIs. The action of the pharmacist must be strengthened through training of health professionals, and communication strategies to improve practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Hepatitis C]. [Essential oils: good advice by the pharmacist is necessary]. [Practical guidelines to ensure the quality of compounded preparations in community pharmacies]. [The social sciences at the Faculty of Pharmacy: and innovative course of community health at the University of Montreal]. [Pharmaceutical care for pediatric hemato-oncology and stem cell transplantation patients. Inventory of experiences and needs].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1