治疗妊娠糖尿病的预测性风险因素。

Clinical medicine insights. Women's health Pub Date : 2015-10-14 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.4137/CMWH.S31564
Lebriz Hale Aktun, Betul Yorgunlar, Nilay Karaca, Yaşam Kemal Akpak
{"title":"治疗妊娠糖尿病的预测性风险因素。","authors":"Lebriz Hale Aktun, Betul Yorgunlar, Nilay Karaca, Yaşam Kemal Akpak","doi":"10.4137/CMWH.S31564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate predictive risk factors in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 256 pregnant women who underwent 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during 24-28 weeks of pregnancy were included according to the World Health Organization criteria. Demographic characteristics of the patients, including age, parity, family history of diabetes, body weight before pregnancy, and body weight at the diagnosis of GDM, were recorded. Fasting insulin and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values at the time of diagnosis were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: those requiring insulin treatment (insulin group, n = 89) and those receiving diet therapy (diet group, n = 167) during pregnancy according to the American Diabetes Association recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34.76% of the pregnant women with GDM required insulin treatment. The mean age of these patients was significantly higher compared to the diet group (34.9 ± 0.6 years vs. 31.9 ± 0.6 years; P = 0.004). Body mass index before pregnancy was also significantly higher in the insulin group than that in the diet group (32 ± 0.9 kg/m(2) vs. 29 ± 0.7 kg/m(2); P = 0.004). Fasting blood glucose (FBG) during OGTT was 105.6 ± 2.1 mg/dL and 96.7 ± 1.1 mg/dL in the insulin group and diet group, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in fasting plasma glucose during OGTT between the groups (P = 0.069), while plasma glucose at two hours was 161.1 ± 6.8 mg/dL in the insulin group and 145.1 ± 3.7 mg/dL in the diet group (P = 0.027). At the time of diagnosis, HbA1c values were significantly higher in the insulin group compared to the diet group (5.3 ± 0.1 vs. 4.9 ± 0.1; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in FBG and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance values between the groups (P = 0.908, P = 0.073).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results suggest that age, family history of diabetes, body weight before pregnancy, FBG, and HbA1c values are predictors for the necessity of insulin treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":90142,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health","volume":"8 ","pages":"25-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Risk Factors in the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Lebriz Hale Aktun, Betul Yorgunlar, Nilay Karaca, Yaşam Kemal Akpak\",\"doi\":\"10.4137/CMWH.S31564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate predictive risk factors in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 256 pregnant women who underwent 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during 24-28 weeks of pregnancy were included according to the World Health Organization criteria. Demographic characteristics of the patients, including age, parity, family history of diabetes, body weight before pregnancy, and body weight at the diagnosis of GDM, were recorded. Fasting insulin and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values at the time of diagnosis were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: those requiring insulin treatment (insulin group, n = 89) and those receiving diet therapy (diet group, n = 167) during pregnancy according to the American Diabetes Association recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34.76% of the pregnant women with GDM required insulin treatment. The mean age of these patients was significantly higher compared to the diet group (34.9 ± 0.6 years vs. 31.9 ± 0.6 years; P = 0.004). Body mass index before pregnancy was also significantly higher in the insulin group than that in the diet group (32 ± 0.9 kg/m(2) vs. 29 ± 0.7 kg/m(2); P = 0.004). Fasting blood glucose (FBG) during OGTT was 105.6 ± 2.1 mg/dL and 96.7 ± 1.1 mg/dL in the insulin group and diet group, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in fasting plasma glucose during OGTT between the groups (P = 0.069), while plasma glucose at two hours was 161.1 ± 6.8 mg/dL in the insulin group and 145.1 ± 3.7 mg/dL in the diet group (P = 0.027). At the time of diagnosis, HbA1c values were significantly higher in the insulin group compared to the diet group (5.3 ± 0.1 vs. 4.9 ± 0.1; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in FBG and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance values between the groups (P = 0.908, P = 0.073).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results suggest that age, family history of diabetes, body weight before pregnancy, FBG, and HbA1c values are predictors for the necessity of insulin treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"25-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4137/CMWH.S31564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/CMWH.S31564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨治疗妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的预测性风险因素:根据世界卫生组织的标准,共纳入 256 名在怀孕 24-28 周期间接受 75 克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的孕妇。记录了患者的人口统计学特征,包括年龄、胎次、糖尿病家族史、孕前体重和确诊 GDM 时的体重。评估了确诊时的空腹胰岛素和血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)值。根据美国糖尿病协会的建议,将患者分为两组:需要胰岛素治疗的患者(胰岛素组,89 人)和孕期接受饮食治疗的患者(饮食组,167 人):共有 34.76% 的 GDM 孕妇需要接受胰岛素治疗。这些患者的平均年龄明显高于饮食组(34.9 ± 0.6 岁 vs. 31.9 ± 0.6 岁;P = 0.004)。胰岛素组患者怀孕前的体重指数也明显高于节食组(32 ± 0.9 kg/m(2) vs. 29 ± 0.7 kg/m(2); P = 0.004)。胰岛素组和饮食组在 OGTT 期间的空腹血糖(FBG)分别为 105.6 ± 2.1 mg/dL 和 96.7 ± 1.1 mg/dL(P < 0.001)。两组患者在 OGTT 期间的空腹血浆葡萄糖无明显差异(P = 0.069),而两小时后的血浆葡萄糖在胰岛素组为 161.1 ± 6.8 mg/dL,在饮食组为 145.1 ± 3.7 mg/dL(P = 0.027)。诊断时,胰岛素组的 HbA1c 值明显高于饮食组(5.3 ± 0.1 vs. 4.9 ± 0.1;P = 0.001)。两组间的 FBG 和稳态模型评估-胰岛素抵抗值无明显差异(P = 0.908,P = 0.073):我们的研究结果表明,年龄、糖尿病家族史、妊娠前体重、FBG 和 HbA1c 值是胰岛素治疗必要性的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive Risk Factors in the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Objective: This study aims to investigate predictive risk factors in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Patients and methods: A total of 256 pregnant women who underwent 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during 24-28 weeks of pregnancy were included according to the World Health Organization criteria. Demographic characteristics of the patients, including age, parity, family history of diabetes, body weight before pregnancy, and body weight at the diagnosis of GDM, were recorded. Fasting insulin and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values at the time of diagnosis were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: those requiring insulin treatment (insulin group, n = 89) and those receiving diet therapy (diet group, n = 167) during pregnancy according to the American Diabetes Association recommendations.

Results: A total of 34.76% of the pregnant women with GDM required insulin treatment. The mean age of these patients was significantly higher compared to the diet group (34.9 ± 0.6 years vs. 31.9 ± 0.6 years; P = 0.004). Body mass index before pregnancy was also significantly higher in the insulin group than that in the diet group (32 ± 0.9 kg/m(2) vs. 29 ± 0.7 kg/m(2); P = 0.004). Fasting blood glucose (FBG) during OGTT was 105.6 ± 2.1 mg/dL and 96.7 ± 1.1 mg/dL in the insulin group and diet group, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in fasting plasma glucose during OGTT between the groups (P = 0.069), while plasma glucose at two hours was 161.1 ± 6.8 mg/dL in the insulin group and 145.1 ± 3.7 mg/dL in the diet group (P = 0.027). At the time of diagnosis, HbA1c values were significantly higher in the insulin group compared to the diet group (5.3 ± 0.1 vs. 4.9 ± 0.1; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in FBG and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance values between the groups (P = 0.908, P = 0.073).

Conclusion: Our study results suggest that age, family history of diabetes, body weight before pregnancy, FBG, and HbA1c values are predictors for the necessity of insulin treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Associated With Development of Transient Low Back Pain During Prolonged Standing? A Protocol. The Impact of Preconceptional Multiple-Micronutrient Supplementation on Female Fertility. Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures. Structural Racism and Severe Maternal Morbidity in New York State A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin-A in the Management of Dysfunctional Voiding in Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1