前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与放射治疗的生化复发比较。

Korean Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2015-10-01 Epub Date: 2015-10-02 DOI:10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.703
Dong Soo Kim, Seung Hyun Jeon, Sung-Goo Chang, Sang Hyub Lee
{"title":"前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与放射治疗的生化复发比较。","authors":"Dong Soo Kim,&nbsp;Seung Hyun Jeon,&nbsp;Sung-Goo Chang,&nbsp;Sang Hyub Lee","doi":"10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RP or RT as primary definitive treatment from 2007 were enrolled for this study. They were divided into two groups; the low-intermediate risk group and the high risk group according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We compared differences such as age, prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, follow-up duration, clinical T staging, and BCR. Their BCR-free survival rates were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 165 patients were enrolled. There were 115 patients in the low-intermediate risk. Among them, 88 received RP and 27 underwent RT. BCR occurred in 9 of the RP patients (10.2%) and 3 of the RT patients (11.1%). For the high risk group, 50 patients were included. RP was performed in 25 patients and RT in 25 patients. BCR was observed in 4 of the RP patients (16%) and 12 of the RT patients (48%). There were no differences in BCR-free survival for the low-intermediate group (p=0.765). For the high risk group, the RP group had a higher BCR free survival rate (p=0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No difference of BCR and BCR-free survival was seen in the low-intermediate risk group but lower BCR and better BCR-free survival were observed for patients that received RP in the high risk group. RP should be a more strongly considered option when deciding the treatment method for selected high risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17819,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Urology","volume":"56 10","pages":"703-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.703","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Soo Kim,&nbsp;Seung Hyun Jeon,&nbsp;Sung-Goo Chang,&nbsp;Sang Hyub Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RP or RT as primary definitive treatment from 2007 were enrolled for this study. They were divided into two groups; the low-intermediate risk group and the high risk group according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We compared differences such as age, prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, follow-up duration, clinical T staging, and BCR. Their BCR-free survival rates were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 165 patients were enrolled. There were 115 patients in the low-intermediate risk. Among them, 88 received RP and 27 underwent RT. BCR occurred in 9 of the RP patients (10.2%) and 3 of the RT patients (11.1%). For the high risk group, 50 patients were included. RP was performed in 25 patients and RT in 25 patients. BCR was observed in 4 of the RP patients (16%) and 12 of the RT patients (48%). There were no differences in BCR-free survival for the low-intermediate group (p=0.765). For the high risk group, the RP group had a higher BCR free survival rate (p=0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No difference of BCR and BCR-free survival was seen in the low-intermediate risk group but lower BCR and better BCR-free survival were observed for patients that received RP in the high risk group. RP should be a more strongly considered option when deciding the treatment method for selected high risk patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"56 10\",\"pages\":\"703-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.703\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/10/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:探讨前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术(RP)与放射治疗(RT)的生化复发率(BCR)。材料和方法:本研究纳入了2007年以来接受RP或RT作为主要最终治疗的患者。他们被分为两组;中低风险组和高风险组根据国家综合癌症网络指南我们比较了年龄、前列腺特异性抗原、Gleason评分、随访时间、临床T分期和BCR等差异。分析各组无bcr生存率。结果:共纳入165例患者。115例患者为中低危。其中88例接受RP治疗,27例接受RT治疗。RP患者中有9例(10.2%)发生BCR, RT患者中有3例(11.1%)发生BCR。对于高风险组,纳入了50例患者。25例患者行RP, 25例患者行RT。4例RP患者(16%)和12例RT患者(48%)出现BCR。低中级组无bcr生存率无差异(p=0.765)。对于高危组,RP组无BCR生存率更高(p=0.032)。结论:中低危组患者BCR和无BCR生存期无差异,高危组患者接受RP后BCR降低,无BCR生存期提高。在为选定的高风险患者决定治疗方法时,RP应该是一个更强烈考虑的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy.

Purpose: We evaluated the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT).

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent RP or RT as primary definitive treatment from 2007 were enrolled for this study. They were divided into two groups; the low-intermediate risk group and the high risk group according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We compared differences such as age, prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, follow-up duration, clinical T staging, and BCR. Their BCR-free survival rates were analyzed.

Results: A total of 165 patients were enrolled. There were 115 patients in the low-intermediate risk. Among them, 88 received RP and 27 underwent RT. BCR occurred in 9 of the RP patients (10.2%) and 3 of the RT patients (11.1%). For the high risk group, 50 patients were included. RP was performed in 25 patients and RT in 25 patients. BCR was observed in 4 of the RP patients (16%) and 12 of the RT patients (48%). There were no differences in BCR-free survival for the low-intermediate group (p=0.765). For the high risk group, the RP group had a higher BCR free survival rate (p=0.032).

Conclusions: No difference of BCR and BCR-free survival was seen in the low-intermediate risk group but lower BCR and better BCR-free survival were observed for patients that received RP in the high risk group. RP should be a more strongly considered option when deciding the treatment method for selected high risk patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor: Impact of metabolic syndrome on response to medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia The authors reply: Impact of metabolic syndrome on response to medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia Semen parameters from 2002 to 2013 in Korea young population: A preliminary report Simultaneous treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and stress urinary incontinence by using transobturator four arms polypropylene mesh Influence of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition on simple renal cysts in patients receiving bevacizumab-based chemotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1