mRNA基因表达比定量的国际可比性研究:CCQM-P103.1

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Pub Date : 2016-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bdq.2016.05.003
Alison S. Devonshire , Rebecca Sanders , Alexandra S. Whale , Gavin J. Nixon , Simon Cowen , Stephen L.R. Ellison , Helen Parkes , P. Scott Pine , Marc Salit , Jennifer McDaniel , Sarah Munro , Steve Lund , Satoko Matsukura , Yuji Sekiguchi , Mamoru Kawaharasaki , José Mauro Granjeiro , Priscila Falagan-Lotsch , Antonio Marcos Saraiva , Paulo Couto , Inchul Yang , Carole A. Foy
{"title":"mRNA基因表达比定量的国际可比性研究:CCQM-P103.1","authors":"Alison S. Devonshire ,&nbsp;Rebecca Sanders ,&nbsp;Alexandra S. Whale ,&nbsp;Gavin J. Nixon ,&nbsp;Simon Cowen ,&nbsp;Stephen L.R. Ellison ,&nbsp;Helen Parkes ,&nbsp;P. Scott Pine ,&nbsp;Marc Salit ,&nbsp;Jennifer McDaniel ,&nbsp;Sarah Munro ,&nbsp;Steve Lund ,&nbsp;Satoko Matsukura ,&nbsp;Yuji Sekiguchi ,&nbsp;Mamoru Kawaharasaki ,&nbsp;José Mauro Granjeiro ,&nbsp;Priscila Falagan-Lotsch ,&nbsp;Antonio Marcos Saraiva ,&nbsp;Paulo Couto ,&nbsp;Inchul Yang ,&nbsp;Carole A. Foy","doi":"10.1016/j.bdq.2016.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Measurement of RNA can be used to study and monitor a range of infectious and non-communicable diseases, with profiling of multiple gene expression mRNA transcripts being increasingly applied to cancer stratification and prognosis. An international comparison study (Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM)-P103.1) was performed in order to evaluate the comparability of measurements of RNA copy number ratio for multiple gene targets between two samples. Six exogenous synthetic targets comprising of External RNA Control Consortium (ERCC) standards were measured alongside transcripts for three endogenous gene targets present in the background of human cell line RNA. The study was carried out under the auspices of the Nucleic Acids (formerly Bioanalysis) Working Group of the CCQM. It was coordinated by LGC (United Kingdom) with the support of National Institute of Standards and Technology (USA) and results were submitted from thirteen National Metrology Institutes and Designated Institutes. The majority of laboratories performed RNA measurements using RT-qPCR, with datasets also being submitted by two laboratories based on reverse transcription digital polymerase chain reaction and one laboratory using a next-generation sequencing method. In RT-qPCR analysis, the RNA copy number ratios between the two samples were quantified using either a standard curve or a relative quantification approach. In general, good agreement was observed between the reported results of ERCC RNA copy number ratio measurements. Measurements of the RNA copy number ratios for endogenous genes between the two samples were also consistent between the majority of laboratories. Some differences in the reported values and confidence intervals (‘measurement uncertainties’) were noted which may be attributable to choice of measurement method or quantification approach. This highlights the need for standardised practices for the calculation of fold change ratios and uncertainties in the area of gene expression profiling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38073,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 15-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bdq.2016.05.003","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An international comparability study on quantification of mRNA gene expression ratios: CCQM-P103.1\",\"authors\":\"Alison S. Devonshire ,&nbsp;Rebecca Sanders ,&nbsp;Alexandra S. Whale ,&nbsp;Gavin J. Nixon ,&nbsp;Simon Cowen ,&nbsp;Stephen L.R. Ellison ,&nbsp;Helen Parkes ,&nbsp;P. Scott Pine ,&nbsp;Marc Salit ,&nbsp;Jennifer McDaniel ,&nbsp;Sarah Munro ,&nbsp;Steve Lund ,&nbsp;Satoko Matsukura ,&nbsp;Yuji Sekiguchi ,&nbsp;Mamoru Kawaharasaki ,&nbsp;José Mauro Granjeiro ,&nbsp;Priscila Falagan-Lotsch ,&nbsp;Antonio Marcos Saraiva ,&nbsp;Paulo Couto ,&nbsp;Inchul Yang ,&nbsp;Carole A. Foy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bdq.2016.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Measurement of RNA can be used to study and monitor a range of infectious and non-communicable diseases, with profiling of multiple gene expression mRNA transcripts being increasingly applied to cancer stratification and prognosis. An international comparison study (Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM)-P103.1) was performed in order to evaluate the comparability of measurements of RNA copy number ratio for multiple gene targets between two samples. Six exogenous synthetic targets comprising of External RNA Control Consortium (ERCC) standards were measured alongside transcripts for three endogenous gene targets present in the background of human cell line RNA. The study was carried out under the auspices of the Nucleic Acids (formerly Bioanalysis) Working Group of the CCQM. It was coordinated by LGC (United Kingdom) with the support of National Institute of Standards and Technology (USA) and results were submitted from thirteen National Metrology Institutes and Designated Institutes. The majority of laboratories performed RNA measurements using RT-qPCR, with datasets also being submitted by two laboratories based on reverse transcription digital polymerase chain reaction and one laboratory using a next-generation sequencing method. In RT-qPCR analysis, the RNA copy number ratios between the two samples were quantified using either a standard curve or a relative quantification approach. In general, good agreement was observed between the reported results of ERCC RNA copy number ratio measurements. Measurements of the RNA copy number ratios for endogenous genes between the two samples were also consistent between the majority of laboratories. Some differences in the reported values and confidence intervals (‘measurement uncertainties’) were noted which may be attributable to choice of measurement method or quantification approach. This highlights the need for standardised practices for the calculation of fold change ratios and uncertainties in the area of gene expression profiling.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 15-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bdq.2016.05.003\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214753516300109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214753516300109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

RNA的测量可用于研究和监测一系列传染性和非传染性疾病,多基因表达mRNA转录物的谱分析越来越多地应用于癌症分层和预后。为了评估两种样品之间多基因靶点RNA拷贝数比测量的可比性,进行了一项国际比较研究(物质量咨询委员会(CCQM)-P103.1)。6个外源性合成靶点包括外部RNA控制联盟(ERCC)标准,与人类细胞系RNA背景中存在的3个内源性基因靶点的转录本一起进行了测量。这项研究是在CCQM的核酸(以前的生物分析)工作组的主持下进行的。它由英国LGC协调,并得到美国国家标准与技术研究院的支持,13个国家计量研究所和指定研究所提交了结果。大多数实验室使用RT-qPCR进行RNA测量,两个基于逆转录数字聚合酶链反应的实验室和一个使用下一代测序方法的实验室也提交了数据集。在RT-qPCR分析中,使用标准曲线或相对定量方法定量两个样本之间的RNA拷贝数比率。总的来说,在ERCC RNA拷贝数比测量的报告结果之间观察到良好的一致性。在大多数实验室中,两个样本之间内源基因的RNA拷贝数比率的测量结果也一致。报告值和置信区间(“测量不确定性”)的一些差异被注意到,这可能归因于测量方法或量化方法的选择。这突出了在基因表达谱领域计算折叠变化比和不确定性的标准化实践的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An international comparability study on quantification of mRNA gene expression ratios: CCQM-P103.1

Measurement of RNA can be used to study and monitor a range of infectious and non-communicable diseases, with profiling of multiple gene expression mRNA transcripts being increasingly applied to cancer stratification and prognosis. An international comparison study (Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM)-P103.1) was performed in order to evaluate the comparability of measurements of RNA copy number ratio for multiple gene targets between two samples. Six exogenous synthetic targets comprising of External RNA Control Consortium (ERCC) standards were measured alongside transcripts for three endogenous gene targets present in the background of human cell line RNA. The study was carried out under the auspices of the Nucleic Acids (formerly Bioanalysis) Working Group of the CCQM. It was coordinated by LGC (United Kingdom) with the support of National Institute of Standards and Technology (USA) and results were submitted from thirteen National Metrology Institutes and Designated Institutes. The majority of laboratories performed RNA measurements using RT-qPCR, with datasets also being submitted by two laboratories based on reverse transcription digital polymerase chain reaction and one laboratory using a next-generation sequencing method. In RT-qPCR analysis, the RNA copy number ratios between the two samples were quantified using either a standard curve or a relative quantification approach. In general, good agreement was observed between the reported results of ERCC RNA copy number ratio measurements. Measurements of the RNA copy number ratios for endogenous genes between the two samples were also consistent between the majority of laboratories. Some differences in the reported values and confidence intervals (‘measurement uncertainties’) were noted which may be attributable to choice of measurement method or quantification approach. This highlights the need for standardised practices for the calculation of fold change ratios and uncertainties in the area of gene expression profiling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Publisher's Note Establishing essential quality criteria for the validation of circular RNAs as biomarkers qPCR data analysis: Better results through iconoclasm Considerations and quality controls when analyzing cell-free tumor DNA Next-generation sequencing of HIV-1 single genome amplicons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1