[生物膜对伤口愈合的影响及其在伤口中识别的方法]。

Q4 Medicine Acta Medica Croatica Pub Date : 2016-03-01
Jasenka Skrlin
{"title":"[生物膜对伤口愈合的影响及其在伤口中识别的方法]。","authors":"Jasenka Skrlin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The skin microbiome is the aggregate of microorganisms that reside on the surface and in deep layers of the skin. Skin is colonized by bacteria, fungi, viruses and mites, maintaining a balance. Disruption in the ecosystem results in skin infections. Chronic wounds in diabetics, elderly and immobile individuals are at risk of skin organisms to invade and become pathogenic upon breach of the skin barrier. The bacteria of the skin microbiome may contribute to delayed healing and persistent inflammation. Staphylococcus epidermidis is an invasive skin organism that causes infection, i.e. hospital acquired infection (HAl) on medical devices and form biofilm. At the most basic level, biofilm can be described as bacteria embedded in a thick, slimy barrier of sugars and proteins. The biofilm barrier protects the microorganisms from external threats. Biofilms provide a reservoir of potentially infectious microorganisms that are resistant to antimicrobial agents, and their importance in the failure of medical devices and chronic inflammatory condition is increasingly being recognized. Particular research interest exists in the association of biofilms with wound infection and non-healing, i.e. chronic wounds. There is now strong evidence that biofilm is present in the majority of chronic wounds. Specialized microscopic techniques used since 2008 have allowed several research groups to demonstrate that 60% to 90% of chronic wounds have biofilm versus only 6% of acute wounds. While many studies confirm that chronic wounds often contain a polymicrobial flora, controversy remains with regard to whether these organisms directly contribute to non-healing. It seems most likely that individual bacteria themselves are not directly responsible for non-healing wounds. Rather, there is direct correlation between the presence of four or more distinct bacterial species in a wound and non-healing, suggesting that mixed microbial populations are the cause of pathology. The most reliable method to confirm the presence of a biofilm is specialized microscopy, e.g., bright-field, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Surface wound cultures underestimate total wound microbiota--misleading. Histological staining of deep debrided tissue shows evidence of biofilms. Now it is recognized that the majority of microbial species in chronic wounds are anaerobic bacteria (deep swabbing techniques yield similar findings to biopsies) if samples are processed within two hours. Traditional (wound culture method) cultures have limitations because all microbes (the organisms within the biofilm) cannot be isolated in culture or cannot be detected. Therefore, the most effective methods are molecular</p>","PeriodicalId":35756,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Croatica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[IMPACT OF BIOFILM ON HEALING AND A METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING IT IN THE WOUND].\",\"authors\":\"Jasenka Skrlin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The skin microbiome is the aggregate of microorganisms that reside on the surface and in deep layers of the skin. Skin is colonized by bacteria, fungi, viruses and mites, maintaining a balance. Disruption in the ecosystem results in skin infections. Chronic wounds in diabetics, elderly and immobile individuals are at risk of skin organisms to invade and become pathogenic upon breach of the skin barrier. The bacteria of the skin microbiome may contribute to delayed healing and persistent inflammation. Staphylococcus epidermidis is an invasive skin organism that causes infection, i.e. hospital acquired infection (HAl) on medical devices and form biofilm. At the most basic level, biofilm can be described as bacteria embedded in a thick, slimy barrier of sugars and proteins. The biofilm barrier protects the microorganisms from external threats. Biofilms provide a reservoir of potentially infectious microorganisms that are resistant to antimicrobial agents, and their importance in the failure of medical devices and chronic inflammatory condition is increasingly being recognized. Particular research interest exists in the association of biofilms with wound infection and non-healing, i.e. chronic wounds. There is now strong evidence that biofilm is present in the majority of chronic wounds. Specialized microscopic techniques used since 2008 have allowed several research groups to demonstrate that 60% to 90% of chronic wounds have biofilm versus only 6% of acute wounds. While many studies confirm that chronic wounds often contain a polymicrobial flora, controversy remains with regard to whether these organisms directly contribute to non-healing. It seems most likely that individual bacteria themselves are not directly responsible for non-healing wounds. Rather, there is direct correlation between the presence of four or more distinct bacterial species in a wound and non-healing, suggesting that mixed microbial populations are the cause of pathology. The most reliable method to confirm the presence of a biofilm is specialized microscopy, e.g., bright-field, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Surface wound cultures underestimate total wound microbiota--misleading. Histological staining of deep debrided tissue shows evidence of biofilms. Now it is recognized that the majority of microbial species in chronic wounds are anaerobic bacteria (deep swabbing techniques yield similar findings to biopsies) if samples are processed within two hours. Traditional (wound culture method) cultures have limitations because all microbes (the organisms within the biofilm) cannot be isolated in culture or cannot be detected. Therefore, the most effective methods are molecular</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Medica Croatica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Medica Croatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

皮肤微生物群是居住在皮肤表层和深层的微生物的集合。皮肤是细菌,真菌,病毒和螨虫的殖民地,保持平衡。生态系统的破坏会导致皮肤感染。糖尿病患者、老年人和行动不便的人的慢性伤口有皮肤生物侵入的危险,一旦皮肤屏障被破坏,就会变成致病性的。皮肤微生物群中的细菌可能导致愈合延迟和持续炎症。表皮葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus epidermidis)是一种侵袭性皮肤生物,可引起医疗器械感染,即医院获得性感染(hospital acquired infection, HAl)并形成生物膜。在最基本的层面上,生物膜可以被描述为嵌在厚厚的、粘稠的糖和蛋白质屏障中的细菌。生物膜屏障保护微生物免受外界威胁。生物膜提供了对抗菌剂具有耐药性的潜在感染性微生物的储存库,它们在医疗器械失效和慢性炎症状况中的重要性日益得到认识。特别的研究兴趣存在于生物膜与伤口感染和不愈合的关系,即慢性伤口。现在有强有力的证据表明,生物膜存在于大多数慢性伤口中。自2008年以来,一些研究小组使用了专门的显微镜技术,证明60%至90%的慢性伤口有生物膜,而急性伤口只有6%。虽然许多研究证实慢性伤口通常含有多微生物菌群,但关于这些微生物是否直接导致不愈合仍存在争议。很可能单个细菌本身并不是造成伤口无法愈合的直接原因。相反,在伤口中存在四种或四种以上不同的细菌种类与不愈合之间存在直接关联,这表明混合的微生物种群是病理的原因。确认生物膜存在的最可靠方法是专门的显微镜,例如,亮场、荧光原位杂交(FISH)和环境扫描电子显微镜(ESEM)。表面伤口培养低估了伤口菌群总数——误导。深层清除组织的组织学染色显示生物膜的证据。现在人们认识到,如果在两小时内处理样本,慢性伤口中的大多数微生物物种是厌氧菌(深度拭子技术产生的结果与活组织检查相似)。传统的(伤口培养法)培养有局限性,因为所有的微生物(生物膜内的有机体)不能在培养中分离或无法检测到。因此,最有效的方法是分子方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[IMPACT OF BIOFILM ON HEALING AND A METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING IT IN THE WOUND].

The skin microbiome is the aggregate of microorganisms that reside on the surface and in deep layers of the skin. Skin is colonized by bacteria, fungi, viruses and mites, maintaining a balance. Disruption in the ecosystem results in skin infections. Chronic wounds in diabetics, elderly and immobile individuals are at risk of skin organisms to invade and become pathogenic upon breach of the skin barrier. The bacteria of the skin microbiome may contribute to delayed healing and persistent inflammation. Staphylococcus epidermidis is an invasive skin organism that causes infection, i.e. hospital acquired infection (HAl) on medical devices and form biofilm. At the most basic level, biofilm can be described as bacteria embedded in a thick, slimy barrier of sugars and proteins. The biofilm barrier protects the microorganisms from external threats. Biofilms provide a reservoir of potentially infectious microorganisms that are resistant to antimicrobial agents, and their importance in the failure of medical devices and chronic inflammatory condition is increasingly being recognized. Particular research interest exists in the association of biofilms with wound infection and non-healing, i.e. chronic wounds. There is now strong evidence that biofilm is present in the majority of chronic wounds. Specialized microscopic techniques used since 2008 have allowed several research groups to demonstrate that 60% to 90% of chronic wounds have biofilm versus only 6% of acute wounds. While many studies confirm that chronic wounds often contain a polymicrobial flora, controversy remains with regard to whether these organisms directly contribute to non-healing. It seems most likely that individual bacteria themselves are not directly responsible for non-healing wounds. Rather, there is direct correlation between the presence of four or more distinct bacterial species in a wound and non-healing, suggesting that mixed microbial populations are the cause of pathology. The most reliable method to confirm the presence of a biofilm is specialized microscopy, e.g., bright-field, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Surface wound cultures underestimate total wound microbiota--misleading. Histological staining of deep debrided tissue shows evidence of biofilms. Now it is recognized that the majority of microbial species in chronic wounds are anaerobic bacteria (deep swabbing techniques yield similar findings to biopsies) if samples are processed within two hours. Traditional (wound culture method) cultures have limitations because all microbes (the organisms within the biofilm) cannot be isolated in culture or cannot be detected. Therefore, the most effective methods are molecular

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medica Croatica
Acta Medica Croatica Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACTA MEDICA CROATICA publishes original contributions to medical sciences, that have not been previously published. All manuscripts should be written in English.
期刊最新文献
[URATE AS A POTENTIAL RISK FACTOR OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND RENAL DISEASES]. [ADRENOCORTICAL CARCINOMA]. [GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE – HOW TO CHOOSE HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENT]? [DIET CHARACTERISTICS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE]. [CARDIORENAL SYNDROME: CLINICAL FEATURES, EARLY DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT AT FAMILY MEDICINE].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1