卵巢癌蛋白谱的免疫组织化学鉴定潜在的靶标途径。

Gynecologic oncology research and practice Pub Date : 2014-09-30 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1186/2053-6844-1-4
Cassandra D Foss, Heather J Dalton, Bradley J Monk, Dana M Chase, John H Farley
{"title":"卵巢癌蛋白谱的免疫组织化学鉴定潜在的靶标途径。","authors":"Cassandra D Foss,&nbsp;Heather J Dalton,&nbsp;Bradley J Monk,&nbsp;Dana M Chase,&nbsp;John H Farley","doi":"10.1186/2053-6844-1-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine the protein expression profile (PEP) of primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients in order to predict therapeutic targets for chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tissue samples were submitted for PEP in two formats, including formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fresh frozen tissue for oligonucleotide microarray (MA) gene expression assays. Specimens were analyzed for 18 protein markers and 88 MA genes. A series of Generalized Linear Models (GLM) was used to predict the proportion of positive results by histology for each biomarker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and twenty-eight specimens were analyzed for IHC and 67 specimens for MA analysis. The majority of specimens, 82%, were serous histology and 35.3% of specimens were poorly differentiated. Sixty percent of specimens were advanced stage, 62% were from a primary diagnosis, and 53% were obtained from a metastatic site. BCRP, ER, MGMT, and RRM1 proteins were overexpressed in 85%, 47%, 93%, and 47% of serous carcinomas, respectively. The MGMT and RRM1 biomarkers were significantly overexpressed in serous (p < .001) and endometrioid (p = .01) histologies when compared to clear cell histology. MGMT was significantly elevated in 93% of serous and endometrioid samples, compared to 62% of samples with clear cell histology. Those proteins most often underexpressed included Her2/neu, SPARC, and c-kit, seen in less than 1%, 4%, and 5% of specimens, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEP is a reliable and effective way of analyzing ovarian cancer specimens. PEP target identification does not appear to vary significantly with site evaluated, ovarian or other abdominal pelvic tissue, or primary versus recurrent disease. Variability in the expression of drug targets, including BCRP, ER, MGMT, and RRM1 could impact decision making pertaining to which therapeutic strategies carry the best chances for controlling disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":91487,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology research and practice","volume":"1 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2053-6844-1-4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protein profiling of ovarian cancers by immunohistochemistry to identify potential target pathways.\",\"authors\":\"Cassandra D Foss,&nbsp;Heather J Dalton,&nbsp;Bradley J Monk,&nbsp;Dana M Chase,&nbsp;John H Farley\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/2053-6844-1-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine the protein expression profile (PEP) of primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients in order to predict therapeutic targets for chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tissue samples were submitted for PEP in two formats, including formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fresh frozen tissue for oligonucleotide microarray (MA) gene expression assays. Specimens were analyzed for 18 protein markers and 88 MA genes. A series of Generalized Linear Models (GLM) was used to predict the proportion of positive results by histology for each biomarker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and twenty-eight specimens were analyzed for IHC and 67 specimens for MA analysis. The majority of specimens, 82%, were serous histology and 35.3% of specimens were poorly differentiated. Sixty percent of specimens were advanced stage, 62% were from a primary diagnosis, and 53% were obtained from a metastatic site. BCRP, ER, MGMT, and RRM1 proteins were overexpressed in 85%, 47%, 93%, and 47% of serous carcinomas, respectively. The MGMT and RRM1 biomarkers were significantly overexpressed in serous (p < .001) and endometrioid (p = .01) histologies when compared to clear cell histology. MGMT was significantly elevated in 93% of serous and endometrioid samples, compared to 62% of samples with clear cell histology. Those proteins most often underexpressed included Her2/neu, SPARC, and c-kit, seen in less than 1%, 4%, and 5% of specimens, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEP is a reliable and effective way of analyzing ovarian cancer specimens. PEP target identification does not appear to vary significantly with site evaluated, ovarian or other abdominal pelvic tissue, or primary versus recurrent disease. Variability in the expression of drug targets, including BCRP, ER, MGMT, and RRM1 could impact decision making pertaining to which therapeutic strategies carry the best chances for controlling disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2053-6844-1-4\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/2053-6844-1-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2053-6844-1-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:测定原发性和复发性卵巢癌患者的蛋白表达谱(PEP),以预测化疗的治疗靶点。方法:组织样品以两种格式提交PEP,包括福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织用于免疫组织化学(IHC)和新鲜冷冻组织用于寡核苷酸微阵列(MA)基因表达测定。对标本进行18个蛋白标记和88个MA基因的分析。采用一系列广义线性模型(GLM)来预测每种生物标志物的组织学阳性结果比例。结果:IHC分析428例,MA分析67例。绝大多数标本(82%)为浆液组织学,35.3%标本为低分化。60%的标本为晚期,62%来自原发性诊断,53%来自转移部位。BCRP、ER、MGMT和RRM1蛋白分别在85%、47%、93%和47%的浆液性癌中过表达。结论:PEP是一种可靠、有效的分析卵巢癌标本的方法。PEP靶点的鉴定似乎与评估部位、卵巢或其他腹部盆腔组织或原发性与复发性疾病没有显著差异。包括BCRP、ER、MGMT和RRM1在内的药物靶点表达的变异性可能影响与哪种治疗策略最有可能控制疾病有关的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protein profiling of ovarian cancers by immunohistochemistry to identify potential target pathways.

Background: To determine the protein expression profile (PEP) of primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients in order to predict therapeutic targets for chemotherapy.

Methods: Tissue samples were submitted for PEP in two formats, including formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fresh frozen tissue for oligonucleotide microarray (MA) gene expression assays. Specimens were analyzed for 18 protein markers and 88 MA genes. A series of Generalized Linear Models (GLM) was used to predict the proportion of positive results by histology for each biomarker.

Results: Four hundred and twenty-eight specimens were analyzed for IHC and 67 specimens for MA analysis. The majority of specimens, 82%, were serous histology and 35.3% of specimens were poorly differentiated. Sixty percent of specimens were advanced stage, 62% were from a primary diagnosis, and 53% were obtained from a metastatic site. BCRP, ER, MGMT, and RRM1 proteins were overexpressed in 85%, 47%, 93%, and 47% of serous carcinomas, respectively. The MGMT and RRM1 biomarkers were significantly overexpressed in serous (p < .001) and endometrioid (p = .01) histologies when compared to clear cell histology. MGMT was significantly elevated in 93% of serous and endometrioid samples, compared to 62% of samples with clear cell histology. Those proteins most often underexpressed included Her2/neu, SPARC, and c-kit, seen in less than 1%, 4%, and 5% of specimens, respectively.

Conclusions: PEP is a reliable and effective way of analyzing ovarian cancer specimens. PEP target identification does not appear to vary significantly with site evaluated, ovarian or other abdominal pelvic tissue, or primary versus recurrent disease. Variability in the expression of drug targets, including BCRP, ER, MGMT, and RRM1 could impact decision making pertaining to which therapeutic strategies carry the best chances for controlling disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extra-uterine low grade endometrioid stromal sarcoma arising from ovarian endometriosis: a case report and review of the literature. Preferences of women with epithelial ovarian cancer for aspects of genetic testing. Safety and feasibility of contained uterine morcellation in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. A small molecule inhibitor of the perinucleolar compartment, ML246, attenuates growth and spread of ovarian cancer. Response to pembrolizumab in a heavily treated patient with metastatic ovarian carcinosarcoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1