{"title":"与水或水合物平衡的液态丙烷的水含量测量:新的测量和文献数据的评价","authors":"Abdulla Alassi, Rod Burgass, Antonin Chapoy","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Propane is utilised primarily for industrial sector and domestic applications. However, propane is considered a hydrate former. Thus, it is necessary to establish pressure and temperature conditions that ensure a hydrate-free zone. This requires determining the minimum amount of water required for the formation of hydrates and providing a thermodynamic model capable of determining the water content and predicting pressure and temperature conditions for hydrate dissociation. Consequently this study investigated the water content of liquid propane in equilibrium with liquid water or hydrates at pressures up to 8.274 MPa and temperatures between 211.15 K and 313.15 K. Using three different methods: a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), a silicon oxide-based hygrometer and the new method developed by Burgass et al. (2021). In general, water content measurements determined from the new method and QCM were found to be in good agreement. The fluid phase behaviour of the system (propane + water) was modelled using the simplified Cubic-Plus-Association (sCPA-SRK) and the Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) equation of state combined with the van der Waals classical and non-density-dependent (NDD) mixing rules, respectively. Both models provided similar results, although the sCPA-SRK model used only one adjustable parameter in contrast with the SRK model, which used three adjustable parameters. The experimental measurements from the new method and QCM to the sCPA-SRK and SRK-NDD models presented 4.5% and 4.5% deviation, respectively over temperature range of 276.15–313.15 K. In all cases, the hydrate-forming conditions were modelled using the van der Waals and Platteeuw's solid solution theory. Additionally, the sCPA-SRK + van der Waals and Platteeuw model calculations were compared against hydrate dissociation conditions, using used two adjustable Kihara parameters and showed overall good agreement when compared to data from the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 104732"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Water content measurements for liquid propane in equilibrium with water or hydrates: New measurements & evaluation of literature data\",\"authors\":\"Abdulla Alassi, Rod Burgass, Antonin Chapoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Propane is utilised primarily for industrial sector and domestic applications. However, propane is considered a hydrate former. Thus, it is necessary to establish pressure and temperature conditions that ensure a hydrate-free zone. This requires determining the minimum amount of water required for the formation of hydrates and providing a thermodynamic model capable of determining the water content and predicting pressure and temperature conditions for hydrate dissociation. Consequently this study investigated the water content of liquid propane in equilibrium with liquid water or hydrates at pressures up to 8.274 MPa and temperatures between 211.15 K and 313.15 K. Using three different methods: a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), a silicon oxide-based hygrometer and the new method developed by Burgass et al. (2021). In general, water content measurements determined from the new method and QCM were found to be in good agreement. The fluid phase behaviour of the system (propane + water) was modelled using the simplified Cubic-Plus-Association (sCPA-SRK) and the Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) equation of state combined with the van der Waals classical and non-density-dependent (NDD) mixing rules, respectively. Both models provided similar results, although the sCPA-SRK model used only one adjustable parameter in contrast with the SRK model, which used three adjustable parameters. The experimental measurements from the new method and QCM to the sCPA-SRK and SRK-NDD models presented 4.5% and 4.5% deviation, respectively over temperature range of 276.15–313.15 K. In all cases, the hydrate-forming conditions were modelled using the van der Waals and Platteeuw's solid solution theory. Additionally, the sCPA-SRK + van der Waals and Platteeuw model calculations were compared against hydrate dissociation conditions, using used two adjustable Kihara parameters and showed overall good agreement when compared to data from the literature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104732\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003201\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
丙烷主要用于工业部门和家庭应用。然而,丙烷被认为是一种水合物。因此,有必要建立确保无水合物区域的压力和温度条件。这需要确定水合物形成所需的最小水量,并提供能够确定水含量和预测水合物解离的压力和温度条件的热力学模型。因此,本研究在压力高达8.274 MPa,温度在211.15 ~ 313.15 K之间时,研究了液态丙烷与液态水或水合物平衡时的含水量。使用三种不同的方法:石英晶体微天平(QCM),基于氧化硅的湿度计和Burgass等人(2021)开发的新方法。总的来说,用新方法测定的含水量和QCM测定的含水量是一致的。系统(丙烷+水)的流体相行为分别使用简化的立方+关联(sCPA-SRK)和Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK)状态方程,结合范德华经典和非密度相关(NDD)混合规则进行建模。尽管sCPA-SRK模型只使用了一个可调参数,而SRK模型使用了三个可调参数,但两种模型的结果相似。在276.15 ~ 313.15 K的温度范围内,新方法和QCM与sCPA-SRK和SRK-NDD模型的实验测量值偏差分别为4.5%和4.5%。在所有的情况下,水合物形成的条件是使用范德华和Platteeuw的固溶体理论建模的。此外,sCPA-SRK + van der Waals和Platteeuw模型计算与水合物解离条件进行了比较,使用了两个可调的Kihara参数,与文献数据相比,显示出总体上良好的一致性。
Water content measurements for liquid propane in equilibrium with water or hydrates: New measurements & evaluation of literature data
Propane is utilised primarily for industrial sector and domestic applications. However, propane is considered a hydrate former. Thus, it is necessary to establish pressure and temperature conditions that ensure a hydrate-free zone. This requires determining the minimum amount of water required for the formation of hydrates and providing a thermodynamic model capable of determining the water content and predicting pressure and temperature conditions for hydrate dissociation. Consequently this study investigated the water content of liquid propane in equilibrium with liquid water or hydrates at pressures up to 8.274 MPa and temperatures between 211.15 K and 313.15 K. Using three different methods: a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), a silicon oxide-based hygrometer and the new method developed by Burgass et al. (2021). In general, water content measurements determined from the new method and QCM were found to be in good agreement. The fluid phase behaviour of the system (propane + water) was modelled using the simplified Cubic-Plus-Association (sCPA-SRK) and the Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) equation of state combined with the van der Waals classical and non-density-dependent (NDD) mixing rules, respectively. Both models provided similar results, although the sCPA-SRK model used only one adjustable parameter in contrast with the SRK model, which used three adjustable parameters. The experimental measurements from the new method and QCM to the sCPA-SRK and SRK-NDD models presented 4.5% and 4.5% deviation, respectively over temperature range of 276.15–313.15 K. In all cases, the hydrate-forming conditions were modelled using the van der Waals and Platteeuw's solid solution theory. Additionally, the sCPA-SRK + van der Waals and Platteeuw model calculations were compared against hydrate dissociation conditions, using used two adjustable Kihara parameters and showed overall good agreement when compared to data from the literature.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.