大脑中的多巴胺:假设过量或缺乏与奖励和成瘾有关。

Journal of reward deficiency syndrome Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-10-23 DOI:10.17756/jrds.2015-016
Kenneth Blum, Peter K Thanos, Marlene Oscar-Berman, Marcelo Febo, David Baron, Rajendra D Badgaiyan, Eliot Gardner, Zsolt Demetrovics, Claudia Fahlke, Brett C Haberstick, Kristina Dushaj, Mark S Gold
{"title":"大脑中的多巴胺:假设过量或缺乏与奖励和成瘾有关。","authors":"Kenneth Blum,&nbsp;Peter K Thanos,&nbsp;Marlene Oscar-Berman,&nbsp;Marcelo Febo,&nbsp;David Baron,&nbsp;Rajendra D Badgaiyan,&nbsp;Eliot Gardner,&nbsp;Zsolt Demetrovics,&nbsp;Claudia Fahlke,&nbsp;Brett C Haberstick,&nbsp;Kristina Dushaj,&nbsp;Mark S Gold","doi":"10.17756/jrds.2015-016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently there has been debate concerning the role of brain dopamine in reward and addiction. David Nutt and associates eloquently proposed that dopamine (DA) may be central to psycho stimulant dependence and some what important for alcohol, but not important for opiates, nicotine or even cannabis. Others have also argued that surfeit theories can explain for example cocaine seeking behavior as well as non-substance-related addictive behaviors. It seems prudent to distinguish between what constitutes \"surfeit\" compared to\" deficit\" in terms of short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) brain reward circuitry responsivity. In an attempt to resolve controversy regarding the contributions of mesolimbic DA systems to reward, we review the three main competing explanatory categories: \"liking\", \"learning\", and \"wanting\". They are (a) the hedonic impact -liking reward, (b) the ability to predict rewarding effects-learning and (c) the incentive salience of reward-related stimuli -wanting. In terms of acute effects, most of the evidence seems to favor the \"surfeit theory\". Due to preferential dopamine release at mesolimbic-VTA-caudate-accumbens loci most drugs of abuse and Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) behaviors have been linked to heightened feelings of well-being and hyperdopaminergic states.The \"dopamine hypotheses\" originally thought to be simple, is now believed to be quite complex and involves encoding the set point of hedonic tone, encoding attention, reward expectancy, and incentive motivation. Importantly, Willuhn et al. shows that in a self-administration paradigm, (chronic) excessive use of cocaine is caused by decreased phasic dopamine signaling in the striatum. In terms of chronic addictions, others have shown a blunted responsivity at brain reward sites with food, nicotine, and even gambling behavior. Finally, we are cognizant of the differences in dopaminergic function as addiction progresses and argue that relapse may be tied to dopamine deficiency. Vulnerability to addiction and relapse may be the result of the cumulative effects of dopaminergic and other neurotransmitter genetic variants and elevated stress levels. We therefore propose that dopamine homeostasis may be a preferred goal to combat relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":90909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reward deficiency syndrome","volume":"1 3","pages":"95-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936401/pdf/","citationCount":"100","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dopamine in the Brain: Hypothesizing Surfeit or Deficit Links to Reward and Addiction.\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Blum,&nbsp;Peter K Thanos,&nbsp;Marlene Oscar-Berman,&nbsp;Marcelo Febo,&nbsp;David Baron,&nbsp;Rajendra D Badgaiyan,&nbsp;Eliot Gardner,&nbsp;Zsolt Demetrovics,&nbsp;Claudia Fahlke,&nbsp;Brett C Haberstick,&nbsp;Kristina Dushaj,&nbsp;Mark S Gold\",\"doi\":\"10.17756/jrds.2015-016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recently there has been debate concerning the role of brain dopamine in reward and addiction. David Nutt and associates eloquently proposed that dopamine (DA) may be central to psycho stimulant dependence and some what important for alcohol, but not important for opiates, nicotine or even cannabis. Others have also argued that surfeit theories can explain for example cocaine seeking behavior as well as non-substance-related addictive behaviors. It seems prudent to distinguish between what constitutes \\\"surfeit\\\" compared to\\\" deficit\\\" in terms of short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) brain reward circuitry responsivity. In an attempt to resolve controversy regarding the contributions of mesolimbic DA systems to reward, we review the three main competing explanatory categories: \\\"liking\\\", \\\"learning\\\", and \\\"wanting\\\". They are (a) the hedonic impact -liking reward, (b) the ability to predict rewarding effects-learning and (c) the incentive salience of reward-related stimuli -wanting. In terms of acute effects, most of the evidence seems to favor the \\\"surfeit theory\\\". Due to preferential dopamine release at mesolimbic-VTA-caudate-accumbens loci most drugs of abuse and Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) behaviors have been linked to heightened feelings of well-being and hyperdopaminergic states.The \\\"dopamine hypotheses\\\" originally thought to be simple, is now believed to be quite complex and involves encoding the set point of hedonic tone, encoding attention, reward expectancy, and incentive motivation. Importantly, Willuhn et al. shows that in a self-administration paradigm, (chronic) excessive use of cocaine is caused by decreased phasic dopamine signaling in the striatum. In terms of chronic addictions, others have shown a blunted responsivity at brain reward sites with food, nicotine, and even gambling behavior. Finally, we are cognizant of the differences in dopaminergic function as addiction progresses and argue that relapse may be tied to dopamine deficiency. Vulnerability to addiction and relapse may be the result of the cumulative effects of dopaminergic and other neurotransmitter genetic variants and elevated stress levels. We therefore propose that dopamine homeostasis may be a preferred goal to combat relapse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reward deficiency syndrome\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"95-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"100\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reward deficiency syndrome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17756/jrds.2015-016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reward deficiency syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17756/jrds.2015-016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 100

摘要

最近,关于大脑多巴胺在奖励和成瘾中的作用一直存在争议。David Nutt和他的同事有力地提出,多巴胺(DA)可能是精神刺激物依赖的核心,对酒精也很重要,但对鸦片、尼古丁甚至大麻都不重要。其他人也认为,过量理论可以解释例如可卡因寻求行为以及与物质无关的成瘾行为。从短期(急性)和长期(慢性)大脑奖赏回路反应性的角度来区分什么是“过量”,什么是“不足”,似乎是谨慎的。为了解决关于中边缘数据处理系统对奖励的贡献的争议,我们回顾了三个主要的相互竞争的解释类别:“喜欢”,“学习”和“想要”。它们是(a)享乐影响——喜欢奖励;(b)预测奖励效果的能力——学习;(c)奖励相关刺激的激励显著性——欲望。就急性效应而言,大多数证据似乎都支持“过量理论”。由于多巴胺在中脑- vta -尾状-伏隔座的优先释放,大多数药物滥用和奖励缺乏综合征(RDS)行为与幸福感和高多巴胺能状态的增强有关。“多巴胺假说”最初被认为是简单的,现在被认为是相当复杂的,它涉及到编码快乐基调的设定值,编码注意力,奖励预期和激励动机。重要的是,Willuhn等人表明,在自我给药范式中,(慢性)过量使用可卡因是由纹状体中阶段性多巴胺信号减少引起的。就慢性成瘾而言,其他人在大脑奖励部位对食物、尼古丁甚至赌博行为表现出迟钝的反应。最后,我们认识到随着成瘾的进展,多巴胺能功能的差异,并认为复发可能与多巴胺缺乏有关。成瘾和复发的脆弱性可能是多巴胺能和其他神经递质遗传变异和应激水平升高的累积效应的结果。因此,我们建议多巴胺稳态可能是对抗复发的首选目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dopamine in the Brain: Hypothesizing Surfeit or Deficit Links to Reward and Addiction.

Recently there has been debate concerning the role of brain dopamine in reward and addiction. David Nutt and associates eloquently proposed that dopamine (DA) may be central to psycho stimulant dependence and some what important for alcohol, but not important for opiates, nicotine or even cannabis. Others have also argued that surfeit theories can explain for example cocaine seeking behavior as well as non-substance-related addictive behaviors. It seems prudent to distinguish between what constitutes "surfeit" compared to" deficit" in terms of short-term (acute) and long-term (chronic) brain reward circuitry responsivity. In an attempt to resolve controversy regarding the contributions of mesolimbic DA systems to reward, we review the three main competing explanatory categories: "liking", "learning", and "wanting". They are (a) the hedonic impact -liking reward, (b) the ability to predict rewarding effects-learning and (c) the incentive salience of reward-related stimuli -wanting. In terms of acute effects, most of the evidence seems to favor the "surfeit theory". Due to preferential dopamine release at mesolimbic-VTA-caudate-accumbens loci most drugs of abuse and Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) behaviors have been linked to heightened feelings of well-being and hyperdopaminergic states.The "dopamine hypotheses" originally thought to be simple, is now believed to be quite complex and involves encoding the set point of hedonic tone, encoding attention, reward expectancy, and incentive motivation. Importantly, Willuhn et al. shows that in a self-administration paradigm, (chronic) excessive use of cocaine is caused by decreased phasic dopamine signaling in the striatum. In terms of chronic addictions, others have shown a blunted responsivity at brain reward sites with food, nicotine, and even gambling behavior. Finally, we are cognizant of the differences in dopaminergic function as addiction progresses and argue that relapse may be tied to dopamine deficiency. Vulnerability to addiction and relapse may be the result of the cumulative effects of dopaminergic and other neurotransmitter genetic variants and elevated stress levels. We therefore propose that dopamine homeostasis may be a preferred goal to combat relapse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brain Reward Pathway Dysfunction in Maternal Depression and Addiction: A Present and Future Transgenerational Risk Addiction Treatment in America: After Money or Aftercare? Designer Drugs: A Synthetic Catastrophe NIDA-Drug Addiction Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS) Relapse as a Function of Spirituality/Religiosity. Molecular Genetic Testing in Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS): Facts and Fiction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1