甲状腺癌患者甲状腺切除术后局部淋巴结复发的预测因素。

IF 1.7 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Thyroid Research Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-06-14 DOI:10.1155/2016/4127278
Amirsina Sharifi, Abolfazl Shojaeifard, Ahmadreza Soroush, Mehdi Jafari, Ali Ghorbani Abdehgah, Hossein Mahmoudzade
{"title":"甲状腺癌患者甲状腺切除术后局部淋巴结复发的预测因素。","authors":"Amirsina Sharifi,&nbsp;Abolfazl Shojaeifard,&nbsp;Ahmadreza Soroush,&nbsp;Mehdi Jafari,&nbsp;Ali Ghorbani Abdehgah,&nbsp;Hossein Mahmoudzade","doi":"10.1155/2016/4127278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Regional lymph node recurrence (RLNR) is common in patients with thyroid cancer but clinicopathological predictors are unclear. We aimed to clarify these predictors and identify patients who would benefit from prophylactic lymph node dissection the most. Method. 343 patients with different types of thyroid cancer were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent total thyroidectomy between 2007 and 2013. Results. The median ± interquartile range of patients' age was 40 ± 25 years. 245 (71.4%) patients were female. Regarding the risk of regional lymph node recurrence, we found that male gender, age ≥45 years, non-PTC (i.e., medullary, follicular, and anaplastic types) histopathology, T3 (i.e., tumor size >4 cm in the greatest dimension limited to the thyroid or any tumor with minimal extrathyroid extension), stage IVa, and isolated cervical lymphadenopathy as initial manifestation (ICL) are significant risk factors. T3 (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 156.41, 95% CI [55.72-439.1]) and ICL (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 77.79, 95% CI [31.55-191.81]) were the strongest predictors of regional lymph node recurrence. Conclusion. We found easily achievable risk factors for RLNR in thyroid cancers patients. We suggested that patients with specific clinicopathological features like male gender, age ≥45 years, larger tumor size, and extrathyroidal extension be considered as prophylactic lymphadenectomy candidates. </p>","PeriodicalId":17394,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thyroid Research","volume":"2016 ","pages":"4127278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/4127278","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Regional Lymph Node Recurrence after Initial Thyroidectomy in Patients with Thyroid Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Amirsina Sharifi,&nbsp;Abolfazl Shojaeifard,&nbsp;Ahmadreza Soroush,&nbsp;Mehdi Jafari,&nbsp;Ali Ghorbani Abdehgah,&nbsp;Hossein Mahmoudzade\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2016/4127278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background. Regional lymph node recurrence (RLNR) is common in patients with thyroid cancer but clinicopathological predictors are unclear. We aimed to clarify these predictors and identify patients who would benefit from prophylactic lymph node dissection the most. Method. 343 patients with different types of thyroid cancer were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent total thyroidectomy between 2007 and 2013. Results. The median ± interquartile range of patients' age was 40 ± 25 years. 245 (71.4%) patients were female. Regarding the risk of regional lymph node recurrence, we found that male gender, age ≥45 years, non-PTC (i.e., medullary, follicular, and anaplastic types) histopathology, T3 (i.e., tumor size >4 cm in the greatest dimension limited to the thyroid or any tumor with minimal extrathyroid extension), stage IVa, and isolated cervical lymphadenopathy as initial manifestation (ICL) are significant risk factors. T3 (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 156.41, 95% CI [55.72-439.1]) and ICL (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 77.79, 95% CI [31.55-191.81]) were the strongest predictors of regional lymph node recurrence. Conclusion. We found easily achievable risk factors for RLNR in thyroid cancers patients. We suggested that patients with specific clinicopathological features like male gender, age ≥45 years, larger tumor size, and extrathyroidal extension be considered as prophylactic lymphadenectomy candidates. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thyroid Research\",\"volume\":\"2016 \",\"pages\":\"4127278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/4127278\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thyroid Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4127278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thyroid Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4127278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

背景。局部淋巴结复发(RLNR)在甲状腺癌患者中很常见,但临床病理预测因素尚不清楚。我们的目的是澄清这些预测因素,并确定从预防性淋巴结清扫中获益最多的患者。方法:对343例不同类型甲状腺癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。所有患者均在2007年至2013年间接受了甲状腺全切除术。结果。患者年龄中位数±四分位数范围为40±25岁。女性245例(71.4%)。关于局部淋巴结复发的风险,我们发现男性、年龄≥45岁、非ptc(即髓样、滤泡型和间变性型)组织病理学、T3(即肿瘤尺寸> 4cm,最大局限于甲状腺或任何甲状腺外扩展最小的肿瘤)、IVa期和孤立性宫颈淋巴结病为初始表现(ICL)是重要的危险因素。T3 (p < 0.001);优势比= 156.41,95% CI[55.72 ~ 439.1])和ICL (p < 0.001;优势比= 77.79,95% CI[31.55 ~ 191.81])是区域淋巴结复发的最强预测因子。结论。我们发现了甲状腺癌患者RLNR容易达到的危险因素。我们建议有特定临床病理特征的患者,如男性、年龄≥45岁、肿瘤体积较大、甲状腺外扩张等,可考虑预防性淋巴结切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of Regional Lymph Node Recurrence after Initial Thyroidectomy in Patients with Thyroid Cancer.

Background. Regional lymph node recurrence (RLNR) is common in patients with thyroid cancer but clinicopathological predictors are unclear. We aimed to clarify these predictors and identify patients who would benefit from prophylactic lymph node dissection the most. Method. 343 patients with different types of thyroid cancer were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent total thyroidectomy between 2007 and 2013. Results. The median ± interquartile range of patients' age was 40 ± 25 years. 245 (71.4%) patients were female. Regarding the risk of regional lymph node recurrence, we found that male gender, age ≥45 years, non-PTC (i.e., medullary, follicular, and anaplastic types) histopathology, T3 (i.e., tumor size >4 cm in the greatest dimension limited to the thyroid or any tumor with minimal extrathyroid extension), stage IVa, and isolated cervical lymphadenopathy as initial manifestation (ICL) are significant risk factors. T3 (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 156.41, 95% CI [55.72-439.1]) and ICL (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 77.79, 95% CI [31.55-191.81]) were the strongest predictors of regional lymph node recurrence. Conclusion. We found easily achievable risk factors for RLNR in thyroid cancers patients. We suggested that patients with specific clinicopathological features like male gender, age ≥45 years, larger tumor size, and extrathyroidal extension be considered as prophylactic lymphadenectomy candidates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thyroid Research
Journal of Thyroid Research ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Thyroidectomy for Large-Sized Goiters: Merits of the Axillo-Breast Approach with Gas Insufflation. Occult Central Lymph Node Metastasis in cN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients Undergoing TOETVA Procedure. Hashimoto Thyroiditis beyond Cytology: A Correlation between Cytological, Hormonal, Serological, and Radiological Findings. Bone Turnover in Relation to Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone in Hypothyroid Patients on Thyroid Hormone Substitution Therapy. Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Deep Thyroid Nodule: Is There a Correlation between the Nodule's Depth and Nondiagnostic Results?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1