Vincent Dewitte , Wim Peersman , Lieven Danneels , Katie Bouche , Arne Roets , Barbara Cagnie
{"title":"主观和临床评估标准提示五种临床模式可识别的非特异性颈痛患者。一项针对临床专家的德尔菲调查","authors":"Vincent Dewitte , Wim Peersman , Lieven Danneels , Katie Bouche , Arne Roets , Barbara Cagnie","doi":"10.1016/j.math.2016.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nonspecific neck pain patients form a heterogeneous group with different musculoskeletal impairments. Classifying nonspecific neck pain patients into subgroups based on clinical characteristics might lead to more comprehensive diagnoses and can guide effective management.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To establish consensus among a group of experts regarding the clinical criteria suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’ and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns distinguishable in patients with nonspecific neck pain.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Delphi study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A focus group with 10 academic experts was organized to elaborate on the different dysfunction patterns discernible in neck pain patients. Consecutively, a 3-round online Delphi-survey was designed to obtain consensual symptoms and physical examination findings for the 5 distinct dysfunction patterns resulting from the focus group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 21 musculoskeletal physical therapists from Belgium and the Netherlands experienced in assessing and treating neck pain patients completed the 3-round Delphi-survey. Respectively, 33 (response rate, 100.0%), 27 (81.8%) and 21 (63.6%) respondents replied to rounds 1, 2 and 3. Eighteen ‘articular’, 16 ‘myofascial’, 20 ‘neural’, 18 ‘central’ and 10 ‘sensorimotor control’ clinical indicators reached a predefined ≥80% consensus level.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These indicators suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’, and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns may help clinicians to assess and diagnose patients with nonspecific neck pain. Future validity testing is needed to determine how these criteria may help to improve the outcome of physical therapy interventions in nonspecific neck pain patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49889,"journal":{"name":"Manual Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.math.2016.07.005","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective and clinical assessment criteria suggestive for five clinical patterns discernible in nonspecific neck pain patients. A Delphi-survey of clinical experts\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Dewitte , Wim Peersman , Lieven Danneels , Katie Bouche , Arne Roets , Barbara Cagnie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.math.2016.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nonspecific neck pain patients form a heterogeneous group with different musculoskeletal impairments. Classifying nonspecific neck pain patients into subgroups based on clinical characteristics might lead to more comprehensive diagnoses and can guide effective management.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To establish consensus among a group of experts regarding the clinical criteria suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’ and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns distinguishable in patients with nonspecific neck pain.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Delphi study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A focus group with 10 academic experts was organized to elaborate on the different dysfunction patterns discernible in neck pain patients. Consecutively, a 3-round online Delphi-survey was designed to obtain consensual symptoms and physical examination findings for the 5 distinct dysfunction patterns resulting from the focus group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 21 musculoskeletal physical therapists from Belgium and the Netherlands experienced in assessing and treating neck pain patients completed the 3-round Delphi-survey. Respectively, 33 (response rate, 100.0%), 27 (81.8%) and 21 (63.6%) respondents replied to rounds 1, 2 and 3. Eighteen ‘articular’, 16 ‘myofascial’, 20 ‘neural’, 18 ‘central’ and 10 ‘sensorimotor control’ clinical indicators reached a predefined ≥80% consensus level.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These indicators suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’, and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns may help clinicians to assess and diagnose patients with nonspecific neck pain. Future validity testing is needed to determine how these criteria may help to improve the outcome of physical therapy interventions in nonspecific neck pain patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manual Therapy\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 87-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.math.2016.07.005\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manual Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X16306841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manual Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X16306841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Subjective and clinical assessment criteria suggestive for five clinical patterns discernible in nonspecific neck pain patients. A Delphi-survey of clinical experts
Background
Nonspecific neck pain patients form a heterogeneous group with different musculoskeletal impairments. Classifying nonspecific neck pain patients into subgroups based on clinical characteristics might lead to more comprehensive diagnoses and can guide effective management.
Objective
To establish consensus among a group of experts regarding the clinical criteria suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’ and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns distinguishable in patients with nonspecific neck pain.
Study design
Delphi study.
Methods
A focus group with 10 academic experts was organized to elaborate on the different dysfunction patterns discernible in neck pain patients. Consecutively, a 3-round online Delphi-survey was designed to obtain consensual symptoms and physical examination findings for the 5 distinct dysfunction patterns resulting from the focus group.
Results
A total of 21 musculoskeletal physical therapists from Belgium and the Netherlands experienced in assessing and treating neck pain patients completed the 3-round Delphi-survey. Respectively, 33 (response rate, 100.0%), 27 (81.8%) and 21 (63.6%) respondents replied to rounds 1, 2 and 3. Eighteen ‘articular’, 16 ‘myofascial’, 20 ‘neural’, 18 ‘central’ and 10 ‘sensorimotor control’ clinical indicators reached a predefined ≥80% consensus level.
Conclusion
These indicators suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’, and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns may help clinicians to assess and diagnose patients with nonspecific neck pain. Future validity testing is needed to determine how these criteria may help to improve the outcome of physical therapy interventions in nonspecific neck pain patients.