主观和临床评估标准提示五种临床模式可识别的非特异性颈痛患者。一项针对临床专家的德尔菲调查

Vincent Dewitte , Wim Peersman , Lieven Danneels , Katie Bouche , Arne Roets , Barbara Cagnie
{"title":"主观和临床评估标准提示五种临床模式可识别的非特异性颈痛患者。一项针对临床专家的德尔菲调查","authors":"Vincent Dewitte ,&nbsp;Wim Peersman ,&nbsp;Lieven Danneels ,&nbsp;Katie Bouche ,&nbsp;Arne Roets ,&nbsp;Barbara Cagnie","doi":"10.1016/j.math.2016.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nonspecific neck pain patients form a heterogeneous group with different musculoskeletal impairments. Classifying nonspecific neck pain patients into subgroups based on clinical characteristics might lead to more comprehensive diagnoses and can guide effective management.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To establish consensus among a group of experts regarding the clinical criteria suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’ and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns distinguishable in patients with nonspecific neck pain.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Delphi study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A focus group with 10 academic experts was organized to elaborate on the different dysfunction patterns discernible in neck pain patients. Consecutively, a 3-round online Delphi-survey was designed to obtain consensual symptoms and physical examination findings for the 5 distinct dysfunction patterns resulting from the focus group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 21 musculoskeletal physical therapists from Belgium and the Netherlands experienced in assessing and treating neck pain patients completed the 3-round Delphi-survey. Respectively, 33 (response rate, 100.0%), 27 (81.8%) and 21 (63.6%) respondents replied to rounds 1, 2 and 3. Eighteen ‘articular’, 16 ‘myofascial’, 20 ‘neural’, 18 ‘central’ and 10 ‘sensorimotor control’ clinical indicators reached a predefined ≥80% consensus level.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These indicators suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’, and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns may help clinicians to assess and diagnose patients with nonspecific neck pain. Future validity testing is needed to determine how these criteria may help to improve the outcome of physical therapy interventions in nonspecific neck pain patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49889,"journal":{"name":"Manual Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.math.2016.07.005","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective and clinical assessment criteria suggestive for five clinical patterns discernible in nonspecific neck pain patients. A Delphi-survey of clinical experts\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Dewitte ,&nbsp;Wim Peersman ,&nbsp;Lieven Danneels ,&nbsp;Katie Bouche ,&nbsp;Arne Roets ,&nbsp;Barbara Cagnie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.math.2016.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nonspecific neck pain patients form a heterogeneous group with different musculoskeletal impairments. Classifying nonspecific neck pain patients into subgroups based on clinical characteristics might lead to more comprehensive diagnoses and can guide effective management.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To establish consensus among a group of experts regarding the clinical criteria suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’ and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns distinguishable in patients with nonspecific neck pain.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Delphi study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A focus group with 10 academic experts was organized to elaborate on the different dysfunction patterns discernible in neck pain patients. Consecutively, a 3-round online Delphi-survey was designed to obtain consensual symptoms and physical examination findings for the 5 distinct dysfunction patterns resulting from the focus group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 21 musculoskeletal physical therapists from Belgium and the Netherlands experienced in assessing and treating neck pain patients completed the 3-round Delphi-survey. Respectively, 33 (response rate, 100.0%), 27 (81.8%) and 21 (63.6%) respondents replied to rounds 1, 2 and 3. Eighteen ‘articular’, 16 ‘myofascial’, 20 ‘neural’, 18 ‘central’ and 10 ‘sensorimotor control’ clinical indicators reached a predefined ≥80% consensus level.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These indicators suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’, and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns may help clinicians to assess and diagnose patients with nonspecific neck pain. Future validity testing is needed to determine how these criteria may help to improve the outcome of physical therapy interventions in nonspecific neck pain patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manual Therapy\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 87-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.math.2016.07.005\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manual Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X16306841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manual Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1356689X16306841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:非特异性颈痛患者是具有不同肌肉骨骼损伤的异质群体。根据临床特征对非特异性颈痛患者进行亚组分类,可能有助于更全面的诊断和指导有效的治疗。目的在一组专家中建立共识,以临床标准提示“关节”、“肌筋膜”、“神经”、“中枢”和“感觉运动控制”功能障碍模式在非特异性颈部疼痛患者中可区分。研究设计德尔菲研究。方法组织10名学术专家组成的焦点小组,对颈痛患者可识别的不同功能障碍模式进行阐述。随后,设计了一项3轮在线德尔菲调查,以获得焦点小组产生的5种不同功能障碍模式的双方同意的症状和体格检查结果。结果共有21名来自比利时和荷兰的具有颈部疼痛评估和治疗经验的肌肉骨骼物理治疗师完成了3轮delphi调查。分别有33名(回复率100.0%)、27名(81.8%)和21名(63.6%)回答了第1轮、第2轮和第3轮。18项“关节”、16项“肌筋膜”、20项“神经”、18项“中枢”和10项“感觉运动控制”临床指标达到了预定义的≥80%的共识水平。结论这些指标提示临床上以“关节”、“肌筋膜”、“神经”、“中枢”和“感觉运动控制”功能障碍模式为主,可以帮助临床医生评估和诊断非特异性颈痛患者。未来的有效性测试需要确定这些标准如何有助于改善非特异性颈部疼痛患者的物理治疗干预的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subjective and clinical assessment criteria suggestive for five clinical patterns discernible in nonspecific neck pain patients. A Delphi-survey of clinical experts

Background

Nonspecific neck pain patients form a heterogeneous group with different musculoskeletal impairments. Classifying nonspecific neck pain patients into subgroups based on clinical characteristics might lead to more comprehensive diagnoses and can guide effective management.

Objective

To establish consensus among a group of experts regarding the clinical criteria suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’ and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns distinguishable in patients with nonspecific neck pain.

Study design

Delphi study.

Methods

A focus group with 10 academic experts was organized to elaborate on the different dysfunction patterns discernible in neck pain patients. Consecutively, a 3-round online Delphi-survey was designed to obtain consensual symptoms and physical examination findings for the 5 distinct dysfunction patterns resulting from the focus group.

Results

A total of 21 musculoskeletal physical therapists from Belgium and the Netherlands experienced in assessing and treating neck pain patients completed the 3-round Delphi-survey. Respectively, 33 (response rate, 100.0%), 27 (81.8%) and 21 (63.6%) respondents replied to rounds 1, 2 and 3. Eighteen ‘articular’, 16 ‘myofascial’, 20 ‘neural’, 18 ‘central’ and 10 ‘sensorimotor control’ clinical indicators reached a predefined ≥80% consensus level.

Conclusion

These indicators suggestive of a clinical dominance of ‘articular’, ‘myofascial’, ‘neural’, ‘central’, and ‘sensorimotor control’ dysfunction patterns may help clinicians to assess and diagnose patients with nonspecific neck pain. Future validity testing is needed to determine how these criteria may help to improve the outcome of physical therapy interventions in nonspecific neck pain patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manual Therapy
Manual Therapy 医学-康复医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Osteopathic correction of arterial hypertension in hypertensive patients with anxiety syndrome Assessing the agreement between specialists in ultrasound diagnostics of degenerative changes in the L5-S1 intervertebral disc Modern aspects of diagnostics and treatment of circulatory disorders in the vertebrobasilar system The evolutionofconcepts of autonomic dysfunction (a review) The rationale for the use of osteopathic correction in patients with nasal breathing disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1