人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测用于宫颈癌筛查的选择:加纳全基因分型和快速定性HPV- dna测定的比较

Gynecologic oncology research and practice Pub Date : 2017-03-03 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40661-017-0041-1
Dorcas Obiri-Yeboah, Yaw Adu-Sarkodie, Florencia Djigma, Kafui Akakpo, Ebenezer Aniakwa-Bonsu, Daniel Amoako-Sakyi, Simpore Jacques, Philippe Mayaud
{"title":"人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测用于宫颈癌筛查的选择:加纳全基因分型和快速定性HPV- dna测定的比较","authors":"Dorcas Obiri-Yeboah,&nbsp;Yaw Adu-Sarkodie,&nbsp;Florencia Djigma,&nbsp;Kafui Akakpo,&nbsp;Ebenezer Aniakwa-Bonsu,&nbsp;Daniel Amoako-Sakyi,&nbsp;Simpore Jacques,&nbsp;Philippe Mayaud","doi":"10.1186/s40661-017-0041-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern cervical cancer screening increasingly relies on the use of molecular techniques detecting high-risk oncogenic human papillomavirus (hr-HPV). A major challenge for developing countries like Ghana has been the unavailability and costs of HPV DNA-based testing. This study compares the performance of <i>care</i>HPV, a semi-rapid and affordable qualitative detection assay for 14 hr-HPV genotypes, with HPV genotyping, for the detection of cytological cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study comparing between frequency matched HIV-1 seropositive and HIV-seronegative women was conducted in the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana. A systematic sampling method was used to select women attending clinics in the hospital. Cervical samples were tested for HPV by <i>care</i>HPV and Anyplex-II HPV28 genotyping assay, and by conventional cytology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 paired results (94 from HIV-1 seropositive and 81 from HIV-seronegative women) were analyzed based on the ability of both tests to detect the 14 hr-HPV types included in the <i>care</i>HPV assay. The inter-assay concordance was 94.3% (95%CI: 89.7-97.2%, kappa = 0.88), similar by HIV serostatus. The <i>care</i>HPV assay was equally sensitive among HIV-1 seropositive and seronegative women (97.3% vs. 95.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.50) and slightly more specific among HIV-seronegative women (85.0% vs. 93.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.10). <i>care</i>HPV had good sensitivity (87.5%) but low specificity (52.1%) for the detection of low SIL or greater lesions, but its performance was superior to genotyping (87.5 and 38.8%, respectively). Reproducibility of <i>care</i>HPV, tested on 97 samples by the same individual was 82.5% (95%CI: 73.4-89.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance characteristics of <i>care</i>HPV compared to genotyping suggest that this simpler and cheaper HPV detection assay could offer a suitable alternative for HPV screening in Ghana.</p>","PeriodicalId":91487,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology research and practice","volume":"4 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40661-017-0041-1","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Options in human papillomavirus (HPV) detection for cervical cancer screening: comparison between full genotyping and a rapid qualitative HPV-DNA assay in Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Dorcas Obiri-Yeboah,&nbsp;Yaw Adu-Sarkodie,&nbsp;Florencia Djigma,&nbsp;Kafui Akakpo,&nbsp;Ebenezer Aniakwa-Bonsu,&nbsp;Daniel Amoako-Sakyi,&nbsp;Simpore Jacques,&nbsp;Philippe Mayaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40661-017-0041-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern cervical cancer screening increasingly relies on the use of molecular techniques detecting high-risk oncogenic human papillomavirus (hr-HPV). A major challenge for developing countries like Ghana has been the unavailability and costs of HPV DNA-based testing. This study compares the performance of <i>care</i>HPV, a semi-rapid and affordable qualitative detection assay for 14 hr-HPV genotypes, with HPV genotyping, for the detection of cytological cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study comparing between frequency matched HIV-1 seropositive and HIV-seronegative women was conducted in the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana. A systematic sampling method was used to select women attending clinics in the hospital. Cervical samples were tested for HPV by <i>care</i>HPV and Anyplex-II HPV28 genotyping assay, and by conventional cytology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 paired results (94 from HIV-1 seropositive and 81 from HIV-seronegative women) were analyzed based on the ability of both tests to detect the 14 hr-HPV types included in the <i>care</i>HPV assay. The inter-assay concordance was 94.3% (95%CI: 89.7-97.2%, kappa = 0.88), similar by HIV serostatus. The <i>care</i>HPV assay was equally sensitive among HIV-1 seropositive and seronegative women (97.3% vs. 95.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.50) and slightly more specific among HIV-seronegative women (85.0% vs. 93.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.10). <i>care</i>HPV had good sensitivity (87.5%) but low specificity (52.1%) for the detection of low SIL or greater lesions, but its performance was superior to genotyping (87.5 and 38.8%, respectively). Reproducibility of <i>care</i>HPV, tested on 97 samples by the same individual was 82.5% (95%CI: 73.4-89.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance characteristics of <i>care</i>HPV compared to genotyping suggest that this simpler and cheaper HPV detection assay could offer a suitable alternative for HPV screening in Ghana.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40661-017-0041-1\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40661-017-0041-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40661-017-0041-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景:现代宫颈癌筛查越来越依赖于使用分子技术检测高危致癌人乳头瘤病毒(hr-HPV)。加纳等发展中国家面临的一个主要挑战是HPV dna检测的不可获得性和成本。本研究比较了careHPV(一种针对14hr -HPV基因型的半快速且价格合理的定性检测方法)与HPV基因型检测宫颈鳞状上皮内病变(SIL)的性能。方法:在加纳海岸角教学医院对HIV-1血清阳性和HIV-1血清阴性妇女进行频率匹配的比较研究。采用系统抽样的方法对在该院就诊的妇女进行抽样调查。宫颈样本采用careHPV和Anyplex-II HPV28基因分型试验及常规细胞学检测HPV。结果:基于两种检测方法检测careHPV检测中包含的14小时hpv类型的能力,共分析了175个配对结果(94个来自HIV-1血清阳性妇女,81个来自HIV-1血清阴性妇女)。检测间一致性为94.3% (95%CI: 89.7-97.2%, kappa = 0.88),与HIV血清状态相似。careHPV检测在HIV-1血清阳性和血清阴性妇女中同样敏感(97.3%对95.7%,p = 0.50),在HIV-1血清阴性妇女中特异性略高(85.0%对93.1%,p = 0.10)。careHPV检测低SIL或更大病变的敏感性(87.5%)较好,特异性(52.1%)较低,但优于基因分型(分别为87.5%和38.8%)。同一个体在97个样本中检测的careHPV的重复性为82.5% (95%CI: 73.4-89.4%)。结论:与基因分型相比,careHPV的性能特征表明,这种更简单、更便宜的HPV检测方法可以为加纳的HPV筛查提供合适的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Options in human papillomavirus (HPV) detection for cervical cancer screening: comparison between full genotyping and a rapid qualitative HPV-DNA assay in Ghana.

Background: Modern cervical cancer screening increasingly relies on the use of molecular techniques detecting high-risk oncogenic human papillomavirus (hr-HPV). A major challenge for developing countries like Ghana has been the unavailability and costs of HPV DNA-based testing. This study compares the performance of careHPV, a semi-rapid and affordable qualitative detection assay for 14 hr-HPV genotypes, with HPV genotyping, for the detection of cytological cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL).

Methods: A study comparing between frequency matched HIV-1 seropositive and HIV-seronegative women was conducted in the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana. A systematic sampling method was used to select women attending clinics in the hospital. Cervical samples were tested for HPV by careHPV and Anyplex-II HPV28 genotyping assay, and by conventional cytology.

Results: A total of 175 paired results (94 from HIV-1 seropositive and 81 from HIV-seronegative women) were analyzed based on the ability of both tests to detect the 14 hr-HPV types included in the careHPV assay. The inter-assay concordance was 94.3% (95%CI: 89.7-97.2%, kappa = 0.88), similar by HIV serostatus. The careHPV assay was equally sensitive among HIV-1 seropositive and seronegative women (97.3% vs. 95.7%, p = 0.50) and slightly more specific among HIV-seronegative women (85.0% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.10). careHPV had good sensitivity (87.5%) but low specificity (52.1%) for the detection of low SIL or greater lesions, but its performance was superior to genotyping (87.5 and 38.8%, respectively). Reproducibility of careHPV, tested on 97 samples by the same individual was 82.5% (95%CI: 73.4-89.4%).

Conclusions: The performance characteristics of careHPV compared to genotyping suggest that this simpler and cheaper HPV detection assay could offer a suitable alternative for HPV screening in Ghana.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extra-uterine low grade endometrioid stromal sarcoma arising from ovarian endometriosis: a case report and review of the literature. Preferences of women with epithelial ovarian cancer for aspects of genetic testing. Safety and feasibility of contained uterine morcellation in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. A small molecule inhibitor of the perinucleolar compartment, ML246, attenuates growth and spread of ovarian cancer. Response to pembrolizumab in a heavily treated patient with metastatic ovarian carcinosarcoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1