重度预治疗的复发性卵巢癌老年患者对口服或静脉化疗的偏好:一项前瞻性多中心试验的最终结果

Gynecologic oncology research and practice Pub Date : 2017-03-07 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40661-017-0040-2
Radoslav Chekerov, Philipp Harter, Stefan Fuxius, Lars Christian Hanker, Linn Woelber, Lothar Müller, Peter Klare, Wolfgang Abenhardt, Yoana Nedkova, Isil Yalcinkaya, Georg Heinrich, Harald Sommer, Sven Mahner, Pauline Wimberger, Dominique Koensgen-Mustea, Rolf Richter, Gülten Oskay-Oezcelik, Jalid Sehouli
{"title":"重度预治疗的复发性卵巢癌老年患者对口服或静脉化疗的偏好:一项前瞻性多中心试验的最终结果","authors":"Radoslav Chekerov,&nbsp;Philipp Harter,&nbsp;Stefan Fuxius,&nbsp;Lars Christian Hanker,&nbsp;Linn Woelber,&nbsp;Lothar Müller,&nbsp;Peter Klare,&nbsp;Wolfgang Abenhardt,&nbsp;Yoana Nedkova,&nbsp;Isil Yalcinkaya,&nbsp;Georg Heinrich,&nbsp;Harald Sommer,&nbsp;Sven Mahner,&nbsp;Pauline Wimberger,&nbsp;Dominique Koensgen-Mustea,&nbsp;Rolf Richter,&nbsp;Gülten Oskay-Oezcelik,&nbsp;Jalid Sehouli","doi":"10.1186/s40661-017-0040-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative systemic treatment in elderly gynaecological cancer patients remains a major challenge. In recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), treosulfan an active alkylating drug showed similar cytotoxicity whether as oral (p.o.) or intravenous (i.v.) application. The aim of this innovative trial was to evaluate the preference of elderly patients (≥65 years) for p.o. or i.v. chemotherapy focusing compliance, outcome, toxicities, and geriatric aspects as secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ROC had the free choice between treosulfan i.v. (7000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> d1, q29d) or p.o. (600 mg/m<sup>2</sup> daily d1-28, q57d). Only indecisive participants were randomized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall 123 patients with 2<sup>nd</sup> to 5<sup>th</sup> recurrence were registered and 119 received at least one cycle of chemotherapy. 85.7% preferred treosulfan i.v. and 14.3% oral, where only three patients were randomized. Main reasons for i.v. preference associated with individual expectations of lower rate of gastrointestinal disorders, higher activity and tolerability of treatment. Median of applied chemotherapies was three (range 1-12 cycles), with most common grade 3/4 toxicities thrombopenia (18.7%), leukopenia (15.7%), ascites (7.6%), bowel obstruction (6.7%), and abdominal pain (4.2%). Median time until progression/overall survival was 5.2/7.8 months (i.v.), and 5.6/10.4 months (p.o.), respectively, without significant differences in efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer asked and demonstrated active participation in the decision-making process of their oncological treatment and favoured predominantly the i.v. application. Treosulfan was generally well-tolerated despite comorbidities and heavy pre-treatment. Our study demonstrates that patients' preference did not influence prognosis negatively and remains important in gynaecologic oncology decision practice.</p><p><strong>Eudract nr: </strong>2004-000719-25; NCT 00170690.</p>","PeriodicalId":91487,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology research and practice","volume":"4 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40661-017-0040-2","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preference of elderly patients' to oral or intravenous chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated recurrent ovarian cancer: final results of a prospective multicenter trial.\",\"authors\":\"Radoslav Chekerov,&nbsp;Philipp Harter,&nbsp;Stefan Fuxius,&nbsp;Lars Christian Hanker,&nbsp;Linn Woelber,&nbsp;Lothar Müller,&nbsp;Peter Klare,&nbsp;Wolfgang Abenhardt,&nbsp;Yoana Nedkova,&nbsp;Isil Yalcinkaya,&nbsp;Georg Heinrich,&nbsp;Harald Sommer,&nbsp;Sven Mahner,&nbsp;Pauline Wimberger,&nbsp;Dominique Koensgen-Mustea,&nbsp;Rolf Richter,&nbsp;Gülten Oskay-Oezcelik,&nbsp;Jalid Sehouli\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40661-017-0040-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative systemic treatment in elderly gynaecological cancer patients remains a major challenge. In recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), treosulfan an active alkylating drug showed similar cytotoxicity whether as oral (p.o.) or intravenous (i.v.) application. The aim of this innovative trial was to evaluate the preference of elderly patients (≥65 years) for p.o. or i.v. chemotherapy focusing compliance, outcome, toxicities, and geriatric aspects as secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ROC had the free choice between treosulfan i.v. (7000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> d1, q29d) or p.o. (600 mg/m<sup>2</sup> daily d1-28, q57d). Only indecisive participants were randomized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall 123 patients with 2<sup>nd</sup> to 5<sup>th</sup> recurrence were registered and 119 received at least one cycle of chemotherapy. 85.7% preferred treosulfan i.v. and 14.3% oral, where only three patients were randomized. Main reasons for i.v. preference associated with individual expectations of lower rate of gastrointestinal disorders, higher activity and tolerability of treatment. Median of applied chemotherapies was three (range 1-12 cycles), with most common grade 3/4 toxicities thrombopenia (18.7%), leukopenia (15.7%), ascites (7.6%), bowel obstruction (6.7%), and abdominal pain (4.2%). Median time until progression/overall survival was 5.2/7.8 months (i.v.), and 5.6/10.4 months (p.o.), respectively, without significant differences in efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer asked and demonstrated active participation in the decision-making process of their oncological treatment and favoured predominantly the i.v. application. Treosulfan was generally well-tolerated despite comorbidities and heavy pre-treatment. Our study demonstrates that patients' preference did not influence prognosis negatively and remains important in gynaecologic oncology decision practice.</p><p><strong>Eudract nr: </strong>2004-000719-25; NCT 00170690.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40661-017-0040-2\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40661-017-0040-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40661-017-0040-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:姑息性全身治疗在老年妇科癌症患者中仍然是一个主要的挑战。在复发性卵巢癌(ROC)中,活性烷基化药物曲硫丹无论是口服(p.o.)还是静脉(i.v.)应用,都显示出相似的细胞毒性。这项创新试验的目的是评估老年患者(≥65岁)对口服化疗或静脉化疗的偏好,并将依从性、结局、毒性和老年方面作为次要终点。方法:ROC患者可自由选择曲硫丹静脉注射(7000mg /m2 d1, q29d)或p.o (600mg /m2每日d1- 28,q57d)。只有优柔寡断的参与者被随机化。结果:共登记第2 ~ 5期复发患者123例,其中119例接受了至少一个周期的化疗。85.7%的人选择静脉注射曲硫丹,14.3%的人选择口服曲硫丹,其中只有3名患者是随机的。静脉注射偏好的主要原因与个体期望较低的胃肠道疾病发生率、较高的治疗活性和耐受性有关。应用化疗的中位数为3个(范围为1-12个周期),最常见的3/4级毒性是血小板减少(18.7%)、白细胞减少(15.7%)、腹水(7.6%)、肠梗阻(6.7%)和腹痛(4.2%)。中位进展时间/总生存期分别为5.2/7.8个月(iv)和5.6/10.4个月(p /o),疗效无显著差异。结论:老年复发性卵巢癌患者询问并积极参与肿瘤治疗的决策过程,并以静脉注射为主。尽管有合并症和大量的预处理,曲硫丹总体上耐受性良好。我们的研究表明,患者的偏好对预后没有负面影响,在妇科肿瘤决策实践中仍然很重要。草案号:2004-000719-25;NCT 00170690。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preference of elderly patients' to oral or intravenous chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated recurrent ovarian cancer: final results of a prospective multicenter trial.

Background: Palliative systemic treatment in elderly gynaecological cancer patients remains a major challenge. In recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), treosulfan an active alkylating drug showed similar cytotoxicity whether as oral (p.o.) or intravenous (i.v.) application. The aim of this innovative trial was to evaluate the preference of elderly patients (≥65 years) for p.o. or i.v. chemotherapy focusing compliance, outcome, toxicities, and geriatric aspects as secondary endpoints.

Methods: Patients with ROC had the free choice between treosulfan i.v. (7000 mg/m2 d1, q29d) or p.o. (600 mg/m2 daily d1-28, q57d). Only indecisive participants were randomized.

Results: Overall 123 patients with 2nd to 5th recurrence were registered and 119 received at least one cycle of chemotherapy. 85.7% preferred treosulfan i.v. and 14.3% oral, where only three patients were randomized. Main reasons for i.v. preference associated with individual expectations of lower rate of gastrointestinal disorders, higher activity and tolerability of treatment. Median of applied chemotherapies was three (range 1-12 cycles), with most common grade 3/4 toxicities thrombopenia (18.7%), leukopenia (15.7%), ascites (7.6%), bowel obstruction (6.7%), and abdominal pain (4.2%). Median time until progression/overall survival was 5.2/7.8 months (i.v.), and 5.6/10.4 months (p.o.), respectively, without significant differences in efficacy.

Conclusions: Elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer asked and demonstrated active participation in the decision-making process of their oncological treatment and favoured predominantly the i.v. application. Treosulfan was generally well-tolerated despite comorbidities and heavy pre-treatment. Our study demonstrates that patients' preference did not influence prognosis negatively and remains important in gynaecologic oncology decision practice.

Eudract nr: 2004-000719-25; NCT 00170690.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extra-uterine low grade endometrioid stromal sarcoma arising from ovarian endometriosis: a case report and review of the literature. Preferences of women with epithelial ovarian cancer for aspects of genetic testing. Safety and feasibility of contained uterine morcellation in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. A small molecule inhibitor of the perinucleolar compartment, ML246, attenuates growth and spread of ovarian cancer. Response to pembrolizumab in a heavily treated patient with metastatic ovarian carcinosarcoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1