严重精神疾病的蛋白质组测量评估。

S Charles Schulz, Shauna Overgaard, David J Bond, Rajesh Kaldate
{"title":"严重精神疾病的蛋白质组测量评估。","authors":"S Charles Schulz,&nbsp;Shauna Overgaard,&nbsp;David J Bond,&nbsp;Rajesh Kaldate","doi":"10.3371/CSRP.SSSO.071717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnoses of serious psychiatric illnesses, such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder, rely on the subjective recall and interpretation of often overlapping symptoms, and are not based on the objective pathophysiology of the illnesses. The subjectivity of symptom reporting and interpretation contributes to the delay of accurate diagnoses and limits effective treatment of these illnesses. Proteomics, the study of the types and quantities of proteins an organism produces, may offer an objective biological approach to psychiatric diagnosis. For this pilot study, we used the Myriad RBM Discovery Map 250+ platform to quantify 205 serum proteins in subjects with schizophrenia (n=26), schizoaffective disorder (n=20), bipolar disorder (n=16), and healthy controls with no psychiatric illness (n=23). Fifty-seven analytes that differed significantly between groups were used for multivariate modeling with linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Diagnoses generated from these models were compared to SCID-generated clinical diagnoses to determine whether the proteomic markers: 1) distinguished the three disorders from controls, and 2) distinguished between the three disorders. We found that a series of binary classification models including 8-12 analytes produced separation between all subjects and controls, and between each diagnostic group and controls. There was a high degree of accuracy in the separations, with training areas-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.94-1.0, and cross-validation AUC of 0.94-0.95. Models with 7-14 analytes produced separation between the diagnostic groups, though less robustly, with training AUC of 0.72-1.0 and validation AUC of 0.69-0.89. While based on a small sample size, not adjusted for medication state, these preliminary results support the potential of proteomics as a diagnostic aid in psychiatry. The separation of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder suggests that further work in this area is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":40019,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Proteomic Measures Across Serious Psychiatric Illness.\",\"authors\":\"S Charles Schulz,&nbsp;Shauna Overgaard,&nbsp;David J Bond,&nbsp;Rajesh Kaldate\",\"doi\":\"10.3371/CSRP.SSSO.071717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The diagnoses of serious psychiatric illnesses, such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder, rely on the subjective recall and interpretation of often overlapping symptoms, and are not based on the objective pathophysiology of the illnesses. The subjectivity of symptom reporting and interpretation contributes to the delay of accurate diagnoses and limits effective treatment of these illnesses. Proteomics, the study of the types and quantities of proteins an organism produces, may offer an objective biological approach to psychiatric diagnosis. For this pilot study, we used the Myriad RBM Discovery Map 250+ platform to quantify 205 serum proteins in subjects with schizophrenia (n=26), schizoaffective disorder (n=20), bipolar disorder (n=16), and healthy controls with no psychiatric illness (n=23). Fifty-seven analytes that differed significantly between groups were used for multivariate modeling with linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Diagnoses generated from these models were compared to SCID-generated clinical diagnoses to determine whether the proteomic markers: 1) distinguished the three disorders from controls, and 2) distinguished between the three disorders. We found that a series of binary classification models including 8-12 analytes produced separation between all subjects and controls, and between each diagnostic group and controls. There was a high degree of accuracy in the separations, with training areas-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.94-1.0, and cross-validation AUC of 0.94-0.95. Models with 7-14 analytes produced separation between the diagnostic groups, though less robustly, with training AUC of 0.72-1.0 and validation AUC of 0.69-0.89. While based on a small sample size, not adjusted for medication state, these preliminary results support the potential of proteomics as a diagnostic aid in psychiatry. The separation of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder suggests that further work in this area is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.SSSO.071717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.SSSO.071717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

严重精神疾病的诊断,如精神分裂症、分裂情感障碍和双相情感障碍,依赖于经常重叠的症状的主观回忆和解释,而不是基于疾病的客观病理生理学。症状报告和解释的主观性导致了准确诊断的延迟,限制了这些疾病的有效治疗。蛋白质组学,研究生物体产生的蛋白质的种类和数量,可能为精神病诊断提供客观的生物学方法。在这项初步研究中,我们使用了Myriad RBM Discovery Map 250+平台,对精神分裂症(n=26)、分裂情感性障碍(n=20)、双相情感障碍(n=16)和无精神疾病的健康对照(n=23)的205种血清蛋白进行了量化。采用线性判别分析(LDA)对57个组间差异显著的分析物进行多变量建模。将这些模型生成的诊断与scid生成的临床诊断进行比较,以确定蛋白质组学标记是否:1)将三种疾病与对照组区分开来,2)区分三种疾病。我们发现,包括8-12个分析物在内的一系列二元分类模型在所有受试者和对照组之间以及每个诊断组和对照组之间产生了分离。分离的准确度较高,训练曲线下面积(AUC)为0.94 ~ 1.0,交叉验证AUC为0.94 ~ 0.95。具有7-14个分析物的模型在诊断组之间产生分离,尽管不太稳健,训练AUC为0.72-1.0,验证AUC为0.69-0.89。虽然基于小样本量,没有调整药物状态,但这些初步结果支持蛋白质组学作为精神病学诊断辅助的潜力。精神分裂症、分裂情感障碍和双相情感障碍的分离表明,在这一领域的进一步工作是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Proteomic Measures Across Serious Psychiatric Illness.

The diagnoses of serious psychiatric illnesses, such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder, rely on the subjective recall and interpretation of often overlapping symptoms, and are not based on the objective pathophysiology of the illnesses. The subjectivity of symptom reporting and interpretation contributes to the delay of accurate diagnoses and limits effective treatment of these illnesses. Proteomics, the study of the types and quantities of proteins an organism produces, may offer an objective biological approach to psychiatric diagnosis. For this pilot study, we used the Myriad RBM Discovery Map 250+ platform to quantify 205 serum proteins in subjects with schizophrenia (n=26), schizoaffective disorder (n=20), bipolar disorder (n=16), and healthy controls with no psychiatric illness (n=23). Fifty-seven analytes that differed significantly between groups were used for multivariate modeling with linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Diagnoses generated from these models were compared to SCID-generated clinical diagnoses to determine whether the proteomic markers: 1) distinguished the three disorders from controls, and 2) distinguished between the three disorders. We found that a series of binary classification models including 8-12 analytes produced separation between all subjects and controls, and between each diagnostic group and controls. There was a high degree of accuracy in the separations, with training areas-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.94-1.0, and cross-validation AUC of 0.94-0.95. Models with 7-14 analytes produced separation between the diagnostic groups, though less robustly, with training AUC of 0.72-1.0 and validation AUC of 0.69-0.89. While based on a small sample size, not adjusted for medication state, these preliminary results support the potential of proteomics as a diagnostic aid in psychiatry. The separation of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder suggests that further work in this area is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The vision of the exciting new peer-reviewed quarterly publication Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses (CS) is to provide psychiatrists and other healthcare professionals with the latest research and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia and related psychoses. CS is a practice-oriented publication focused exclusively on the newest research findings, guidelines, treatment protocols, and clinical trials relevant to patient care.
期刊最新文献
Dysexecutive Behavior in First-Episode Schizophrenia. Dysexecutive Behavior in First-Episode Schizophrenia Grading meningiomas by used imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging The Association between Serum Levels of Ferritin and D-Dimer with Liver Function Tests in Patients with COVID-19 Role of Susceptibility Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neurological Diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1